Agreed. But the goalposts (sic) may have moved since then. Especially if a developer becomes interested in the potential for multi use that does indeed include association football.Surely the primary tenant can protect themselves. Or are you saying SISU are so powerful they can force any groundshare agreement they desire?
If Millerchip is concerned he doesn't have to sell the lease. The sub lease holder certainly doesn't seem concerned.
The current clause allows it to be used for rugby. The amendment suggested by the council specifically excluded professional football.
Even of non league vintage
Sent from my SGP611 using Tapatalk