The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (39 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

martcov

Well-Known Member
There will be no people's vote unless its either no deal or treason mays deal

See how Corbyn gets on with his meeting with the opposition. They may put pressure on him to do something together. I think the size of the people’s vote march may show the level of support for a new referendum. It will be hard to deny the support if it is even bigger than the last one.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
But here is the problem I have.

I need us to stay in the EU. But I respected the result. I wasn't a part of the side who won the referendum. Just like each time the Tories get voted in.

A precedent would be set. If we get a vote on anything they fuck about for a few years without implementing what we have voted for so they get the chance to get the result they wanted first time.

I think my preferred ending to this would be for us to leave the EU but for close ties to remain that are as close as possible to what we have now. But even this isn't a good result for anyone. It just seems the best compromise.

It isn’t a good result because we will have no say if we are not in it. If we want to stay close we will have to accept regulations without representation.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
See how Corbyn gets on with his meeting with the opposition. They may put pressure on him to do something together. I think the size of the people’s vote march may show the level of support for a new referendum. It will be hard to deny the support if it is even bigger than the last one.

God help us if he was to ever become PM
 

Grappa

Well-Known Member
With top bantz like remoaners, it's no surprise.

It's seemingly the binary nature of everything nowadays. Pick a side, be it sport, politics, religion and then defend it with all your gusto. No knowledge required other than the other sides are subhuman scum. Just the other day I heard a cubist describe the pre-raphaelite brotherhood as treasonous wankers. So I lamped the fucker.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Wouldn't call it bantz, more along the lines of annoying moaners that can't get their own way
Well at the moment that's the extremist righties, upset that vacuous statements such as Brexit means Brexit are utterly pointless, and worried that their bizarre crusade to thumb a nose at those slightly iffy foreigners across the chanel may not actually happen.

They seem surprised that, after demanding parliament reclaims its power, that parliament doesn't agree with their mentalist vision of the future. They seem surprised that democracy involves finding a ground that more than a minority believe in, a ground that more than a minority will benefit from. They seem amazed that, when throwing away stupid lines like remoaners, they meet an equal and opposite response.

They are the simple, the stupid, the mad. God help us if this flaccid minority ever takes over.
 

martcov

Well-Known Member
God help us if he was to ever become PM

I don’t think he will. His failure to commit to a people’s vote in a definitive way is prolonging the agony. The opportunity is there to unite most of the Labour Party and the opposition, including maybe Tory defectors behind a people’s vote. UKIP has become a right wing islamophobe party, and Farage has become an embarrassment for leave with his poorly planned and executed „march“. It is a metaphore of his „Brexit“. Far from showing why we should Brexit, it shows the lunacy of following populists. The ERG is another embarrassment for many responsible Tories. Someone else in labour will probably take the reins IMO.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
I don’t think he will. His failure to commit to a people’s vote in a definitive way is prolonging the agony. The opportunity is there to unite most of the Labour Party and the opposition, including maybe Tory defectors behind a people’s vote. UKIP has become a right wing islamophobe party, and Farage has become an embarrassment for leave with his poorly planned and executed „march“. It is a metaphore of his „Brexit“. Far from showing why we should Brexit, it shows the lunacy of following populists. The ERG is another embarrassment for many responsible Tories. Someone else in labour will probably take the reins IMO.
Jezza wants to leave the EU
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
I don’t think he will. His failure to commit to a people’s vote in a definitive way is prolonging the agony. The opportunity is there to unite most of the Labour Party and the opposition, including maybe Tory defectors behind a people’s vote. UKIP has become a right wing islamophobe party, and Farage has become an embarrassment for leave with his poorly planned and executed „march“. It is a metaphore of his „Brexit“. Far from showing why we should Brexit, it shows the lunacy of following populists. The ERG is another embarrassment for many responsible Tories. Someone else in labour will probably take the reins IMO.
Many of these "responsible" Tories are inevitably going not to make it through the next general election as their local associations don't reselect them.

