Well he's on Marr tonorrow through his own choice! There is a precedent apparently so it should be ok.
He has not been charged of anything yet. I think that is relevant.
Well he's on Marr tonorrow through his own choice! There is a precedent apparently so it should be ok.
What obsession?Then the same could be said of Astute's obsessions as well.
What obsession?
As I have stated I have a go at all sides and praise nobody who doesn't deserve it. I don't defend anyone. But in here you are supposed to give support to the EU. Fuck that. They are as bent as they come.
I suppose if I had a go at everyone but the EU or not mention the problems with the countries of the EU like with Ital ....Just like you do......You would be happy with my posts.
Reading up on Arron Banks and there’s so many dodgy stories about him from Russian diamonds to attempting to financially facilitate regime change of an African country. You can’t help but feel that if he gets found guilty of one thing a whole stack of cards is going to come tumbling down. Of course he could be innocent and done nothing wrong on all counts but what is clear is that he moves in some very unsavoury circles, by choice.
... and a decent explainer of what they were up to with the money:
Thread by @Nealb2010: "So how did vote leave cheat? What was this extra money spent on and can it be justified? Ah I didn't fall for any of that, I hear you say.. […]"
... and a decent explainer of what they were up to with the money:
Thread by @Nealb2010: "So how did vote leave cheat? What was this extra money spent on and can it be justified? Ah I didn't fall for any of that, I hear you say.. […]"
You mean even in the face of all that scaremongering over 18months or so - people STILL want to leave?
And the same people questioned don't think that any of Boris, Corbyn or Farage would do a worse job than May.
But the EU can't continue as it is. It needs to reform and quickly. But those at the top don't want reform. They want their project to continue as it is. They want people to leave poor countries and move to rich countries. They don't care what happens to the poor countries after they have left. And now people have had enough.
It isn't me that has an agenda. It is you.That's just not really true though, is it? Look how EU membership has transformed a country like Ireland. You also have countries like Poland and Romania with their economies growing.
I guess that doesn't fit your agenda though and I can't believe you have the audacity to now try and paint yourself as anti-Brexit, it really is hilarious.
It isn't me that has an agenda. It is you.
So are right wing politics growing in the EU like I said? I noticed you never mentioned that.
The problem you have with me is I don't defend anyone and have a go at just about everyone when the evidence is there. But your job on here seems to be to defend the EU.
So Romania is growing? I said about the younger people leaving causing problems. I notice you never denied this fact. How about being truthful to the situation for once? And this isn't blaming the EU although you will try to make out that I am.
That 400,000 Romanians live in the UK is a tragedy for their homeland | Claudia Ciobanu
New Statistics Confirm Romania’s Demographic Catastrophe - Emerging Europe
The problem you have with me is I don't defend anyone and have a go at just about everyone when the evidence is there
So remind me what I said about Ireland?Yet again you try and portray yourself as having zero agenda and your opinion on something is 'the truth'. As i said, it's comedy gold.
How do you explain a country like Ireland that has been a member far longer than the likes of Romania? Another country that was once full of poverty and had massive emigration.
And as I said before, the right is growing in the USA as well, do you blame the EU for that, too?
OK UKIP voter Tony.If that was true we’d have you bleating on for pages and pages about the recent appointment of the U.K.’s top civil servant like you did about Salmayrs appointment at the EU. In fact if anything we’d have more pages because if anything the appointment was done in an even more controversial way than Salmayrs and unlike Salmayrs there doesn’t even look like they’ll be an enquiry into it. Over to you.
There should be another way of taking action against him other than a fine if he is guilty. It may be a lot of money to most of us. But to someone like him it isn't much. The laws are always to the advantage of the rich.Arron Banks campaign and insurance companies now facing fines for breaking data protection laws.
Leave.EU and Banks firm face £135,000 fines
Which proves he lied to the select committee, surely?
OK UKIP voter Tony.
How about showing us all where I have defended anyone who you dislike because they are for Brexit.
There should be another way of taking action against him other than a fine if he is guilty. It may be a lot of money to most of us. But to someone like him it isn't much. The laws are always to the advantage of the rich.
I have gone through it with you before. But you just chat shite on the subject.The old UKIP Tony line again. Still haven’t questioned the decision from May then even though it’s at least on par with the appointment of Salmayr which you’ve bored us to tears with for weeks. Funny, I thought you were impartial and give it out to everyone in equal amounts. Actually I didn’t, as you continue to prove.
So why not test it?The fines are for data protection breaches not lying to a parliamentary select committee. There is course for punishment for doing the latter but as this article explains it’s a grey area and pretty much untested. Lying to a select committee: the law | Owen Bowcott
I have gone through it with you before. But you just chat shite on the subject.
OK. Let's go through the motions again. Mention the person. Show the job they got. Show the UK government rules on getting the post. And mention how high up the position is. Because you make out that it made the fact of Selmayr gettingthe job OK.
Just like when you tried to make out that May got her position without going down the proper way.
Then we will mention Selmayr. We will mention the EU rules and regulations. We will mention that he is in charge of 22,000 civil servants. We will mention that it is counted as the highest position you can have in the EU. We will mention that it is a job for life. We will mention of the blackmail from Juncker if Selmayr was removed from the post.
So why not test it?
If we can send UK MP's to prison for small amounts of false expenses claims we should be able to do the same for breaking rules. Nobody should be above the law.
Have you?I pointed out that Salmayrs appointment was no different to the way that we appoint our leading civil servant. How was that chatting shit exactly given that that has just been proven to be exactly the case? I was bang on. It was you who chatted endless pages of shit on the subject and constantly used it to change directions of conversation onto the EU. And now you’re attempting to do it again.
I said for the rules and regulations being broke. That is different to lies being told.Did you read the article? It tells you the answers in it. Biggest problem is that they don’t answer questions under oath.
You mean the punishments?There should be another way of taking action against him other than a fine if he is guilty. It may be a lot of money to most of us. But to someone like him it isn't much. The laws are always to the advantage of the rich.
Well I for one find it equally disappoining, distasteful & objectionable. Although it is an entirely different circumstance.The old UKIP Tony line again. Still haven’t questioned the decision from May then even though it’s at least on par with the appointment of Salmayr which you’ve bored us to tears with for weeks. Funny, I thought you were impartial and give it out to everyone in equal amounts. Actually I didn’t, as you continue to prove.