General Election 2019 thread (5 Viewers)

W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
You socialists keep banging on about austerity but cannot make any inroads into Boris’s,The Conservatives and unionists lead in the polls.
If he was that bad you’d be heading for a landslide but it could go the other way.
What does that say about Corbyn and his socialist policies? If Corbyn was the messiah how come people seem to be rejecting him and his party.
Because If he cannot win after 10 years of so called austerity will labour ever govern again?
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
.
23f491e8a7ff7a83e21c09dcd3cc58ff.jpg


Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
You socialists keep banging on about austerity but cannot make any inroads into Boris’s,The Conservatives and unionists lead in the polls.
If he was that bad you’d be heading for a landslide but it could go the other way.
What does that say about Corbyn and his socialist policies? If Corbyn was the messiah how come people seem to be rejecting him and his party.
Because If he cannot win after 10 years of so called austerity will labour ever govern again?

You do see the irony in adding the 'Unionist' part of that title, right? In any case-the fat one has made this all about Brexit when we could've had a referendum before now. He's a pro charlatan who knows how to appeal to the moronic majority. And he's worked it a treat.
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
You do see the irony in adding the 'Unionist' part of that title, right? In any case-the fat one has made this all about Brexit when we could've had a referendum before now. He's a pro charlatan who knows how to appeal to the moronic majority. And he's worked it a treat.
We had a referendum and leave won!!!
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
You socialists keep banging on about austerity but cannot make any inroads into Boris’s,The Conservatives and unionists lead in the polls.
If he was that bad you’d be heading for a landslide but it could go the other way.
What does that say about Corbyn and his socialist policies? If Corbyn was the messiah how come people seem to be rejecting him and his party.
Because If he cannot win after 10 years of so called austerity will labour ever govern again?

Because people don’t give a fuck. The spirt and endeavour that existed in this country post WW2 is lost to history forever.
 
W

westcountry_skyblue

Guest
Do you think the union is more or less secure with a shit Brexit and a right wing majority in Parliament?
Yes rather so called right wing parliament than a socialist/left wing one.Where does socialism work in the world? It’s fantasy politics by Steptoe and his comrades.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Diane Abbott must have done the sums for the Tory manifesto.

The independent charity Full Facthas scrutinised today’s Conservative manifesto launch.

On the cost of new nurses, of which the manifesto promises 50,000, Full Fact calculates that 50,000 extra nurses at pay band 5 (£24,000 per annum) would cost the NHS £2.8bn a year, when factoring in the costs of national insurance, pensions and training. The Conservatives claim their policy will cost the NHS £879m in 2023/24.

#magicmoneytree they’re best part of £2B out. That’s shocking.
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Yes rather so called right wing parliament than a socialist/left wing one.Where does socialism work in the world? It’s fantasy politics by Steptoe and his comrades.

whereas your explanation is fantasy daily mail bingo. Lots of countries in Europe are successful with a democratic socialist approach (Scandinavian countries) - Labour’s ideas aren’t even considered left-wing in countries that aren’t mental like ours.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
On increased spending, the manifesto pledges £3bn of extra day-to-day spending by the final years of the next parliament - a figure that looks considerably smaller than pledges from other parties. But these figures aren’t necessarily comparable - the Conservatives did not include costings for every pledge in the manifesto; only for new spending announcements made since the election was called. So while the Conservatives plan to increase annual current spending by £3bn compared to what’s already been announced, the overall annual extra spend will be much higher than that. For example, the manifesto spending list omits its headline pledges on school funding, the NHS, and police officers.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yes rather so called right wing parliament than a socialist/left wing one.Where does socialism work in the world? It’s fantasy politics by Steptoe and his comrades.

Avoiding the point. Boris' deal has royally pissed off the unionists in NI while Sturgeon is begging for Brexit to be as shit as possible so it boosts her independence case. The fat twat might take 2 countries out of the union in one go.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
.
23f491e8a7ff7a83e21c09dcd3cc58ff.jpg


Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Considering it was 74.6% and climbing in 2010.......And Labour were in power in 2010.
The Tories wouldn't have made much difference that quickly.
So why didn't the numbers even show that spending was going down before Labour took over? After all don't we like to have a go at austerity on here?
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Do you think the union is more or less secure with a shit Brexit and a right wing majority in Parliament?

More than with a hung parliament and sturgeon pulling the strings of a leader whose whole adult life has wanted a United Ireland? Without question not that I care that much on the issue
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
No...they have a magic money tree. Labour have found a whole forest of them

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
The Tories are £2B short on their nurse recruitment pledge alone. That’s before you even get into that 19K of those “new” 50K of nurses are existing nurses so actually they’re only pledging 31K new nurses.

