olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
In truth I don't care who runs the trust. Hypocrisy I do, however, not like.
That's why I mention Natalie Cox. I know nothing about her other than she did once stand up against ranson in a forum who dismissed her because she was a woman. However, she was widely ridiculed by many posters on here.
The very same posters, no doubt, who now say you shouldn't criticise if you haven't "done anything"
I don't think the trust feels like an inclusive body, I think it comes across as an exclusive "boys own" club where you go with the majority or you stay out
I have no real opinion of Mr Brown either. He came across reasonably well in the local media when interviewed.
However, the wasps stance he made on here I could not reconcile as a sensible viewpoint.
She was ridiculed, and lots of personal stuff to go with it. Ranson did dismiss her for asking what his strategy was, or something like that, which I didn't like at all. It seemed she was criticised on here too for being a woman, or "she doesn't speak for me". I guess that bit didn't stop when she moved on.
I attended a couple of the early trust meetings, and felt I had my say, as everyone else did. They listened to anyone who had a say and went with the consensus. That's fair enough I think.
I think you got the wording slightly wrong on your earlier post though, which reflects some of the responses.