Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (154 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
yes but they aren't the highest priority

You are doing this again, acting like everything slightly positive is the greatest thing ever instead of being sensible and just being happy things are moving in the right direction.

Any setbacks and you'll be acting like it's the end of the world.

Relax and accept as per the government and expert advice it's likely to be Easter before things start to get back to normal.
The care home thing is just because they will have to visit the homes to administer the vaccine and that will cause issues with wastage. Doesn't mean they're going to not use the millions of doses ordered, they'll just move down the priority list to those who can attend vaccination centres.

If you look at the implementation plan its very aggressive in moving through the groups, there's not going to be weeks in one group before moving onto another.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
yes but they aren't the highest priority

You are doing this again, acting like everything slightly positive is the greatest thing ever instead of being sensible and just being happy things are moving in the right direction.

Any setbacks and you'll be acting like it's the end of the world.

Relax and accept as per the government and expert advice it's likely to be Easter before things start to get back to normal.

If they're taking care of the patients having them ill and therefore understaffed is more dangerous.

So I'd say having the people with the expertise and ability to care for others not ill and in less danger is a priority.

Of course if it is such that it may not stop you being infectious that needs to be taken into account when dealing with those in the vulnerable categories but allied with rigorous testing it makes sense.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
The care home thing is just because they will have to visit the homes to administer the vaccine and that will cause issues with wastage. Doesn't mean they're going to not use the millions of doses ordered, they'll just move down the priority list to those who can attend vaccination centres.

If you look at the implementation plan its very aggressive in moving through the groups, there's not going to be weeks in one group before moving onto another.

I simply said currently they can't give the vaccine to who needs it most, were did I say anything different?
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
If they're taking care of the patients having them ill and therefore understaffed is more dangerous.

So I'd say having the people with the expertise and ability to care for others not ill and in less danger is a priority.

Of course if it is such that it may not stop you being infectious that needs to be taken into account when dealing with those in the vulnerable categories but allied with rigorous testing it makes sense.

Care home residents are the accepted highest priority as they are most likely to die. If you think they should be deemed the cat 1 priority you need to have a word with government.
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
No, I'd say the people most at risk of dying should be the highest priority and they are. The government agrees.

The vast majority of people who have had the virus do not work in the NHS. The majority of people I know who tested positive work in education.
Calm down dear. No one said the vast majority work in the NHS. Let's not argue about the many variables.

Old folks homes and NHS most critical.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Calm down dear. No one said the vast majority work in the NHS. Let's not argue about the many variables.

Old folks homes and NHS most critical.

You said that the only people you knew who had covid worked in the NHS, I was simply pointing out this had no baring on anything.

So calm down dear
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
You said that the only people you knew who had covid worked in the NHS, I was simply pointing out this had no baring on anything.

So calm down dear
I know we're not Western Australia, but isn't it interesting that 25% of all incidents of the virus in the whole of WA are in health services.

No bearing on anything of course.
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
yes but they aren't the highest priority

You are doing this again, acting like everything slightly positive is the greatest thing ever instead of being sensible and just being happy things are moving in the right direction.

Any setbacks and you'll be acting like it's the end of the world.

Relax and accept as per the government and expert advice it's likely to be Easter before things start to get back to normal.


The whole situation is really affecting people's mental health. I think he's allowed to take any small positive as the greatest thing ever if it helps him to deal with the situation.

@SkyBlueDom26 you keep being positive bud. We're all with you and hope that things continue getting better.
 

SkyBlueDom26

Well-Known Member
The whole situation is really affecting people's mental health. I think he's allowed to take any small positive as the greatest thing ever if it helps him to deal with the situation.

@SkyBlueDom26 you keep being positive bud. We're all with you and hope that things continue getting better.
Even if its just the NHS staff getting the jab its a good start ain't it, then I'm hopeful the other vaccines will get approval in the next few weeks
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
I know we're not Western Australia, but isn't it interesting that 25% of all incidents of the virus in the whole of WA are in health services.

No bearing on anything of course.

You're right it doesn't have any bearing on anything. If you could show that in the UK then maybe you'd be on to something.

The reason care home residents and staff are in cat 1 and nhs staff cat 2 is because the biggest danger is if any winter outbreak gets into care homes again you will see deaths increase massively again.

These aren't my categories they are the governments.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
The whole situation is really affecting people's mental health. I think he's allowed to take any small positive as the greatest thing ever if it helps him to deal with the situation.

@SkyBlueDom26 you keep being positive bud. We're all with you and hope that things continue getting better.

I was making the point that he needs to not get into the situation where he was before where he acted bipolar towards the news. Massive highs and crashing lows.


