Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (119 Viewers)

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
We agreed to pay for the doses we'd ordered months before they even knew it worked let alone got approval to ensure they would be able to get mass production up and running so we're definitely at the front of the queue.


Yeah, I thought we’d be front of the queue but didn’t know to what extent. For example would AZ need to produce all of our 100m doses before anyone else gets any ? pretty sure I’d also heard/read AZ will set your manufacturing hubs in Europe so maybe UK manufacturing is just for us. Without wanting to sound selfish, I hope so. But not heard what the aim is for the maximum production is here ie is 2m per week the capacity ?
 

SBT

Well-Known Member

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

This stands out to me:

'He also said Ireland, as well as Britain, have paid the price for being among the few places in the world without tight controls on airports and ports. Both have announced tougher restrictions in recent days, with air passengers being required to show a negative test taken up to 72 hours before departure.
Scally said, too, that Ireland hasn’t taken advantage of its island status the way places such as New Zealand and Taiwan have.'
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
This stands out to me:

'He also said Ireland, as well as Britain, have paid the price for being among the few places in the world without tight controls on airports and ports. Both have announced tougher restrictions in recent days, with air passengers being required to show a negative test taken up to 72 hours before departure.
Scally said, too, that Ireland hasn’t taken advantage of its island status the way places such as New Zealand and Taiwan have.'

I can’t be bothered to discuss island status but a comparison to Taiwan is ridiculous
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
This stands out to me:

'He also said Ireland, as well as Britain, have paid the price for being among the few places in the world without tight controls on airports and ports. Both have announced tougher restrictions in recent days, with air passengers being required to show a negative test taken up to 72 hours before departure.
Scally said, too, that Ireland hasn’t taken advantage of its island status the way places such as New Zealand and Taiwan have.'
Ireland have had a quarantine order on people coming from the UK, seems obvious that people have gone home for Christmas, particularly from London and spread it around
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Fail to see how and besides the quote came from an article you’re trying to use to criticise the Irish approach

Population density
Requirements for airports to stay operational - we are a hub for cross global travel - I doubt we’d legally have even been allowed to take such actions and divert fkoghts
Far greater necessity for shipments through ports

I bet the Isle of Man is ok as well - it’s an island as is the Scilly Isles
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
Population density
Requirements for airports to stay operational - we are a hub for cross global travel - I doubt we’d legally have even been allowed to take such actions and divert fkoghts
Far greater necessity for shipments through ports

I bet the Isle of Man is ok as well - it’s an island as is the Scilly Isles
Just the kind of twaddle I would expect frome someone who says he doesn't understand what the term covid cases means.

So all countries can demand clear covid tests where the test was taken within the last 72 hours but it wouldn’t be legal for the UK to do so?

Yes we are an international hub. People travelling elsewhere are not the problem. Most of them already need a clear test and do not come away from the airports. Those travelling to the UK don't presently need a test so bring it into the UK.

Just one more occasion the Tories have got it badly wrong.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
What confuses me a great deal is how catching and overcoming the actual virus confers seemingly less immunity than vaccines using attenuated mutant viruses or RNA vectors.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
What confuses me a great deal is how catching and overcoming the actual virus confers seemingly less immunity than vaccines using attenuated mutant viruses or RNA vectors.
I guess we don't know how long immunity because of the vaccines will last, yet?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
No, but the latest estimates seem to be about 5 months after recovering from COVID. Doesn’t seem long at all but tells me those booster jabs for the vaccines are essential
The report says at least five months, and that's the current length of the study. It might go up a lot for most people
 

We'll_live_and_die

Super Moderator
What confuses me a great deal is how catching and overcoming the actual virus confers seemingly less immunity than vaccines using attenuated mutant viruses or RNA vectors.
I read something this morning that said recovering from the virus would give better protection to re-infection than the vaccine.

The study I read about watched something like 6500 people with only 44 catching it again. I think it said they were medical staff, so likely to become re-infected if it was possible.

*EDIT* It was on the DM but is a PHE study.

 
Last edited:

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Population density
Requirements for airports to stay operational - we are a hub for cross global travel - I doubt we’d legally have even been allowed to take such actions and divert fkoghts
Far greater necessity for shipments through ports

I bet the Isle of Man is ok as well - it’s an island as is the Scilly Isles
Taiwan population density is over twice that of the U.K.. What requirement of airports? Who says anyone using it as a hub has to leave the airport complex? I’ve been to Dubai 4 times and am yet to leave the airport complex.
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
Taiwan population density is over twice that of the U.K.. What requirement of airports? Who says anyone using it as a hub has to leave the airport complex? I’ve been to Dubai 4 times and am yet to leave the airport complex.
Thoroughly nice airport so I can understand.

The last time I was there I saw Michelle Keegan who was on her hen do with all her mates. :love: The embarrassing was I hadn't even clocked them and it took my Missus to point them out.

Completely unrelated to the topic but hey ho.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I read something this morning that said recovering from the virus would give better protection to re-infection than the vaccine.

The study I read about watched something like 6500 people with only 44 catching it again. I think it said they were medical staff, so likely to become re-infected if it was possible.

*EDIT* It was on the DM but is a PHE study.

That’s good
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Was curious so did a quick google for data on population density and how it relates to covid rates. Found this which would suggest the link isn't as great as you would think.

Screenshot 2021-01-14 at 10.11.59.png

 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I read something this morning that said recovering from the virus would give better protection to re-infection than the vaccine.

The study I read about watched something like 6500 people with only 44 catching it again. I think it said they were medical staff, so likely to become re-infected if it was possible.

*EDIT* It was on the DM but is a PHE study.


That's positive - was everybody subject to the same control though, i.e. exposed to a similar level risk of reinfection?
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Was curious so did a quick google for data on population density and how it relates to covid rates. Found this which would suggest the link isn't as great as you would think.

View attachment 18245


The problem with population density on a country wide level is that it ignores the spread of people within that country, e.g. Canada is low population density but in any case, most of its population actually live in big city urban areas.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
That's positive - was everybody subject to the same control though, i.e. exposed to a similar level risk of reinfection?

the study says 5 months immunity for most and if it was a vaccine it would be 83% effective
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The problem with population density on a country wide level is that it ignores the spread of people within that country, e.g. Canada is low population density but in any case, most of its population actually live in big city urban areas.

Well yes I thought that would be obvious

Brazil and actually the US are some of the least densely populated countries in the world but in reality they really are not
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Good news that 20m doses of the vaccine are in UK, a lot still needs to be batch tested and put in vials but good to know that the key component is available !

Keep your chins up all...the numbers won’t be pretty in the coming days but there is light at the end of the tunnel
 

jordan210

Well-Known Member
Good news that 20m doses of the vaccine are in UK, a lot still needs to be batch tested and put in vials but good to know that the key component is available !

Keep your chins up all...the numbers won’t be pretty in the coming days but there is light at the end of the tunnel


A small glimmer of light is always nice. Hopefully we have a way to speed up batch testing and packaging.

The figures will in theory go up for deaths as the positives start to tail off. But remember the death figure the news uses does still include back dating.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top