Only good business if they are replaced in some way and not just short term loans.To be honest I would happy with a million for him
1.5 for Stevenson
1 million for Willis
good business in my book
To be honest I would happy with a million for him
1.5 for Stevenson
1 million for Willis
good business in my book
The only one of those prices I agree with would be the 1 million for Willis. Clubs are paying for potential with the other 2, not complete players, and that should come with a premium. 1 mill and 1.5 mill for Harries and Stevenson is nothing, even for upper championship clubs these days.To be honest I would happy with a million for him
1.5 for Stevenson
1 million for Willis
good business in my book
You'd be happy? Even though we won't see a penny of it on the pitch?
Would have. Not would of. You fucking imbeciles.
I'm not sure about a million for Willis.
Would of slapped you if you would of said that in real life.
It irks me too, but I'm far more nice about it.
In that case they could watch him play for us.Liverpool want to see boy play in another game.
That's what I don't get, why do we worry and bother discussing the numbers involved In outgoingYou'd be happy? Even though we won't see a penny of it on the pitch?
That's what I don't get, why do we worry and bother discussing the numbers involved In outgoing
transfers, when we know it will make little to no difference to the managers budget.
Yeah, I get ya.Because the other angle is a faint hope that if they pay off the debt they'll fuck off?
Is it confirmed he is back?