Fonte was offside when the original ball came back in. God knows what the rules are these days but fact is he was offside
Fonte was offside when the original ball came back in. God knows what the rules are these days but fact is he was offside
You could argue that as he was in a position to receive the ball he was interfering with play and when he did receive the ball he became active so the offside position from the initial ball gets called.FA said:A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by: interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or.
Well no the rules are he was onside
Who gives a fuck, we won
Fonte was offside for his goal in the first game as wellFonte was offside when the original ball came back in. God knows what the rules are these days but fact is he was offside
He was offside, decision was correct and a brave one.Well no the rules are he was onside
Been watching chunks of the game over and over again. Recorded it last night and keep playing it back.
We were scintillating.
foul! more like assault if you ask me:joyful::joyful::joyful:A foul on Grimmer for their goal too
Isn't this how we played during Robbins first brief stint, we were knocking teams over - 5 at Hartlepool I away remember, even Adam Barton scored. It always puzzled me at the start of the season that we were so defensively minded.. It wasn't until the very end that the team` properly loosened up. Having Bayliss and an inform Biamou helped, but I suspect it was getting Kelly to play more forward may have been the key tactical change
MR is one win away from doing over and above what his budget expected of him this season.
Whatever happens, its been a successful season and one to build on.