You are actually too stupid to have a real debate with.
Truth hurts does it? Open your eyes instead of resulting to childish remarks. What exactly do you disagree with in my last reply?
Oh I was under the impression we turned up at the ricoh one Saturday and the doors were locked and we'd been thrown out.....poor sisu the victims again. Well at least they got us out of that nasty lease. We're homeless though but that's only a minor technicality.
I’ll bite - I’ll think you’ll find that we mostly blame all parties on here.
Wasps do the council don't. The council don't want to know. Wasps could adjust the terms but they don't want to. You guys don't blame all sides,its all wasps/council/telegraph whoever. Wasps are a symptom of Sisu's mismanagement. Sisu were entitled to carry on with the court action but they knew full well the consequences would be this. This court action has now made us homeless. After the last court defeat for them,they had the option to knock it on the head,they didn't. They decided to chase the dollar in court at the expense of the club.
It's one of the reasons I signed. I got tired of browsing this forum and seeing the same old lines trotted out. You could have a thread on here slagging off wasps with about a hundred replies but if someone chucked a 'yeah but Sisu's actions helped to bring them here' line the usual suspects would be on it like a rash. It's so obvious its laughable.
No the issue is and frustration is proportionality.
ZzzzzzzzzIt isn't though is it? It's you making shit up again like you usually do and jumping on something because somebody else just as misinformed is trying to push something on here.
Have a look through his contradictions
Sisu were the councils preferred option in 2012. So what. We all know why they were. None of us had a crystal ball back then did we. Nobody could of predicted the clusterfuck that was to follow. If sisu would if got us back to the prem after taking over would you all be praising the council? It wasnt just the council that brought sisu here though was it? Once again the club had shot itself in the foot previously by overspending on players like those in your username.
Is that the only word in your vocabulary?
We know all this. We know the council didn't want sell to the other parties. I guess the greedy fuckers expected the arena to be a bit of a gold mine and they needed us to keep on paying that rent to prop up acl. I was actually at the ricoh that day as it was the day we were about to go into administration. There was not much info on sky sports news as Capello took over England that day so I drove over just to see what was going on. I remember a load of suited people standing outside the players entrance having pictures taken etc. I assume that was sisu/council people. I even got interviewed by the telegraph and I remember saying hopefully we can push on ffs. If only I knew of the impending disaster! I'm sure a few of us got taken in a room,lionel bird was there and a few others.
If you understood the part that the council needed us to prop up ACL - can you now see why SISU took the actions they did?
I can to a degree but I don't agree with the way they went about it. That decision has brought us to where we are today. They pushed to hard though. They went to far with the new ground and we don't want the ricoh rhetoric. I guess the sneaky council panicked. Like I said before,wasps approaching the council must of been like a gift from god for the council as they could then wash their hands of the whole mess. Sisu were out sisu'd.
As I said before - I agree, SISU escalated really fast, that’s why the Northampton boycott in my eyes was correct.
Gidney might of been eyeing up wasps but they weren't here then though were they? The gift of an empty stadium must of been like the icing on a cake for gidney and wasps. If wed of remained as Tenants and not gone to Northampton then maybe we could of done something to stop wasps move here? They'll eventually fuck off? They've been here 12 years now and they show no signs of leaving. Is there any other club in this country that's had the same owners longer than that? And no I wont be going to Birmingham sorry.
At the moment? I make it 18 years and counting that CCFC fora have been rife with ownership bollocks!
"If SISU never broke the rent agreement of about 1.2million a year we would have gone bust by now."
And the reason was that the council were going to do it to get there money back so SISU done it first. It was still caused by that rental agreement and the council.
Yes they did know but as the councils preferred bidder probably though they could renegotiate at a later point. As you said 5 mins to go so no time to arrange it with the council first. Regardless are you saying that it was a fair and good deal for the club and they should have stayed with it or do you agree that it had to change to ensure the clubs future? How it was done is not up for debate, we all agree it was wrong BUT if the council were playing hard ball was that the last option. If other options available PLEASE EMLIGHTEN ME.
Sisu did a due diligence process when they acquired the club, so the rental agreement was obviously part of that.
Yes they did but as above they had 5 mins to do the deal. Read what i posted above as i can't be arsed to retype it.
Sod it, here you d¡go i've copied and pasted. Yes they did know but as the councils preferred bidder probably though they could renegotiate at a later point. As Wince said 5 mins to go so no time to arrange it with the council first.
