The EU: In, out, shake it all about.... (138 Viewers)

As of right now, how are thinking of voting? In or out

  • Remain

    Votes: 23 37.1%
  • Leave

    Votes: 35 56.5%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • Not registered or not intention to vote

    Votes: 1 1.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
The EU is at crossroads now that Brexit is actually going ahead and a reality for both the EU and the UK.

Frankly, if Brexit is a success, there are countries that are willing to have their own polls on EU membership. Italy seem to the most likely, but France also has a lot of Eurosceptics too.

Personally, I do believe remaining in the EU was the ‘best deal’ to start with, despite the UK always being a reluctant member of the European project. However, I’m weirdly optimistic about Brexit and genuinely hope it goes well. Hopefully we get some good FTAs to compliment the new UK-EU deal too.

On the issue of Scottish independence, Brexit makes it politically more popular. Yet, ironically, politically impractical to be delivered.
 

BackRoomRummermill

Well-Known Member
Nicola Sturgeon is the only devolved leader who repeatedly states that I don’t want to bring political agend into this , all the time says it ....

no one else does in the whole of the UK ....

make of that what you will. Living in Scotland bot by bit is becoming an experiment for the SNP , i expect RT news to base themselves in Edinburgh, along with Sputnik TV ....
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
The EU is at crossroads now that Brexit is actually going ahead and a reality for both the EU and the UK.

Frankly, if Brexit is a success, there are countries that are willing to have their own polls on EU membership. Italy seem to the most likely, but France also has a lot of Eurosceptics too.

Personally, I do believe remaining in the EU was the ‘best deal’ to start with, despite the UK always being a reluctant member of the European project. However, I’m weirdly optimistic about Brexit and genuinely hope it goes well. Hopefully we get some good FTAs to compliment the new UK-EU deal too.

On the issue of Scottish independence, Brexit makes it politically more popular. Yet, ironically, politically impractical to be delivered.

Michael Gove said now they can level up the UK.
The inference of course is that they couldn't do it in the EU. I suspect that's absolute bollocks but either way he's said it now, they have to own it, if they do it great, if not, let's hope the cap doffers hold them to account for once.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
From what I’ve read it seems that the deal keeps the UK and EU very closely aligned in terms of regulations, which was always going to be inevitable, I guess.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
From what I’ve read it seems that the deal keeps the UK and EU very closely aligned in terms of regulations, which was always going to be inevitable, I guess.
Media here reporting it as close alignment but no longer shackled by Brussels bureaucracy and authoritarianism :) seems ironic due to the paperwork about to be created in order to trade.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
50 50 compromise is generally reported
According to who? Not the fishing industry.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Michael Gove said now they can level up the UK.
The inference of course is that they couldn't do it in the EU. I suspect that's absolute bollocks but either way he's said it now, they have to own it, if they do it great, if not, let's hope the cap doffers hold them to account for once.

Agreed.

If Brexit goes well, the Tories probably secure another generation in power. Badly, their economic credibility goes out the window for a generation too.

Apparently there is some 50 FTAs in the pipelines, and maybe this can help boost the economy.

But, the risk of cause goes that new scapegoats arising in the kinds of areas that voted Brexit in the first place. Trump picked up votes in areas that cited job things like NAFTA as the reason for job losses in areas like Michigan, Wisconsin, Penn and so on.

Hopefully a new independent trade policy gives us more prosperity.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Agreed.

If Brexit goes well, the Tories probably secure another generation in power. Badly, their economic credibility goes out the window for a generation too.

Apparently there is some 50 FTAs in the pipelines, and maybe this can help boost the economy.

But, the risk of cause goes that new scapegoats arising in the kinds of areas that voted Brexit in the first place. Trump picked up votes in areas that cited job things like NAFTA as the reason for job losses in areas like Michigan, Wisconsin, Penn and so on.

Hopefully a new independent trade policy gives us more prosperity.

There’ll be no objective dispassionate assessment of Brexit. We’ve seen that already. Everything is written off as one offs, or shifty foreigners not giving us our due, or going to happen any way.

Whatever happens next half the country will say it was because of Brexit and half won’t, all that’ll change is which half says which.

The fact is we’re talking basic laws of trade here, not some great unknown. We know putting up trade barriers will result in less trade just like we know any other scientific facts. We’re just obliged out of politeness to pretend we don’t know this so we don’t hurt people’s feelings.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
There’ll be no objective dispassionate assessment of Brexit. We’ve seen that already. Everything is written off as one offs, or shifty foreigners not giving us our due, or going to happen any way.

Whatever happens next half the country will say it was because of Brexit and half won’t, all that’ll change is which half says which.

The fact is we’re talking basic laws of trade here, not some great unknown. We know putting up trade barriers will result in less trade just like we know any other scientific facts. We’re just obliged out of politeness to pretend we don’t know this so we don’t hurt people’s feelings.

in the end unless people’s lives are actually impacted no one will care and it will just be a footnote in history
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
There’ll be no objective dispassionate assessment of Brexit. We’ve seen that already. Everything is written off as one offs, or shifty foreigners not giving us our due, or going to happen any way.

Whatever happens next half the country will say it was because of Brexit and half won’t, all that’ll change is which half says which.

