skybluesam66
Well-Known Member
It’s like buying land without planning permission
However if you get permission first the value will be much higher
Derby unable to pay players wages (14 Viewers)
- Thread starter jordan210
- Start date
However if you get permission first the value will be much higher
better days
Well-Known Member
The plans for the new ground at the University would address this for a serious investor
Brighton I suppose are the template
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Fully agree with you but I’m not convinced yet that the ground plans are serious.
AOM
Well-Known Member
Although could a potential new owner use the land Sisu may have agreed with the university to build a ground there themselves?
Would take a buyer willing to make a massive investment though...
Adge
Well-Known Member
In this situation it but us on the Arse.
mark82
Super Moderator
I'm not sure it did. He was kept on as an emergency option on a very low wage for the level. Had we had to bring someone else in it would have cost significantly more which may have meant we had to compromise more elsewhere.
Frostie
Well-Known Member
How so? It wasn't an obligation, it was an option in our favour, we chose to take it up.
As Mark said, obviously felt we couldn't get better for the money involved & Baka still had untapped potential.
cc84cov
Well-Known Member
Untapped potential
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
As a binman perhaps
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Equally, in Robins' mind he probably wasn't forecasting for the loss of both Godden and Walker long term.
In theory Baka, nor Biamou were meant to play much of a part this season so dedicating time and resources to bring in a 3rd choice striker was futile, as it would quite clearly be a hard sell bringing in an adequate striker who's happy to play third fiddle.
Realistically it's far easier just to take the calculated risk of extending Baka's contract for another year to ensure that there's at least some cover behind Godden and Walker, and just hope it wouldn't get to the stage where he'd have to be called upon on a consistent basis.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
That's the long and the short of it isn't it?
Would people rather we signed one less other player to bring in someone who still wouldn't be in the team? It's just bad luck we've lost both our strikers for most of the season.
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
Exactly. I think as fans we fail to realise the amount of calculated risks that football managers and backroom staff are forced to take in the transfer window, whether that be in regards to bringing in players or retaining them - especially those who manage clubs with a similar budget size to ours.
There's only a finite amount of time in a single window therefore in order to be as efficient as possible within said window it's obvious that in some positions Robins may be forced to settle for what he has, as there just isn't the time or resources to address every single position - certainly not on our budget or staff size anyway.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
It's just a complete piss take isn't it?
mark82
Super Moderator
mark82
Super Moderator
Liquid Gold
Well-Known Member
He's not going to have come cheap. I bet they paid a bigger loan fee for him than we have for any transfers this year. Did their takeover go through or something?
Frostie
Well-Known Member
Yup, I know they've let a couple go too but surely questions need to be asked.
mark82
Super Moderator
Nope. Not yet
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Same with all these shit housers, the white knight must have confirmed the sale
mark82
Super Moderator
5 loans. Lee Gregory (Stoke), Patrick Roberts (Man City), Teden Mengi (Man Utd), George Edmondson (Rangers), Beni Baningime (Everton).
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
Frostie
Well-Known Member
Already have Matt Clarke on loan too. Someone's going to miss out.
Brighton Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
How does that work then
Can’t pay wages but then go out and sign 5 players next month
Rooney could probably drop half his salary to cover them