CWR (12 Viewers)

[Grendel]

I did hear it. I got the impression it was someone who has conversations with him on this issue. I think it’s more likely to be Nick. Probably is him or me.

If he said changing handles it would I guess be @flemoil

 

---

[Grendel]

Another tweet sent asking CCFC if Mr Linnells comments are accurate and that their message on their site is no longer accurate

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

Anyone Else interested in what the trust will come out with after this?

 

[SkyBlueDom26]

I’m sorry I would have asked bout the document signed before the talks if I’d remembered. I hope I didn’t come across as a Sisu stooge was just wanting to ensure Clive couldn’t point fingers without being challenged on what he thought the club could do

Well done Pete, we may not agree on everything but fair play to ya calling him out... you can tell he was trying to get you off quickly

 

[Grendel]

Anyone Else interested in what the trust will come out with after this?

Some suck up to wasps drivel I’d guess

 

[Sky Blue Harry H]

I’ve sent a message those who follow me retweet it - it’s carefully worded and polite

G- what is your twitter name/account, if it's appropriate to ask on here?

 

[chiefdave]

Once again CWR manage to be worse than my already low expectations. For months whenever the Ricoh has been mentioned the first thing people have said is about the indemnity. Surely then if you had the slightest suspicion that was no longer the case you'd follow it up. If for no other reason that getting that confirmation would be a big story for you to break.

 

[MusicDating]

Well done Pete, we may not agree on everything but fair play to ya calling him out... you can tell he was trying to get you off quickly

This ^ I'll try and listen to a download later, but fair play Pete. This thread is a great example of coordinated fan action. Putting aside previous disagreements on other issues to focus on the key issue of the moment.

 

[Grendel]

G- what is your twitter name/account, if it's appropriate to ask on here?

@magnuhorse I describe it as my sophisticated side of social media identities

 

[wince]

I’m sorry I would have asked bout the document signed before the talks if I’d remembered. I hope I didn’t come across as a Sisu stooge was just wanting to ensure Clive couldn’t point fingers without being challenged on what he thought the club could do

You came across very well mate good straight question that couldn't be batted away well done

 

[Nick]

CJ said the other week that they quizzed wasps on it when they met them? He didn't say wasps said there wasn't one.

Clive also said there was one and it was Wasps stance and they think it's fair.

Somebody is bullshitting.

 

[Tommo1993]

Missed it. Kudos though :emoji_thumbsup:

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

CJ said the other week that they quizzed wasps on it when they met them? He didn't say wasps said there wasn't one.

Somebody is bullshitting.

I understood him saying that this wasn’t holding up any deal but Sisu and ccfc promising no more legal action against wasps

 

[shepardo01]

CJ said the other week that they quizzed wasps on it when they met them? He didn't say wasps said there wasn't one.

Somebody is bullshitting.

If it had been removed, the trust and CovTel would be all over it whipping up an anti SISU frenzy.

 

[Nick]

I understood him saying that this wasn’t holding up any deal but Sisu and ccfc promising no more legal action against wasps

The last thing was that they signed something to say there wouldn't be.

Maybe Stuart can confirm which legal action there is against wasps?

 

[RegTheDonk]

Just tweeted Neil to ask what the Trust can do to persuade Wasps to drop the clause and allow us back to the Ricoh. I'll let you know if i get a response!

You'd have more luck asking him for a game of Hungry Hungry Hippos.

 

[shepardo01]

I understood him saying that this wasn’t holding up any deal but Sisu and ccfc promising no more legal action against wasps

The already have and did, signed and sealed.....
Then appeared the indemnity when the complainant against THE COUNCIL became common knowledge (well, after discussing a deal for a bit whilst knowing about the complaint!)

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

The already have and did, signed and sealed.....
Then appeared the indemnity when the complainant against THE COUNCIL became common knowledge (well, after discussing a deal for a bit whilst knowing about the complaint!)

Yep

 

[shepardo01]

Sent this in by text - did it get read? (Missed chunks whilst putting my boys to bed)
Wont be the first time similar texts of mine have not been read out if not...

CW Stuart, there IS an indemnity clause asking that CCFC pay if anything found a-miss in EU complaint... if it gets that far. Why should CCFC foot any bill that should be between Wasps/council. Eastwood said that Wasps would welcome CCFC back if legals dropped. He/you/everyone knows they cant drop EU complaint. (Which isn't even against Wasps! It's against Council!) CCFC signed to say they would not litigate against Wasps. Complaint is against council. Wasps MOVED the goalposts by inserting indemnity and saying no deal. CCFC CANNOT do anything to change stanz/back down. WASPS CAN!

 

[RegTheDonk]

You came across very well Pete - no ranting and (first and foremost) praised how well the team are doing on the pitch. I always envisage you as the other Pete who gets on after most matches.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

You came across very well Pete - no ranting and (first and foremost) praised how well the team are doing on the pitch. I always envisage you as the other Pete who gets on after most matches.

Oh no! Although I’m from cheylesmore too

 

[Mild-Mannered Janitor]

Maybe we have to boycott the calls on a Friday, hit him where it hurts, not much of a programme without callers or we need to all call in and repeat the points from the previous caller to see if he gets it

 

[Sick Boy]

No one will. The real fly in the ointment here is the real possibility of promotion

Spot on, they’re going to be gutted if we go up.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

The last thing was that they signed something to say there wouldn't be.

Maybe Stuart can confirm which legal action there is against wasps?

I think he was saying there is none but club and Sisu need to promise there won’t be any . Maybe for a second time

 

[Mild-Mannered Janitor]

Promotion has to be great for SISU as it does open up the potential for International buyers who are only interested in being one step away from the holy grail of the premiership, you can see this trend with the buyers of other championship clubs.

 

[Frostie]

Maybe we have to boycott the calls on a Friday, hit him where it hurts, not much of a programme without callers or we need to all call in and repeat the points from the previous caller to see if he gets it

They have very few anyway, they actively chase people who post on social media & ask them to call up.

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

You can only do what you can do. And between us we could genuinely occupy the lines on match day/Friday/Monday phone ins and all ask the questions that need answering.

 

[CanadianCCFC]

Did Linnell say/imply that there was never an indemnity clause or that there’s no indemnity clause anymore?

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

Did Linnell say/imply that there was never an indemnity clause or that there’s no indemnity clause anymore?

Both really. But ended by saying that wasps had changed tact on that clause. Lots of contradiction and backtracking all told.

 

[Brighton Sky Blue]

Both really. But ended by saying that wasps had changed tact on that clause. Lots of contradiction and backtracking all told.

Two possibilities in that case

1. He doesn’t know what he’s on about

2. He’s confusing the party line from the insects

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

If there wasn’t an indemnity clause, I’m sure this would have been made public.
After all, if there isn’t - we move onto SISUp

 

[Paul Anthony]

We surely know there was an indemnity clause for one very simple reason.

If there never was an indemnity clause, Wasps would have been all over it when it came out about it. On this matter, their silence has been thunderous.

 

[Frostie]

We surely know there was an indemnity clause for one very simple reason.

If there never was an indemnity clause, Wasps would have been all over it when it came out about it. On this matter, their silence has been thunderous.

Exactly. Seems everyone knows it but our Stuart unless there's been some very recent developments he knows but I think we all know that isn't the case.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Any replies Grendel?

 

[Grendel]

Any replies Grendel?

Not from him no. I asked Eakin as well and no. Linnell is online as he’s talking about the cricket.

One poster did say that there marble something in it as that supports the rumours of a return but doesn’t know any more.

Oh and it’s sent Ginetta into a tail spin with frantic posts about Sisu being the devil and wasps are great