Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Coventry area. It doesn't say anywhere outside of the City. They must have included the word 'area' for a reason.
EFL Stadium Vote (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter vow
- Start date
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
But Rugby isn't the Coventry area, its the Rugby area.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
It's more the Coventry area than somewhere 50 miles away.
If you're reading 'Coventry area' as being the same as just Coventry, then you're right. I just think they mean somewhere wider than just the City boundaries.
Nick
Administrator
It really isn't that hard to read it. Its saying against a ground share as an alternative to expulsion.
Therefore, it's preferring expulsion.
Nick
Administrator
That's not the option, else it would say "ground share in the Coventry area" to choose.
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
a, Let them move
b, Let them move with a time scale to come back
c, kick them out
Those are the options.
b, Let them move with a time scale to come back
c, kick them out
Those are the options.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Against a ground share outside of the Coventry area.
Nick
Administrator
As an alternative to expulsion.
Therefore, choosing expulsion. Its relative to the other 2 options.
Otherwise it would just say "ground share in Coventry area" as an option.
vow
Well-Known Member
Exactly.
So we'll still be ground sharing regardless of League (or Ricoh, where we're fuckin sharing anyway).
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
How is a CV post code not the Coventry area?
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
So if we move to Rugby there won’t be a single person complaining I assume?
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
Rugby's a positively local CV postcode, too!
Frank Sidebottom
Well-Known Member
No other doesn't. These are all last ditch options.
A) Ground share up to 50 miles away unconditional.
B) Ground share upto 50 miles away conditional on plan to return.
C) If no local groundshare can be agreed you would rather we are expelled from the league than have the club move from the Coventry area next season.
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
It's also saying if we can't find a ground within 50 miles we'll be expelled, so it's asking for your favoured approach. My favoured approach is a ground share in the Coventry area (undefined). Just because you have a favoured approach it doesn't mean the others wouldn't be considered acceptable, and surely no one actually believes the EFL will only put into action the winning survey result.
Nick
Administrator
That isn't an option though? Effectively people are voting for expulsion...
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
I doubt people are voting in such numbers for an expulsion, maybe they just favour the option of a local ground share rather than one further away.
Nick
Administrator
Rusty Trombone
Well-Known Member
Yeah I feel the same, I wish you could read it properly, but hey ho, let's move on.That isn't one of the options, they are voting for expulsion.
SkyBlueCharlie9
Well-Known Member
As a last resort and if all other logical options are exhausted that's a pretty sound idea actually in short term. Not exactly great for fans but better than the worst case scenario. With our away record that would be the longest of all long seasons though!!!
Nick
Administrator
Multiple people are pointing it out to you.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Has ferric oxide entered your brain as well as your instrument. What are you on about?
olderskyblue
Well-Known Member
Reads to me as if Tim Fisher has put this survey together. 50 miles? I'm sure he will be very happy if a majority agree a move of up to 50 miles away.
chiefdave
Well-Known Member
How are people voting for an option that doesn’t exist?
BornSlippySkyBlue
Well-Known Member
It’s actually quite worrying that people are voting for option C — particularly if it is because the (deliberately misleading) question is being misunderstood.
If you combine the ‘anything to get one over on Sisu’ brigade with the ‘don’t understand the question’ brigade we’re probably around the 60% figure seen in the telegraph poll.
Given that a 3 year return isn’t going to happen, in actual fact options B and C are both a vote for expulsion. It even says that on the form.
We’re fucked.
If you combine the ‘anything to get one over on Sisu’ brigade with the ‘don’t understand the question’ brigade we’re probably around the 60% figure seen in the telegraph poll.
Given that a 3 year return isn’t going to happen, in actual fact options B and C are both a vote for expulsion. It even says that on the form.
We’re fucked.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Yes Dave. That’s exactly what I posted. Well done you.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
People are voting for the EFL to threaten Sisu with expulsion in the hope it forces them to deal. You know this. You know 60% of fans don’t want the club expelled.
Nick
Administrator
No, they are voting for expulsion. Whether they just want the threat or not.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
OK.
If you honestly believe 60% of fans want the club expelled from the league I can’t help you.
Nick
Administrator
It is obviously me who isn't needing help, I'm not voting for it or calling for it.
I've also posted examples earlier on in the thread of people who know full well what it means.
Warwickhunt
Well-Known Member
Binley Woods is Rugby
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Christ are you really this stupid?