They’ve also omitted from their manifesto spending commitments already made whereas other parties have included them. Only the other parties have outlined plans on how they’re going to raise that money as well.
 

Philosoraptor

Well-Known Member
I think moving the nukes to Coventry canal basin was just an afterthought.

 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You don't care if the UK breaks up? Wow

Well anyone who votes Labour certainly doesn’t - labour confirmed they will give a referendum to the Scots and will clearly want a unified Ireland - so you clearly don’t
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Well anyone who votes Labour certainly doesn’t - labour confirmed they will give a referendum to the Scots and will clearly want a unified Ireland - so you clearly don’t

You just said you don't care either way. Unlike you I have actually voted to keep the union in tact when Salmond posed the question in 2014. The GFA mandates that a Irish reunification will only happen when a majority exists in NI for it to happen. Neither Corbyn nor Varadkar can force them out.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You just said you don't care either way. Unlike you I have actually voted to keep the union in tact when Salmond posed the question in 2014. The GFA mandates that a Irish reunification will only happen when a majority exists in NI for it to happen. Neither Corbyn nor Varadkar can force them out.

the surrender agreement allows a referendum every 7 years if the Irish Parliament sanction it. Read it - I have several times
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
the surrender agreement allows a referendum every 7 years if the Irish Parliament sanction it. Read it - I have several times

Which is meaningless if there remains a unionist majority. If there isn't, why is it still part of the country? The UK government has left it to fester for decades and you by your own admission aren't bothered. So why cling to it if the majority's gone?
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
the surrender agreement allows a referendum every 7 years if the Irish Parliament sanction it. Read it - I have several times
According to Northern Ireland’s loyalist community the surrender agreement is Boris’ Brexit deal with a border in the Irish Sea.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Which is meaningless if there remains a unionist majority. If there isn't, why is it still part of the country? The UK government has left it to fester for decades and you by your own admission aren't bothered. So why cling to it if the majority's gone?

democracy rules. I would not stand in the way of a referendum - I suspect Corbyn won’t and I suspect Johnson will so I guess you are with Bojo on this one?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
democracy rules. I would not stand in the way of a referendum - I suspect Corbyn won’t and I suspect Johnson will so I guess you are with Bojo on this one?

Taking aside how the unionists have reacted to Boris' watered down May deal, I'd base it on whether or not there is still a unionist majority over there. Still it's odd for a patent British nationalist like yourself to not be bothered about the Union breaking. For some reason Sturgeon still can't get a Yes majority in the polls right now so that should be refused until it definitively changes.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Yes rather so called right wing parliament than a socialist/left wing one.Where does socialism work in the world? It’s fantasy politics by Steptoe and his comrades.
We had Corbyn's version of socialism practically for 34 years after the second world war, including the longest spell of economic growth ever. Are you really this thick?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Considering it was 74.6% and climbing in 2010.......And Labour were in power in 2010.
The Tories wouldn't have made much difference that quickly.
So why didn't the numbers even show that spending was going down before Labour took over? After all don't we like to have a go at austerity on here?
Factor in that this is 9 years of austerity and there has apparently been growth in GDP for most of those years
 

Walsgrave

Well-Known Member
No details of how the withdrawal agreement will be negotiated/its terms in the Conservative manifesto. Far from getting Brexit done (which mind you they have been promising since 2016), we will have more of the same dithering - they will not be able to negotiate an amicable agreement with the EU so I'm afraid it will either be no deal or BoJo will call another election within a few years to true and navigate his way out of a gridlocked Parliament. As if we have not seen this before...
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Factor in that this is 9 years of austerity and there has apparently been growth in GDP for most of those years
I have an idea. Let's vote in a party that will spend hundreds of billions and send the debt through the roof. We could all celebrate that.

The good thing is we could always blame Brexit .
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
No details of how the withdrawal agreement will be negotiated/its terms in the Conservative manifesto. Far from getting Brexit done (which mind you they have been promising since 2016), we will have more of the same dithering - they will not be able to negotiate an amicable agreement with the EU so I'm afraid it will either be no deal or BoJo will call another election within a few years to true and navigate his way out of a gridlocked Parliament. As if we have not seen this before...
Have you been asleep?

The Tories have already got an agreement with the EU.

How about try this one.

No details of how the withdrawal agreement will be negotiated/its terms in the Labour manifesto.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top