Not if opinion hadn't changed.
As with you anti-democrats anyway, you try and avoid the fact that it's a vote on an issue now which parliament has not managed to resolve. It is therefore handing the options to the people to decide which is best.
In your dictatorship however, it's down to you and De Pfeffel to ride something through regardless. Some even spend their time with nondescript bollocks and vague twee insults instead of actually offering a constructive argument about why after bills have been scrutinised, there are positives to come from said bill.
Instead, it's the merry-go-round of cheap tomato throwing,