Ian1779
Well-Known Member
Australia have no social distancing in their schools at all. But then they’ve only had 102 deaths in this entire outbreak.Well everyone else is 1M/1.5M so it makes no sense to be 2
Australia have no social distancing in their schools at all. But then they’ve only had 102 deaths in this entire outbreak.Well everyone else is 1M/1.5M so it makes no sense to be 2
How is that?!?! Ridiculous statement he’s the one getting things reopen
Yeah I want it to be safe obviously but it needs to be sped upSurely every vaccine should be safe before being used. Would you prefer one that is not known to be safe?
How is that?!?! Ridiculous statement he’s the one getting things reopen
Errrrr it’s common sense to think that 1m instead of 2 will have less of an impact on people’s lives and they economy, are you stupid?
The economy is already dead.WHO recommends 1M, why are you lot so for having the 2M rule, it will kill the economy if it’s that much any longer....do you not think about how many people will lose their jobs and livelihoods?
Yeah I want it to be safe obviously but it needs to be sped up
Stating the bleeding obvious here!You are stupid.
It’s slowed down, look at the numbers over the last few weeks.It is rapidly declining, look at the numbers over the last few months
Why is why we need to errr reopen? Some people on here can’t seem to figure that one out in their small brainsThe economy is already dead.
Stating the bleeding obvious here!
Errrrr it’s common sense to think that 1m instead of 2 will have less of an impact on people’s lives and they economy, are you stupid?
Wot?Why is why we need to errr reopen?
At times?!?I shouldn't post comments like that but he's such a fucking idiot at times
No you can safe lives and get the economy going together safely, 1M is safe according to many other countriesMe stupid? You've just shown your inability to read basic English.
As you have the reading comprehension of a primary school child let me break this down into crayon for you:
No one knows what the safe distance for this novel coronavirus as no gold standard trials have taken place.
You understand what that means?
So you have to decide on if you are going to prioritise the economy or the safety of people and potentially save lives
Got that Dom?
No you can safe lives and get the economy going together safely
No you can safe lives and get the economy going together safely, 1M is safe according to many other countries
Define impact? Are you talking death of friends and family or not going to the pub?Errrrr it’s common sense to think that 1m instead of 2 will have less of an impact on people’s lives and they economy, are you stupid?
He'd have to start it first.Forgive me but did you finish school?
What?
Are you stupid?
That is not what my post was about.
Can you even read? Forgive me but did you finish school?
So you have to decide on if you are going to prioritise the economy or the safety of people and potentially save lives
Wtf are you chattin? That’s what you said
Advice for publicYou said 1m was WHO guideline.
Can you link this please?
Exactly this. Look at the countries that took it serious in the first place and took advantage of the advanced notice we were getting from the initial hot spots.If he hadn't absolutely fucked the initial response we would likely be almost fully reopen by now.
No you can safe lives and get the economy going together safely, 1M is safe according to many other countries
So you have to decide on if you are going to prioritise the economy or the safety of people and potentially save lives
Wtf are you chattin? That’s what you said
That is why we need to accept the reality and not think that we can wish this all away by opening things up. Opening things up in reality is pointless if enough of the population doesn’t have the confidence to use those facilities and that confidence has to come from a measured response to every aspect of this from the government and they’ve fucked it up at every level, failed to take control of the disease and no body trusts them. What’s the point in the pubs opening if every night is like a quite wet Tuesday night when there’s something worth watching on the telly? These businesses need to be sustainable when they open up again and that is only going to happen when there’s public confidence to return to them and that’s only going to happen when the government get everything else right. If you think ending lockdown is going to be some sort of golden ticket for the economy you’re setting yourself up for a fall again.Why is why we need to errr reopen? Some people on here can’t seem to figure that one out in their small brains
That is why we need to accept the reality and not think that we can wish this all away by opening things up. Opening things up in reality is pointless if enough of the population doesn’t have the confidence to use those facilities and that confidence has to come from a measured response to every aspect of this from the government and they’ve fucked it up at every level, failed to take control of the disease and no body trusts them. What’s the point in the pubs opening if every night is like a quite wet Tuesday night when there’s something worth watching on the telly? These businesses need to be sustainable when they open up again and that is only going to happen when there’s public confidence to return to them and that’s only going to happen when the government get everything else right. If you think ending lockdown is going to be some sort of golden ticket for the economy you’re setting yourself up for a fall again.
Despite the big queues helped in part by decent weather the footfalls are well down on the same period last year.Thus the outside of day 1 retail figures
It is rapidly declining, look at the numbers over the last few months
How is that?!?! Ridiculous statement he’s the one getting things reopen