UKIP has gone. Disappeared at last election as it was a single issue group and subsequent move to a far right party has seen its support collapse. Even if Brexit were threatened unlikely UKIP could reinvent itself to become the vehicle for people to rally around.
As a country we don't support the far right. Likes of BNP and NF garner next to no support. In proportionate terms UK far right always been behind European counterparts. Likes of FN, AFD, Jobbik etc would never take any level of support in UK.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Many of these "responsible" Tories are inevitably going not to make it through the next general election as their local associations don't reselect them.
FWIW, I find this a very insidious movement in both parties. If an MP was popular enough to be elected, they ought to be allowed the opportunity to defend their seat, at least, unless they've gone full-on mental and/or illegal.

Not having identical views across each party is what keeps the debate healthy, and ensures parliament isn't utterly meaningless other than for automatically passing the government of the day's laws.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I don’t think he will. His failure to commit to a people’s vote in a definitive way is prolonging the agony. The opportunity is there to unite most of the Labour Party and the opposition, including maybe Tory defectors behind a people’s vote. UKIP has become a right wing islamophobe party, and Farage has become an embarrassment for leave with his poorly planned and executed „march“. It is a metaphore of his „Brexit“. Far from showing why we should Brexit, it shows the lunacy of following populists. The ERG is another embarrassment for many responsible Tories. Someone else in labour will probably take the reins IMO.

Why do you keep saying peoples vote? Perhaps you’d like to explain why the Lib Dem’s did yet failed so badly in the last election - most labour MPs are against this
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
Why do you keep saying peoples vote? Perhaps you’d like to explain why the Lib Dem’s did yet failed so badly in the last election - most labour MPs are against this
same principle - if it's about free votes why are Labour threatening to enforce the whip on a 2nd referendum.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Well at the moment that's the extremist righties, upset that vacuous statements such as Brexit means Brexit are utterly pointless, and worried that their bizarre crusade to thumb a nose at those slightly iffy foreigners across the chanel may not actually happen.

They seem surprised that, after demanding parliament reclaims its power, that parliament doesn't agree with their mentalist vision of the future. They seem surprised that democracy involves finding a ground that more than a minority believe in, a ground that more than a minority will benefit from. They seem amazed that, when throwing away stupid lines like remoaners, they meet an equal and opposite response.

They are the simple, the stupid, the mad. God help us if this flaccid minority ever takes over.

giphy.gif
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
FWIW, I find this a very insidious movement in both parties. If an MP was popular enough to be elected, they ought to be allowed the opportunity to defend their seat, at least, unless they've gone full-on mental and/or illegal.

Not having identical views across each party is what keeps the debate healthy, and ensures parliament isn't utterly meaningless other than for automatically passing the government of the day's laws.
problem with this is, Brexit aside, too few politicians will break the whip on other big issues. perhaps the key is to abolish the respective whip offices.
Whatever the wrongs of the former coalition govt (lib dem one) one of the few benefits was to keep many controversial Tory policies from getting through.

As far as MP reselection if they said they would support/oppose Brexit fair enough but if they told constituents pre-selection & election they would follow respective manifestoes then they should have to answer to constituents.

Also as far as insidious goes it's time to remove/reform the undemocratic House of Lords.
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
Remember this? I voted leave btw no second referendum or extension we leave on 29th of this month,Why can’t remoaners get their heads round it?
No deal please
 

Attachments

  • 7DD9C406-180D-4C5C-8DCD-EE6E0EEB14AD.jpeg
    7DD9C406-180D-4C5C-8DCD-EE6E0EEB14AD.jpeg
    132 KB · Views: 12

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
But here is the problem I have.

I need us to stay in the EU. But I respected the result. I wasn't a part of the side who won the referendum. Just like each time the Tories get voted in.

A precedent would be set. If we get a vote on anything they fuck about for a few years without implementing what we have voted for so they get the chance to get the result they wanted first time.

I think my preferred ending to this would be for us to leave the EU but for close ties to remain that are as close as possible to what we have now. But even this isn't a good result for anyone. It just seems the best compromise.

