standupforcity
Well-Known Member
When was the last time we bought a player for anything other than an 'undisclosed fee'? Does anyone remember? If so who was it and what did we pay?
Undisclosed fee (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter standupforcity
- Start date
Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Yes most players we sign for cash on those rare occasions are undisclosed. I don't really know the reasons.
I think I read we haven't paid for turnbull but got him for free with a 50% sell on fee to Southampton as payment?
I think I read we haven't paid for turnbull but got him for free with a 50% sell on fee to Southampton as payment?
It's usually the selling club that insist on this, but not always.
The fact that we paid so much for Jones, you'd have thought it would have been massively in the club's interests to disclose the fee to demonstrate to the fans that they are investing in the team, so I can only assume that D&R insisted on that. As for this one, perhaps Southampton didn't want their supporters aware of the fact they had unloaded a promising young player for peanuts.
The fact that we paid so much for Jones, you'd have thought it would have been massively in the club's interests to disclose the fee to demonstrate to the fans that they are investing in the team, so I can only assume that D&R insisted on that. As for this one, perhaps Southampton didn't want their supporters aware of the fact they had unloaded a promising young player for peanuts.
Wyken Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Corrected.
Nick
Administrator
Nick
Administrator
That would be a great bit of business, although I can't understand why Southampton would be ok with that? Anything could happen in the meantime or he could run down his 3 years and we get nothing.
Or they know he is amazing so we will sell him for £10m next year when we win the championship
Nick
Administrator
That makes me sad. We only signed him because he was white and playing for Trinidad.
SkyBlueScottie
Well-Known Member
Why the fascination with knowing the fee?
Why give anything away about the clubs finances to other teams...
Why give anything away about the clubs finances to other teams...
Nick
Administrator
Because people need to be annoyed when a fee is paid, otherwise they will be annoyed it is a free transfer...
OffenhamSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Surely they must have to disclose it in the annual accounts submitted to Companies House?
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Take a look at the BBC Transfer website, the majority of fees are undisclosed, it isn't just an evil, shady CCFC thing.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/transfers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/transfers
SkyBlueScottie
Well-Known Member
Indeed, all other deals is press speculation pretty much.
stevefloyd
Well-Known Member
Maybe they are grateful we got Sisu and they didn'tThat would be a great bit of business, although I can't understand why Southampton would be ok with that? Anything could happen in the meantime or he could run down his 3 years and we get nothing.
Or they know he is amazing so we will sell him for £10m next year when we win the championship
hill83
Well-Known Member
I've said this several times over the years but it doesn't fit the narrative so gets ignored.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Not necessarily, fees aren't always paid in one year so it wouldn't be clear how they sit on the accounts. Some would be paid out and some future liabilities. Not sure how they account for milestone or achievement based payments either.
better days
Well-Known Member
Quite a few deals are done with a base fee then additions - for example if the buying club get promoted further payments are due. Plus of course a percentage of any sell on fee. Clubs will especially want to keep that element quiet for obvious reasons
ClarkeZ
Well-Known Member
That would be a great bit of business, although I can't understand why Southampton would be ok with that? Anything could happen in the meantime or he could run down his 3 years and we get nothing.
Or they know he is amazing so we will sell him for £10m next year when we win the championship
Surely if they were confident of his future ability they would simply loan him out and then get the full fee when/if they sell him on?
Unless they were to incorporate a first refusal buy-back clause should he fulfill any potential they think he has?
no_loyalty
Well-Known Member
That's why it was undisclosed then, to make us all believe Sisu actually paid out some money
ClarkeZ
Well-Known Member
As someone said above, it is usually the selling club that defines whether or not the fee is disclosed.