I know you've had a hard time so I'm going to leave this here.
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
one thing i don't understand is, what has alcohol got anything to do with the virus ??? for example in Wales pubs, restaurants etc have got a curfew by 6pm i understand that, but there not permitted to sell alcohol. why not ??

maybe im missing something or the point but i dont understand why we can drink alcohol
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
one thing i don't understand is, what has alcohol got anything to do with the virus ??? for example in Wales pubs, restaurants etc have got a curfew by 6pm i understand that, but there not permitted to sell alcohol. why not ??

maybe im missing something or the point but i dont understand why we can drink alcohol

People less likely to follow social distancing when pissed basically.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
one thing i don't understand is, what has alcohol got anything to do with the virus ??? for example in Wales pubs, restaurants etc have got a curfew by 6pm i understand that, but there not permitted to sell alcohol. why not ??

maybe im missing something or the point but i dont understand why we can drink alcohol

It's more than drunk people are less likely to follow rules so the banning of selling alcohol makes more sense than closing at 10pm but still being able to sell as much booze as possible before that.
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
People less likely to follow social distancing when pissed basically.

should of known that really but surly that's up to the person drinking its not the pubs fault some folk cant handle their drink in a sense. ruining business left right and centre
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
It's more than drunk people are less likely to follow rules so the banning of selling alcohol makes more sense than closing at 10pm but still being able to sell as much booze as possible before that.


but even so its an outright ban on alcohol witch isn't right in my opinion, wheres the free will people making up their own minds.

just a view of myself like
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
should of known that really but surly that's up to the person drinking its not the pubs fault some folk cant handle their drink in a sense. ruining business left right and centre

Lack of government support is ruining businesses, I’d agree. You can’t tell people to shut or limit their business for public health reasons and not compensate them appropriately.

That said, I think you’d be hard pushed to find a pub that stops serving people when they’re tipsy.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
but even so its an outright ban on alcohol witch isn't right in my opinion, wheres the free will people making up their own minds.

just a view of myself like

We live in a society with laws. This is basic social contract stuff. Same as gun laws. Same as drug laws. Same as driving laws. Also when dealing with populations millions of small decisions add up to one large one.

The concept of “personal responsibility” kind of falls apart during a pandemic. We act as a group or we don’t act at all.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
To follow on from what I posted earlier about my concerns that people are being left to use common sense over Christmas just seen that once we're out of lockdown Primark, and other stores, will be opening 24/7. Why do we swing from one extreme to another? Surely the choice isn't close stores or keep them open 24 hours a day.
On the other hand it avoids the compression of everybody piling in in a shorter time window and the associated problems with public transport etc
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
but even so its an outright ban on alcohol witch isn't right in my opinion, wheres the free will people making up their own minds.

just a view of myself like

We don't have outright free will, laws govern society and anyway there are already licensing laws that regulate and restrict the sale of alcohol.

Also it's not an outright ban on alcohol as it is still available else where and it's a compromise to allow the hospitality industry to still try and stay open.
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
We don't have outright free will, laws govern society and anyway there are already licensing laws that regulate and restrict the sale of alcohol.

Also it's not an outright ban on alcohol as it is still available else where and it's a compromise to allow the hospitality industry to still try and stay open.


in pubs and restaurants it is an outright ban,
"in Pubs and restaurants across Wales will be banned from selling alcohol and be forced to close at 6pm every evening".
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
in pubs and restaurants it is an outright ban,
"in Pubs and restaurants across Wales will be banned from selling alcohol and be forced to close at 6pm every evening".

Not in society though it isn't. Cool should they just close them completely?
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
Not in society though it isn't. Cool should they just close them completely?


no of course not, the complete opposite, they should be allowing us all to get hammered after a three course meal, might actually help a little bit after the shite year everyone has had being its the run upto Christmas like.

even if its just a glass of red after a nice bit of medium rare wouldn't go a miss would it that's not to bad or a lot to ask really
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
no of course not, the complete opposite, they should be allowing us all to get hammered after a three course meal, might actually help a little bit after the shite year everyone has had being its the run upto Christmas like.

even if its just a glass of red after a nice bit of medium rare wouldn't go a miss would it that's not to bad or a lot to ask really

so more people die? fuck that mate
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
so more people die? fuck that mate


1st part was a joke but what is the harm in having a pint or a glass of wine after food instead of none at all. All it needs is say two alcoholic drinks with ur meal instead of nothing. Boost there incomings abit even if it's marginally
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
On the face of it numbers still going in the right direction. Number of tests down which might just be the effect of less people having symptoms and applying for a Pillar 2 test.

1606756214320.png
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top