If you remember I felt at the time there was a reason the figure of 70% was being emphasised over the apparent 90% success of the subset trial .Why do you keep saying downplayed? The latest claims about the AZ trials (if you take them seriously) would surely argue the opposite?
But didn't know the reason which was perplexing to me.
Now it's been clarified that the subset had an age ceiling ,which isn't a full trial when compared with the double full dose excercise .
So it's now clarified for me the reasoning behind the promotion of the 70% figure .
No drama.