Only good business if they are replaced in some way and not just short term loans.To be honest I would happy with a million for him
1.5 for Stevenson
1 million for Willis
good business in my book
To be honest I would happy with a million for him
1.5 for Stevenson
1 million for Willis
good business in my book
The only one of those prices I agree with would be the 1 million for Willis. Clubs are paying for potential with the other 2, not complete players, and that should come with a premium. 1 mill and 1.5 mill for Harries and Stevenson is nothing, even for upper championship clubs these days.To be honest I would happy with a million for him
1.5 for Stevenson
1 million for Willis
good business in my book
You'd be happy? Even though we won't see a penny of it on the pitch?
Would have. Not would of. You fucking imbeciles.
I'm not sure about a million for Willis.
Would of slapped you if you would of said that in real life.
It irks me too, but I'm far more nice about it.![]()
In that case they could watch him play for us.Liverpool want to see boy play in another game.
That's what I don't get, why do we worry and bother discussing the numbers involved In outgoingYou'd be happy? Even though we won't see a penny of it on the pitch?
That's what I don't get, why do we worry and bother discussing the numbers involved In outgoing
transfers, when we know it will make little to no difference to the managers budget.
Yeah, I get ya.Because the other angle is a faint hope that if they pay off the debt they'll fuck off?
Is it confirmed he is back?