Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (105 Viewers)

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I would have loved to have just got my estimated grades with some generosity with no exams and revision.

Will they be paying you overtime for working over Easter too?

No and we might be down to statutory pay.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Stepping up testing to 25,000 a day, it is obvious that if that is ramped up then confirmed cases will go up compared to when they were testing say 5,000.

Everything that is happening is reactive, proactive early testing might have helped stop the spread. It's a bit late now, rather than testing where the leak came from we're measuring how much water is being lost.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
*runs*

ETaxcElXYAY4L12
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Another genius post from David! You may have noticed that there is something happening out there?
No I was talking why a lot the planes flying will still be flying.

If you had taken some time off from trying to noshoff Richard Branson you would not look so stupid.
 

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Well-Known Member
Exactly.

Then what if (hopefully it doesn't happen) your son has it after you and your wife think you have had it. What if he gets a bit of a cough?

There's no way to know without testing every single person. Even then, if somebody tests negative they may catch it the day after.

What worries me is that these people on the TV aren't talking about days or weeks, on TV just now somebody was saying "this time next year we might be through the worst of it".

How does this happen in 2020?
Without meaning to put a dampener on it and be overly negative, if you read the Imperial College piece on it, they seem to be predicting 18 months. I am not saying that's right and I am sure the usual suspects will find someone who has said it will be done in 2 weeks. But people far more qualified in it than I am have managed to come to the conclusion that it will only be over when we have a vaccine. Perhaps not worth worrying about as there isn't a lot we can do, but worth preparing for.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Without meaning to put a dampener on it and be overly negative, if you read the Imperial College piece on it, they seem to be predicting 18 months. I am not saying that's right and I am sure the usual suspects will find someone who has said it will be done in 2 weeks. But people far more qualified in it than I am have managed to come to the conclusion that it will only be over when we have a vaccine. Perhaps not worth worrying about as there isn't a lot we can do, but worth preparing for.

Like with China, yes there are no cases but has a large scale of immunity been built? If the restrictions are lifted there will surely be another outbreak therefore without a vaccine this could become a repetitive thing
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Without meaning to put a dampener on it and be overly negative, if you read the Imperial College piece on it, they seem to be predicting 18 months. I am not saying that's right and I am sure the usual suspects will find someone who has said it will be done in 2 weeks. But people far more qualified in it than I am have managed to come to the conclusion that it will only be over when we have a vaccine. Perhaps not worth worrying about as there isn't a lot we can do, but worth preparing for.
Wasn't the imperial study plugging reported death rates into their flu pandemic simulation for transmission without intervention?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Like with China, yes there are no cases but has a large scale of immunity been built? If the restrictions are lifted there will surely be another outbreak therefore without a vaccine this could become a repetitive thing
You could see the restrictions in a country be lifted then reimposed in cycles until a vaccine is produced
 

GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Well-Known Member
Wasn't the imperial study plugging reported death rates into their flu pandemic simulation for transmission without intervention?
It was for both. It showed what it looked like it there was zero intervention and what happens if there was intervention. It gave you astronomical deaths with zero intervention and then the amount they reckon they could save with measures like isolation. The overall summary was that the only way it would be stopped would be via vaccine though, and it takes 14 months to test a vaccine to ensure there are no fatal side affects (no idea how they come up with 14 months?!)
 

steve cooper

Well-Known Member
One possible positive is how long in reality a vaccine will take to become available. The timescale being talked about takes into account extensive testing and gaining approval to use it. But will all countries abide by the rules? or will some countries roll out a vaccine anyway in the next few months. Other countries would still have to be satisfied on the safety of a vaccine but would have a much better idea of effectiveness of various vaccines should this happen.
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
You could see the restrictions in a country be lifted then reimposed in cycles until a vaccine is produced

Yes, as has been mentioned here, this is what China is doing now by lifting the lockdown. Medical workers are now leaving Wuhan as there are very few cases to deal with.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Am I missing something with the scale on the left hand side. You can’t change a scale half way up surely!!!??

Oh no, not this again!

It's a logarithmic scale and is explained on the guy's twitter feed why he uses it. But basically:

"In the initial outbreak phase, a virus like this spreads exponentially not arithmetically, i.e a log scale is the natural way to track the spread"


Also...

The graph would be unreadable on a linear scale:

"2) If we show case numbers on a linear scale, it would look like UK, US etc have little to worry about: they’re down here and Italy is way up there! You’d also be asking readers to calculate an exponential curve in their head to see if two countries are on the same trajectory ???"


ES1d2TGWkAA2Lam
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
David,(me suppressing a smirk) flights are not happening becausing of slots being lost.
but I am having a mare? Dribble dribble David.
Q. Why do you look stupid David
A. Refer to above
They were mate, the uk government wrote to the eu about it. It's a fact mate sorry but you've fucked this one up.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Briefly from here:

1. We will be open for all of Easter under the same arrangements as the next few weeks.

2. Teachers are likely to be asked to provide grades for GCSE and A level students.

3. Due to the right to appeal being maintained we have been asked to estimate as high a grade as realistically possible.

I can’t describe how I feel at this moment but I have already bollocked students celebrating what is going on.

This is just a lottery system and I don’t see how it will work as universities will just be over subscribed
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Oh no, not this again!

It's a logarithmic scale and is explained on the guy's twitter feed why he uses it. But basically:

"In the initial outbreak phase, a virus like this spreads exponentially not arithmetically, i.e a log scale is the natural way to track the spread"


Also...

The graph would be unreadable on a linear scale:

"2) If we show case numbers on a linear scale, it would look like UK, US etc have little to worry about: they’re down here and Italy is way up there! You’d also be asking readers to calculate an exponential curve in their head to see if two countries are on the same trajectory ???"


ES1d2TGWkAA2Lam
The exponential argument is mathematically nonsense and the idea that it would be too hard to read is saying I want people to read the graph the way I want them to.

The graph is done and luckily largely ignored by experts.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
The exponential argument is mathematically nonsense and the idea that it would be too hard to read is saying I want people to read the graph the way I want them to.

Hahah the irony of this.

You are just reading the graph the way you want to. You're upset it doesn't back up your previous opinions.

You keep banging on about the scale but that does not mean the data is incorrect. We have more deaths at this stage (6 days after the 10th death) than Italy dead. You cannot dispute that regardless of how much you dislike the scale.
 

NortonSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
They were mate, the uk government wrote to the eu about it. It's a fact mate sorry but you've fucked this one up.
David, old chap, stand down. Flights are not happening because of potential loss of slots. Under normal flying circumstances yes I would agree but these are not normal circumstances. I am actually isolated in Riyadh until this virus thing is over and means that flights can resume.
You really shouldn't respond unless you know something more than the U.K. government sent a letter to the EU. You come off looking like the village idiot and we all know that is not the case.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Vaccine in six months 'improbable'

Prof Whitty tries to dampen hopes that a vaccine can be developed quickly to combat COVID-19.

"However much we would like there to be a vaccine riding to the rescue in six months time, currently - we think that's improbable," he says, frankly.

Improbable but not impossible, lets keep our fingers crossed
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top