Black but not black enough (1 Viewer)

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
What do you guys thing about this latest controversy? A black actor has been chosen for a black role, which you would think would be acceptable. But according to critics, he is too light-skinned! Are we now going to have 'degrees of blackness' and they can only choose someone from the correct group. Seems like it's becoming ridiculous. And this leads to the question, can you be too black for a role that requires a light-skinned black person, or does it only work the other way round?
www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47468011
 

Nick

Administrator
It depends how petty it wants to be. If it is a biography you would think they have to look like them.

If it is a normal story then it wouldn't really be an issue.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
you are missing the point OP

Darker skinned people as in certain communties looked down upon by lighter skinned people of same race. Lighter skinned are also seen as more attractive by mainstream media and thus light skinned actor taking the role is like taking a great opporuntity away from a very dark skinned actor who will not get the chance.

think a black DJ(jameela something) got in hot water about this too and had to apologise for dissing dark skinned women.
 

Nick

Administrator
you are missing the point OP

Darker skinned people as in certain communties looked down upon by lighter skinned people of same race. Lighter skinned are also seen as more attractive by mainstream media and thus light skinned actor taking the role is like taking a great opporuntity away from a very dark skinned actor who will not get the chance.

think a black DJ(jameela something) got in hot water about this too and had to apologise for dissing dark skinned women.

Does it surely not depend on the skin tone of the person the biography is about?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Does it surely not depend on the skin tone of the person the biography is about?
i am sure many films been made where actor looks very different especially if not white. I am just giving my opinion on why this causing uproar
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
I'm whiter than white, me.
 

dancers lance

Well-Known Member
What do you guys thing about this latest controversy? A black actor has been chosen for a black role, which you would think would be acceptable. But according to critics, he is too light-skinned! Are we now going to have 'degrees of blackness' and they can only choose someone from the correct group. Seems like it's becoming ridiculous. And this leads to the question, can you be too black for a role that requires a light-skinned black person, or does it only work the other way round?
www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47468011
Just another example of faux outrage proffered by an ever growing demographic constructed of halfwits.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
You don't see too many ugly people on TV or in films.
Even in a film based on a real person, they always choose an actor who is better looking than the person really was.
Shouldn't ugly people get an opportunity at those roles?
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
yes normal looking people deserve roles

as do dark skin people.

idiotic to gloss this over as pc nonsense, dark skinned people are saying they get lesss opportunities than light skinned black people let alone white people.
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
yes normal looking people deserve roles

as do dark skin people.

idiotic to gloss this over as pc nonsense, dark skinned people are saying they get lesss opportunities than light skinned black people let alone white people.
Where does it end though? Back years ago you had made-up white people playing Asian and Black roles and there was a backlash against that. Nowadays you will never see that. It's always an Asian or a black person. Now the protests are it's the wrong kind of Asian or a person not black enough. Straight actors are no longer allowed to play gay roles whereas we all know gay people have always played straight roles in the past.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Where does it end though? Back years ago you had made-up white people playing Asian and Black roles and there was a backlash against that. Nowadays you will never see that. It's always an Asian or a black person. Now the protests are it's the wrong kind of Asian or a person not black enough. Straight actors are no longer allowed to play gay roles whereas we all know gay people have always played straight roles in the past.
Straight actors gets loads of other acting jobs tho

Dark skinned dont sobwhen a dark skimn role comes its even more galling to see it tigen to light skin
 

JulianDarbyFTW

Well-Known Member
Maybe I'm being naive, but I would expect the role to go to the best person for the job. When Idris Elba was being touted for the role of James Bond, traditionally played by a white man, there was no outcry over his colour, because he was seen as a great candidate. Surely the only way to get rid of racism is to stop persecuting people for the colour of their skin and judge them solely on their merits, yet in this case it seems that some black people are judging other black people for not being black enough. Like I said, perhaps I'm stupid, but I don't see how this type of behaviour helps defeat racist attitudes. Surely this only fosters more hatred and bigotry rather than less?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top