Curiosity got the better of me and I decide to have a look at the claims thrown around in that article. It starts off by saying campaigners object to purchases of art worth up to £5m and the NHS is spending millions of pounds on art,
The actual figure 89 trusts have spent £1,894,278 on art in 3 years. So an average of £7,095 per trust per year. Doesn't seem unreasonable unless you think every NHS building should look as depressing as possible.
Article moves on to giving some examples:
£8,000 steel giraffes at Tameside Hospital in Greater Manchester - this was part of a £112m project so a minute percentage of the budget. Its the centrepiece at the entrance of the childrens unit and the design was picked by local school children.
£83,000 water feature at Salford Royal - this appears to be a baby memorial garden funded by the Booth Charities along with public donations.
£120,000 “ceiling artwork” at Barts and Royal London - part of a refurb of the childrens ward, paid for by Vital Arts who are charitably funded to deliver arts projects for the wellbeing of patients, staff and the wider hospital community.
Couldn't find anything about the others but it shows that things in the media shouldn't be taken at face value.