Do you know what a hostile takeover is?
Hostile Takeover
Well I’m this context you clearly don’t.
You’ve tried to equate the process in a public floated company to that of a private one.
All the shares are owned by one company and not available on the open market do distress in that way is not possible?
The actions that are possible have happened.
- introduction to the City by a Third party of a competitor for customers
- the third party offering significant support to the competitor and assisting in media presence
- allowing the purchase to that competitor of shares to the shared venue at a price and on terms which heavily favour them against the original tenant
The competitor has then:
- Introduced clauses into a contract which it knows will result in the company not accepting the offer
- negotiated terms of agreement for access to the stadium with a party interested in buying the competitor (this of course has happened on more than one occasion)
- though not proven strong evidence the owner of the competitor was part of the consortium
And so it goes on.
There are clear and obvious stew it’s to force a sale by actions which try to render the club unable to function under its present owner
That’s what a hostile takeover is exactly
Your constant denial or ignorance of basic facts is curious