Then surely we’d end up in a weaker position to where we are now? We’d lose our influence yet still be closely tied to the EU. Unless you can elaborate on these close ties?
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
Errr...no we won’t leave on the 29th.

There was also no talk of no deal in the run up to the referendum
So what do you think will happen,There is 3 countries that will vote against an extension.
Poland,Hungary and Italy it only needs one of those!!
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
So what do you think will happen,There is 3 countries that will vote against an extension.
Poland,Hungary and Italy it only needs one of those!!

There is minimal chance of Poland or Hungary going for it and you’re off your heard if you genuinely believe Italy is about to veto it.

There’s zero talk over here in Italy of anything like that happening, not even Salvini would do something so stupid.

I think there will be a long extension followed by a GE or a cross party plan. I still think the EEA could happen.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Perhaps you’d like to explain why the Lib Dem’s did yet failed so badly in the last election
This is a flawed argument. Most MPs across countless parliaments have been all for staying in the EU. Even if we discount the last election as honouring the referendum result, then how about the one before the referendum? The one before that? Are we saying people voted in pro-EU MPs because they were pro EU? If so, why is a referendum democracy, but those numerous votes aren't?

General Elections, of course, are on more than one policy. The Lib Dems have still not (will they ever?) regained trust for falling in with the Tories and betraying many of their voters.

But you knew that.
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
This is a flawed argument. Most MPs across countless parliaments have been all for staying in the EU. Even if we discount the last election as honouring the referendum result, then how about the one before the referendum? The one before that? Are we saying people voted in pro-EU MPs because they were pro EU? If so, why is a referendum democracy, but those numerous votes aren't?

General Elections, of course, are on more than one policy. The Lib Dems have still not (will they ever?) regained trust for falling in with the Tories and betraying many of their voters.

But you knew that.
Didn't the two main parties say in their manifesto's they'd respect the vote?Fcuking snakes!!!
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
there won't be a solitary veto - it would only happen if one of the mini-blocks like Visegrad voted as a group.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
Didn't the two main parties say in their manifesto's they'd respect the vote?Fcuking snakes!!!
what they said they would respect the vote but didn't say how they'd do it.
Even now Corbyn trying to rally support for a Norway agreement. So still wants to go just not in the same way other factions do.
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
I think we will leave with no deal which I want they've had enough time 3 years to get a decent deal.
Be interesting to see if a week on Friday at 22.30 and nothing is sorted,The BBC will be having kittens!!!:happy:
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
what they said they would respect the vote but didn't say how they'd do it.
Even now Corbyn trying to rally support for a Norway agreement. So still wants to go just not in the same way other factions do.
Quite frankly, the idiocy was rushing off straight after the vote. What they should have done (IMNSHO!) is said they respected the vote as the view of the people, and used it to speak to the EU about concerns. Some could have been sorted automatically (immigration etc. We just don't do as much as we can to stop it anyway. We don't use the powers we have inside the EU!), and the negotiating hand of a lost referendum may have helped get some concessions from the EU. If it didn't... then opinion would have hardened against it as an entity, anyway. We could also have discussed what would happen on the event of us leaving.

Then we could have had a binding referendum on the back of those talks, when we had informed views on what the options actually *were*.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I think we will leave with no deal which I want they've had enough time 3 years to get a decent deal.
Be interesting to see if a week on Friday at 22.30 and nothing is sorted,The BBC will be having kittens!!!:happy:

Why do you want no deal?

Wasn’t the whole point of Brexit to allow us to be a global trading nation? But we don’t want a trade deal with our closest and largest market?

I’m gonna say it: you’ve no idea what you’re asking for and just saying whatever your hedge fund masters tell you to want. There was no talk whatsoever of no deal before the result, only since chancers like JRM and Farage who stand to make buckets off the turmoil piped up has anyone been on about it.

Do you also stand to make a mint from the collapse of the UK as an economic power?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top