The fact is we’re talking basic laws of trade here, not some great unknown. We know putting up trade barriers will result in less trade just like we know any other scientific facts. We’re just obliged out of politeness to pretend we don’t know this so we don’t hurt people’s feelings.
Comes down to whether Brexit will judged solely on trade.
How will they judge the immigration part - can't just be on numbers? Quantity vs quality? Cost to the economy?
How do they tangibly measure the "success or failure" of sovereignty?
Does it ultimately cause Scotland to leave the Union?
What major non-trade related decisions do they want to make that they couldn't under the EU?
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
There’ll be no objective dispassionate assessment of Brexit. We’ve seen that already. Everything is written off as one offs, or shifty foreigners not giving us our due, or going to happen any way.

Whatever happens next half the country will say it was because of Brexit and half won’t, all that’ll change is which half says which.

The fact is we’re talking basic laws of trade here, not some great unknown. We know putting up trade barriers will result in less trade just like we know any other scientific facts. We’re just obliged out of politeness to pretend we don’t know this so we don’t hurt people’s feelings.

From my line of work, both the EU and UK are bringing in simplifications to their import and export processes to mitigate the risks of increased paperwork whilst facilitating trade.

It's not as ideal as complete free trade within the EU, but the argument the Brexiteers are making is the UK can do business globally and have FTAs with more countries than the EU.

The onus is on the Government to deliver on this 'outward looking', Post-Brexit 'global Britain' and in fairness, the FTAs we're negotiating will be purely with our national interests in mind as opposed to the EU and their member state's interests - which can be competing at times.

Ultimately, I'm open minded to see how Brexit goes, and if it goes badly, there's always the option to vote for a party who'll apply to rejoin the EU in their manifesto. I'm sure this will be Lib Dems raison d'être as a political entity for next generation.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Comes down to whether Brexit will judged solely on trade.
How will they judge the immigration part - can't just be on numbers? Quantity vs quality? Cost to the economy?
How do they tangibly measure the "success or failure" of sovereignty?
Does it ultimately cause Scotland to leave the Union?
What major non-trade related decisions do they want to make that they couldn't under the EU?

Brexit has nothing to do with Scotland and the union. It’s the latest excuse from the chancer Sturgeon
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Comes down to whether Brexit will judged solely on trade.
How will they judge the immigration part - can't just be on numbers? Quantity vs quality? Cost to the economy?
How do they tangibly measure the "success or failure" of sovereignty?
Does it ultimately cause Scotland to leave the Union?
What major non-trade related decisions do they want to make that they couldn't under the EU?
Northern Ireland will go first and looking at the withdrawal agreement the Tories want it also. Anyway, breaking up the Union was project fear.
 

tisza

Well-Known Member
Brexit has nothing to do with Scotland and the union. It’s the latest excuse from the chancer Sturgeon
For sure Sturgeon will use it but Scotland was heavily Remain and polls indicate that Brexit could be a factor in how people could vote in a new Leave referendum. Again it comes down to how much concrete information on the consequences of a Leave vote voters would have - EU membership, hard borders, rest of UK trade. (Currently Scotland trade with UK 3 times bigger than EU trade).
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
For sure Sturgeon will use it but Scotland was heavily Remain and polls indicate that Brexit could be a factor in how people could vote in a new Leave referendum. Again it comes down to how much concrete information on the consequences of a Leave vote voters would have - EU membership, hard borders, rest of UK trade. (Currently Scotland trade with UK 3 times bigger than EU trade).

She already was demanding another referendum even if their was a second referendum on Brexit and it was then decided to remain
 
D

Deleted member 4439

Guest
Whatever happens next half the country will say it was because of Brexit and half won’t, all that’ll change is which half says which.

The truth. Just like Thatcherism. Both sides are sincere and ultimate in their beliefs.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
well then there’s no point being in an expensive members club if there’s no negative impact is there.
Erm,if there's noaffect either way, you just leave it as it is!

You're claiming there *is* an affect so if you're right... that affect will be noticed now, as we now live in the land of milk and honey, where there's spare pots of cash galore for all manner of things.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator

That loss is especially painful for Britain, which ran a surplus of £18 billion, or $24 billion, on trade in financial and other services with the European Union in 2019, but a deficit of £97 billion, or $129 billion, on trade in goods.

“The result of the deal is that the European Union retains all of its current advantages in trading, particularly with goods, and the U.K. loses all of its current advantages in the trade for services,” said Tom Kibasi, the former director of the Institute for Public Policy Research, a research institute. “The outcome of this trade negotiation is precisely what happens with most trade deals: The larger party gets what it wants and the smaller party rolls over.”
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Fishing industry definitely not happy


Boris sold out seems to be the general perception in the industry.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

That loss is especially painful for Britain, which ran a surplus of £18 billion, or $24 billion, on trade in financial and other services with the European Union in 2019, but a deficit of £97 billion, or $129 billion, on trade in goods.

“The result of the deal is that the European Union retains all of its current advantages in trading, particularly with goods, and the U.K. loses all of its current advantages in the trade for services,” said Tom Kibasi, the former director of the Institute for Public Policy Research, a research institute. “The outcome of this trade negotiation is precisely what happens with most trade deals: The larger party gets what it wants and the smaller party rolls over.”

Nice try - hardly a qualified view

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top