Coronavirus (36 Viewers)

Forums New posts
fernandopartridge

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
dubed said:
Mean estimate 61 m so 0.8% mortality. That pandemic disproportionately affected the young, as it had developed from a common strain to which older people had some immunity. So, roughly 1% of the world's population caught the disease, of which 1% died as either a direct or co-morbid result of the virus.
Click to expand...

Thanks
 
Alan Dugdales Moustache

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
Rugby Free school.hsve just put out a statement to say that one of their students has been confirmed as having Corona virus.
He'd been to northern Italy and then come home and self isolated for two weeks. He returned to school only to feel unwell and had it confirmed a couple of days later.
In a week or so no one will bat an eyelid as it'll be a very common event I suppose.
 
Flying Fokker

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
wingy said:
There are many claimed.
It may take an authoritarian regime without constraints to get Tests through at the earliest.
Click to expand...
The trouble is, they have to work and safely. Although there are plenty of subjects around to volunteer.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
Interesting contrasts starting to present.
Italy South Korea virtually identical numbers atm .
Mortality 6 times higher in Italy .
Likewise France and Germany.
0 deaths in Germany 19 in France.
 
Wyken Sky Blue

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
There's a sports minister meeting today to discuss playing games behind closed doors.

I really don't know the outcome but wouldn't be suprised if crowds are prevented from attending the rest of March's games.

It's true what's been said though on this thread, if fans won't gather in a stadium they'll gather in a pub or any other social setting.

If they are serious about it then they should follow what Italy are doing. However 3 deaths in nealrly 300 cases with all those that have died having poor immunity isn't what I class as alarming.

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
 
Sky Blue Pete

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Macca said:
My biggest concern is how the old or physically vulnerable are seen as disposable. It’s ok cos only some old or sick people will die. Maybe they weren’t ready to die. Surely anything that hastens death against peoples will should be taken seriously. What next? Rare form of cancer, meh leave them do it it’s only one in a thousand
Click to expand...
It’s not that all of those people are at risk of the flu which would cause them very similar issues. So we should absolutely encourage good personal hygiene with hands and face and be sensible and reasonable with everything else
 
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
skyblue1991 said:
There's a sports minister meeting today to discuss playing games behind closed doors.

I really don't know the outcome but wouldn't be suprised if crowds are prevented from attending the rest of March's games.

It's true what's been said though on this thread, if fans won't gather in a stadium they'll gather in a pub or any other social setting.

If they are serious about it then they should follow what Italy are doing. However 3 deaths in nealrly 300 cases with all those that have died having poor immunity isn't what I class as alarming.

Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

To be fair the government/health officials have balanced risk/panic reasonably well so far with regard to events etc.

I’d imagine there will be some guidance that people above a certain age or with prior existing conditions shouldn’t be going, which is sensible as people’s health is more important than attending.

ps the coughing without covering mouths, and those still still not washing hands etc are probably the same selfish fuckers who are buying up 200 bogrolls at a time, just incase ! If everyone maintains good personal hygiene we’ve got a chance of limiting the spread, which in turn will save lives, it’s not rocket science.
 
Marty

Marty

Well-Known Member
wingy said:
Bloodbath on the stock market
Oil down to£30 a barrel
Click to expand...

Phenomenal price for the big oilers today, I'll be picking up a load more of Shell once I get home, get the average down to roughly 1450, Should see me right for a fair few years.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Marty said:
Phenomenal price for the big oilers today, I'll be picking up a load more of Shell once I get home, get the average down to roughly 1450, Should see me right for a fair few years.
Click to expand...
got in at 1250-1257 today (though tbf just evens out some that I bought at 1650)
wingy said:
Oil down to£30 a barrel
Click to expand...
yes but not virus related
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Marty

Marty

Well-Known Member
dubed said:
got in at 1250-1257 today (though tbf just evens out some that I bought at 1650)

yes but not virus related
Click to expand...

Bargain pricing, I've been having a serious look at getting more of Lloyds today, if you buy at current pricing, going off the previous years it'll be paying out over a 5% dividend.

Some great value to be had.
 
C

Cov City Daytrader 87

Well-Known Member
Halftime Orange said:
Billions have been wiped off the FTSE, someone is making an absolute ton of cash from this 'crisis'...let's hope its SISU and they have a ton of left over funds to park somewhere.
Click to expand...

Maybe they used some of the money to short the markets and (who knows) maybe made money from the falling markets.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
Ring Of Steel said:
What is he actually trying to say?
Click to expand...
That life is cheap.
Might be afraid that the Hoi polloi might catch on that the efforts of their labour is worth more than they get .
Ffs didn't want to dissembark that cruise cos he was worried about his stats.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 37 (members: 0, guests: 37)
Top