The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (256 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Many reasons which you already know, also because all your fellow right wing guys spent years telling us they’d have massive trade deals set up within 24 hours of Brexit happening. In other words, to further demonstrate the lies, deceit and bullshit emanating from your Brexit buddies.

Out of interest why am I “right wing”?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The vast majority of comments about Hopkins is what a vile creature she is. She relies more on upsetting the left than giving a voice to the right for her job - that is why she does it and makes massively inflammatory statements. It's anger against her that keeps her relevant, not those agreeing with her.

Is she banned? I used to follow her.
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
The vast majority of comments about Hopkins is what a vile creature she is. She relies more on upsetting the left than giving a voice to the right for her job - that is why she does it and makes massively inflammatory statements. It's anger against her that keeps her relevant, not those agreeing with her.
I think, and might be wrong, I read that she got funding from South Africa, Israel & USA, and was essentially a mouthpiece for some very dark forces?
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Where has this drowning babies bollocks come from? Is this to do with throw away comment I made about shooting the dinghy? No I wouldn't want them to drown,I'd prefer them to seek refuge(if theyre genuine) in the 1st safe country they come to instead of weirdly trying to make it to the uk and avoiding countless countries in between. This is so typical of weird leftie types like yourself. We're not allowed to bring up legitimate concerns about immigration without mentalists like you screaming racist etc.
I guess the Brexit vote was a protest vote to a degree as people in this country are sick and tired of being bullied by your type ie the rabid left.
I've no problem with controlled immigration. We need migrants. What's so wrong about limiting the people that come here? What's so wrong about us picking the ones with the best skills? Why should the tax payers of this country pay for work shy scroungers from abroad? We have enough home grown trash all ready here. You know the white working class people of this country are being gagged by people like you. We cant fart without you lot frothing at the mouth.
As far as I can see there's only one racist biggot on this thread. It isnt me,it isn't ernie,it isnt grendel.

Throw away comment lol

'We should have sunk the boats'

'Yeah well would you be willing to take the people the lifeguards save into your house?'
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I stand corrected- America, Australia and South Africa according to the woman herself Katie Hopkins forced to rely on foreigners to fund her work as she loses home

She was banned I think for her spat with Stormsy. It’s a breach of freedom of speech rules in my view. She is of course a rather silly person but actually the banning of her was not sensible. Curiously I’m sure Rachel Riley is complained and this was upheld yet Ms Riley’s attempts to silence the left on anti semitism was less successful
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
She was banned I think for her spat with Stormsy. It’s a breach of freedom of speech rules in my view. She is of course a rather silly person but actually the banning of her was not sensible. Curiously I’m sure Rachel Riley is complained and this was upheld yet Ms Riley’s attempts to silence the left on anti semitism was less successful
The countdown woman, right? Yes I think it was her and someone else that put up posts saying they were the ones that got her shut down.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
She was banned I think for her spat with Stormsy. It’s a breach of freedom of speech rules in my view. She is of course a rather silly person but actually the banning of her was not sensible. Curiously I’m sure Rachel Riley is complained and this was upheld yet Ms Riley’s attempts to silence the left on anti semitism was less successful

I totally agree about Hopkins as much as I hate her.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
She was banned I think for her spat with Stormsy. It’s a breach of freedom of speech rules in my view. She is of course a rather silly person but actually the banning of her was not sensible. Curiously I’m sure Rachel Riley is complained and this was upheld yet Ms Riley’s attempts to silence the left on anti semitism was less successful

While I generally agree, Twitter's a private business that can ban who it likes and you know that when you sign up. When you dedicate your life to writing filth and trying to antagonise groups of society you can have few complaints when it comes around full circle. It's surprising she wasn't banned sooner
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Posted it earlier.
Post it again then. Don't believe anyone would actuvely say they'd hold children's heads underwater to drown them. Sounds like the usual false moral high ground hysteria to me. Where's Terry Christian when you need him ?
 
Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
She was banned I think for her spat with Stormsy. It’s a breach of freedom of speech rules in my view. She is of course a rather silly person but actually the banning of her was not sensible. Curiously I’m sure Rachel Riley is complained and this was upheld yet Ms Riley’s attempts to silence the left on anti semitism was less successful

Which “freedom of speech rules” forbid private companies having a usage policy exactly?
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
If you think I’m going to spend all day pulling particles about racism in England then I have better things to do, there are thousands every day and would take months to catalogue. I have facts on my side and the ever present sight of a racist government and racist society in the midst of an attempt to roll back the years to 1973 with people such as yourself aiding and abetting it.

This is hilarious...you couldn't make up this kind of crap.
 

The coventrian

Well-Known Member
Throw away comment lol

'We should have sunk the boats'

'Yeah well would you be willing to take the people the lifeguards save into your house?'
It no different to what a lot of people really think when they see it on the telly though is it?
Would I be willing to take any of them in? Would I fuck and I guarantee all your fellow do gooders on here wouldn't either. I'd put them all on the next plane back to where they came from.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Which “freedom of speech rules” forbid private companies having a usage policy exactly?

A usage policy that selectively allows some users liberty to express unpleasant views and not others. It has specific rules but only acts in such rules when it fells it’s appropriate to do so
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
It no different to what a lot of people really think when they see it on the telly though is it?
Would I be willing to take any of them in? Would I fuck and I guarantee all your fellow do gooders on here wouldn't either. I'd put them all on the next plane back to where they came from.
"So we should have sunk their boats"
Is that what you actually said ? No mention of holding children's heads underwater to drown therm ?
Someone's slightly exaggerating the point just to create squealing hysteria if that's true. Dear oh dear.
 

The coventrian

Well-Known Member
"So we should have sunk their boats"
Is that what you actually said ? No mention of holding children's heads underwater to drown therm ?
Someone's slightly exaggerating the point just to create hysteria if that's true. Dear oh dear.
Yeah that was it. A throw away comment that's been taken out of context as usual by the hysterical liberals on here.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Which “freedom of speech rules” forbid private companies having a usage policy exactly?

The cry "freedom of speech" usually translates to complaining they aren't allowed to spout their racism.
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Yeah that was it. A throw away comment that's been taken out of context as usual by the hysterical liberals on here.
Thought as much. Terry Christian and his mates giving it the big one .
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Yeah that was it. A throw away comment that's been taken out of context as usual by the hysterical liberals on here.

Hysterical liberals = decent people
 

Ring Of Steel

Well-Known Member
While I generally agree, Twitter's a private business that can ban who it likes and you know that when you sign up. When you dedicate your life to writing filth and trying to antagonise groups of society you can have few complaints when it comes around full circle. It's surprising she wasn't banned sooner
Agreed- there is a line and she crossed it. All for free speech if it doesn’t incite racial, homophobic etc hatred, and that goes both ways.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Truth hurts,eh? After all, you regularly go on about Corbyn being pro Brexit and his pro IRA beliefs.

Corbyn was aiming to be Pm not a minor MEP in a party that if it achieved its objective would cease to exist very soon after inception
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top