Not sure what century you’re in where you expect investigative journalism for free.
If it gets people to click on it, it’s news. Don’t think it’s news? Don’t click on it. That’s the business model. If people want proper journalism they need to read that. Considering what the top selling papers are in this country, I wouldn’t hold my breath.
BTW, don’t get me wrong. It’s shitty journalism, but we live in a capitalist society and if it don’t get paid it don’t get made.
I'm not sure it is investigative journalism. They have spoken to him and interviewed him but just copied and pasted everything he said rather than pointed out any glaring errors.
The issue is that it quite clearly isn't news but is being dragged on and misleading people. It is about 3 or 4 days behind it actually happened for starters, then if you read the article without seeing a thread like this there's nothing really to say he's chatting shit.
If it takes an investigator to say to him "ay up mate, you said this before and it didnt happen". "you said you dont use your name for betting as you have a username, but on your screenshot you have posted as proof your username is your name".
If people don't see things like this thread, it's no wonder people believe it and get their hopes up.