The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (238 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Astute

Well-Known Member
It's going to be far more accurate than Grendel's claims, which you appear to be believe are more reliable.

Do you really believe that 70% of Labour voters in Labour held constituencies voted leave?
I haven't said how many voted for who and where. What I pointed out is that YouGov have got every election wrong for years. Different parts.of the UK vote differently. So unless they ask people from every part of the UK and then find the average amount of voters in each area their numbers are wrong.

The good thing is governments still listen to them. May expected to get the majority as they said she would. Cameron decided when to have the Brexit vote as they said there was a large majority that were going to vote remain.

Has anyone here ever been asked by YouGov how they will vote?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Hahaha it's priceless, isn't it. Astute seems to think it has legs though so it must be right.

Sigh I will try again.

7 out of 10 labour seats are occupied where votes were leave. Many of these are traditional labour strongholds where the leave vote was especially high.

What you are failing to grasp is that there has been to my knowledge no poll of the last election that tried to ascertain how the voters voted on that issue when they left the ballot box.

The you gov poll you is a poll of members voting intention prior to the 2017 general election

If you apply the voting intention percentages to the 6 main parties and spread the percentage to the actual votes cast (e.g. 12,878,460 were labour voters and 65% means 8,370,999 votes remain) there would have been 17,362,713 votes remain and 14,189,274 to leave so a 55/45 in favour of remain.

Therefore statistically the analysis in the poll is not representing of voter intent from the last election

Is that clearer now?
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
She „won“.

No. It varied in 2016. Leave started doing well as from January. Remain as from Jo Cox‘s death. Then it was a slight lead and a slight loss until the day. Leave won by a small margin on the day
4% is a small margin? Yet if you offered a small 4% pay increase to 90% or more of average workers...I reckon they would rip your arm off!

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
I wouldn't bet on that, the overwhelming majority of MPs are still pro-EU.
You really think they would vote for a deal heavily biased toward the EU? They value their seats in the house too much, because I am sure that even the most resolute remainers would not expect their MP to vote for a UK stitch-up deal!?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
You seriously think our economic outlook is better than Germanys?!

And I'm not sure how old his data is but Britain isn't the 5th largest economy in the world any more.
Have you never heard of Forbes before?

Or did you read it and not want it to be true?

It isn't just an article by one person. If you would have read it properly you will have noticed that many things are used. And the only minus for us was political uncertainty. They also mentioned the possibility of 10,000 banking job losses. The rest is what has been ignored by the remainers.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Errr Britain is still very much an EU country and shall remain so for the whole of 2018?
But the uncertainty of leaving was put into the numbers. But it is the outlook for the next year and years in the future.

Yet I get rubbished when I say that if things go wrong we should get back on our feet after a few years. Massive multinational companies are still investing here and have planned to since the Brexit vote. You will know this if you read the article.

But some people just won't accept good news. But they accept anything coming from someone like YouGov that are constantly wrong :rolleyes:
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
But the uncertainty of leaving was put into the numbers. But it is the outlook for the next year and years in the future.

Yet I get rubbished when I say that if things go wrong we should get back on our feet after a few years. Massive multinational companies are still investing here and have planned to since the Brexit vote. You will know this if you read the article.

But some people just won't accept good news. But they accept anything coming from someone like YouGov that are constantly wrong :rolleyes:

It says it is the outlook for 2018. I'm surprised that you haven't been asked to contribute to national publications with your clear expertise.

What is it exactly about the economy that makes you think the country will be back on its feet afree a few years? Apart from a biased hunch?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
It says it is the outlook for 2018. I'm surprised that you haven't been asked to contribute to national publications with your clear expertise.

What is it exactly about the economy that makes you think the country will be back on its feet afree a few years? Apart from a biased hunch?
I have explained many times. Are you saying that you have ignored me each time?
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Have you never heard of Forbes before?

Or did you read it and not want it to be true?

It isn't just an article by one person. If you would have read it properly you will have noticed that many things are used. And the only minus for us was political uncertainty. They also mentioned the possibility of 10,000 banking job losses. The rest is what has been ignored by the remainers.

our economic outlook is poor and growth forecasts are constantly been down graded. I don't care what 1 article in Forbes says.

Subscribe to read
Sharp cut to UK growth forecast
IMF downgrades UK growth expectations as Brexit creates "key uncertainty"

Nothing to do with leave voters or remain voters, ridiculous to mention it. Anyone who's been watching the economy knows things aren't looking good currently.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member

martcov

Well-Known Member
4% is a small margin? Yet if you offered a small 4% pay increase to 90% or more of average workers...I reckon they would rip your arm off!

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

The catering union here want at least 8%, which our employers would pay, if the workers accept more flexibility, No one wants 4% in this trade. Too little. So it is all relative. Changing the direction based on a small minority will cause division for years to come, especially if things go bandy.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Stop talking Britain down!!!

I've said it before, I would love to see the economy flying. My son leaves school next spring and I would want as many opportunities as possible available to him but I am very pessimistic based on what I read and what I see. I'm just been a realist. I could be wrong and hope I am but it's very difficult to find anything to be optimistic about.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
What a ridiculous statement.
Why is it?

A non biased well respected company that comes out with good news can't be proved wrong. Yet you try to. You either don't know how economics work or you are trying to prove them wrong.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top