The Jimmy Hill Way (49 Viewers)

[Steve.B50]

The pigs at Charlton got publicity, but we need more now than a few well known people just commenting how bad things are.
Action has to be stepped up, being nice never changed anything.

 

---

[Nick]

The pigs at Charlton got publicity, but we need more now than a few well known people just commenting how bad things are.
Action has to be stepped up, being nice never changed anything.

What sort of action and what's it going to achieve?

 

[Broken Hearted Sky Blue]

What sort of action and what's it going to achieve?

Six fans have been ordered to comit ritual disembowelment on the pitch

 

[Great_Expectations]

The pigs at Charlton got publicity, but we need more now than a few well known people just commenting how bad things are.
Action has to be stepped up, being nice never changed anything.

What is the intention of your final sentence?

 

[Great_Expectations]

I'm still waiting to hear what this group have said and done that is so bad.

In all fairness Tony, and I mean this genuinely, I'm still waiting to know who the group are, what their objective is and the plan on how to achieve it.

All I know is the name, nothing more, which isn't great for a group who (I assume) are supposed to represent the fans in some way.

 

[letsallsingtogether]

In all fairness Tony, and I mean this genuinely, I'm still waiting to know who the group are, what their objective is and the plan on how to achieve it.

All I know is the name, nothing more, which isn't great for a group who (I assume) are supposed to represent the fans in some way.

Objective well I would have thought that was obvious.
They were formed to try and get all the known protest groups under one banner.
How they try to achieve this is by keeping up pressure on our owners, not everything is done at games.
However there are other groups out there who are anonymous and plans are unknown.
PUSB

 

[NortonSkyBlue]

Why is that almost a go-to response if people disagree with things?

If I go and have a shite thinking it will make SISU go, if you disagree that SISU will go because of it as you Pro SISU? Are you happy with things as they are?

OR, do you just think me having a shite isn't going to make SISU go?

Or was it because I was interested to hear what the OP had to say and didn't have any agenda either way?

 

[Nick]

Or was it because I was interested to hear what the OP had to say and didn't have any agenda either way?

So you are happy with SISU then?*


*That's the logic used.

 

[ajsccfc]

Being nice has changed loads of things, we're just back on the downward trajectory where everything in the world is horrendous again.

 

[NortonSkyBlue]

So you are happy with SISU then?*


*That's the logic used.

No logic sought, just asked a question asked, no side meanings, just interested in his view.
There are quite a few people on here, including yourself, who are prepared to listen to both sides of the argument.

 

[dongonzalos]

Les Reid likes some people's opinions in this thread. He has twittered a link to the thread out.
Accusing the JHW of having a one eyed look at things.
Luckily we have someone like Les looking at it from all angles and not just one perspective.
He does a lot of investigation into the owners and is just as highly critical of them as he is about the Council and CET. It would be really ironic and quite hypocral if he himself just had a 'one eyed' perspective on things of course.
For example if you looked back at all his articles in the observer and failed to find one where he investigates the owners and hold them accountable, like he does with the council, fans groups and the CET that would be a bit embarrassing.

 

[clint van damme]

Les Reid likes some people's opinions in this thread. He has twittered a link to the thread out.
Accusing the JHW of having a one eyed look at things.
Luckily we have someone like Les looking at it from all angles and not just one perspective.
He does a lot of investigation into the owners and is just as highly critical of them as he is about the Council and CET.

*pulls up chair and opens pop corn*

 

[CovFan]

Les Reid likes some people's opinions in this thread. He has twittered a link to the thread out.
Accusing the JHW of having a one eyed look at things.
Luckily we have someone like Les looking at it from all angles and not just one perspective.
He does a lot of investigation into the owners and is just as highly critical of them as he is about the Council and CET. It would be really ironic and quite hypocral if he himself just had a 'one eyed' perspective on things of course.
For example if you looked back at all his articles in the observer and failed to find one where he investigates the owners and hold them accountable, like he does with the council, fans groups and the CET that would be a bit embarrassing.

Don't forget, he called it "Jimmy Hill WRONG way", clearly the King of wit with coming up with that amusing ditty.

 

[Captain Dart]

Don't forget, he called it "Jimmy Hill WRONG way", clearly the King of wit with coming up with that amusing ditty.

The more he writes about them then it follows the more effective is their campaigning.