The way I see it is that the trust have been criticised for poor communication. CJ is trying hard, and it might be others are blocking his efforts, but we need to work with him to try to change things. He's been on here a long time and has always seemed a reasonable guy. He's clearly trying here, and I appreciate there have been some reasonable suggestions that haven't yet been taken up, just think we need to give him a chance. All I'm going to say on it, not going to get the thread drawn off track having a back & forth over it.
I don't doubt that CJ tries, the thing is the same as what I keep pointing out that it doesn't get any further.
My point was just that if he has no intention of listening to or discussing any of the ideas in the thread it is pointless.
I have discussed things with him and he is a decent lad, it is nothing personal against him directly. I am sure there are others from the Trust who could constructively discuss things.
Some ideas might well be a load of shite, some might have potential (not just this, but things against everybody else or even non protest ideas). An example the other day is the myths articles, a great idea so they were pushed. Straight down the line with facts, no emotion of spin.