Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (33 Viewers)

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Well everyone else is 1M/1.5M so it makes no sense to be 2
Australia have no social distancing in their schools at all. But then they’ve only had 102 deaths in this entire outbreak.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Errrrr it’s common sense to think that 1m instead of 2 will have less of an impact on people’s lives and they economy, are you stupid?

Me stupid? You've just shown your inability to read basic English.

As you have the reading comprehension of a primary school child let me break this down into crayon for you:

No one knows what the safe distance for this novel coronavirus as no gold standard trials have taken place.

You understand what that means?

So you have to decide on if you are going to prioritise the economy or the safety of people and potentially save lives

Got that Dom?
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
Me stupid? You've just shown your inability to read basic English.

As you have the reading comprehension of a primary school child let me break this down into crayon for you:

No one knows what the safe distance for this novel coronavirus as no gold standard trials have taken place.

You understand what that means?

So you have to decide on if you are going to prioritise the economy or the safety of people and potentially save lives

Got that Dom?
No you can safe lives and get the economy going together safely, 1M is safe according to many other countries
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
tenor.gif

Confirmed. Roof terrace to be open
See you up there
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
What?

Are you stupid?

That is not what my post was about.

Can you even read? Forgive me but did you finish school?

So you have to decide on if you are going to prioritise the economy or the safety of people and potentially save lives

Wtf are you chattin? That’s what you said
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
If he hadn't absolutely fucked the initial response we would likely be almost fully reopen by now.
Exactly this. Look at the countries that took it serious in the first place and took advantage of the advanced notice we were getting from the initial hot spots.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
No you can safe lives and get the economy going together safely, 1M is safe according to many other countries

Yes and many countries (ie just about every country) haven't had it as bad as us, nor do they continue to have it as bad as we are currently.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
So you have to decide on if you are going to prioritise the economy or the safety of people and potentially save lives

Wtf are you chattin? That’s what you said

Yes but that is not the same as saying you can't reopen the economy safely.

I apologise, I didn't realise you had learning disabilities.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
For everyone else who isn't a moron.

Countries have adopted distances over 1m as the only real research we have into droplet spread is based on influenza and the research for that shows a higher risk of infection at 1.8m or less.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Why is why we need to errr reopen? Some people on here can’t seem to figure that one out in their small brains
That is why we need to accept the reality and not think that we can wish this all away by opening things up. Opening things up in reality is pointless if enough of the population doesn’t have the confidence to use those facilities and that confidence has to come from a measured response to every aspect of this from the government and they’ve fucked it up at every level, failed to take control of the disease and no body trusts them. What’s the point in the pubs opening if every night is like a quite wet Tuesday night when there’s something worth watching on the telly? These businesses need to be sustainable when they open up again and that is only going to happen when there’s public confidence to return to them and that’s only going to happen when the government get everything else right. If you think ending lockdown is going to be some sort of golden ticket for the economy you’re setting yourself up for a fall again.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
That is why we need to accept the reality and not think that we can wish this all away by opening things up. Opening things up in reality is pointless if enough of the population doesn’t have the confidence to use those facilities and that confidence has to come from a measured response to every aspect of this from the government and they’ve fucked it up at every level, failed to take control of the disease and no body trusts them. What’s the point in the pubs opening if every night is like a quite wet Tuesday night when there’s something worth watching on the telly? These businesses need to be sustainable when they open up again and that is only going to happen when there’s public confidence to return to them and that’s only going to happen when the government get everything else right. If you think ending lockdown is going to be some sort of golden ticket for the economy you’re setting yourself up for a fall again.

Thus the outside of day 1 retail figures
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
upload_2020-6-19_13-47-8.png

As a little extra to myself over this difficult period, I bought a little dual sports bike. Decals arrived today.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
How is that?!?! Ridiculous statement he’s the one getting things reopen

Because if he'd done his job half competently we'd be far further along the curve, infections and deaths would be much lower with less chance of infections being brought in from overseas and we could look to be opening, or even be open already.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top