Probably a minority view, but I hate it. Makes overtaking so artificial, takes the skill out of it to a certain extent, too. I know we'd got to a stage where overtaking was proper challenging, but a driver's skill is also in keeping a faster car behind them, not having them breeze by on a straight.
I wouldn't say it's a minority view at all, certainly not amongst fans. In an ideal world they'll get the cars able to follow better without the need for it from next year.
Problem is people became obsessed with the idea that great races had to involve lots of overtaking. So F1 reacted. But, there are plenty of examples in history of great races that didn't necessarily have a lot of overtaking, yet still proved a lot of tension. You can go back to 2005 and 2006 at this very track, for example. Or Monaco in 1992, with Mansell trying everything to pass Senna but not being able to, which is considered a classic.
To add to that, there's a reason Montoya was one one of my favourite drivers. He found ways to overtake where others couldn't, he was very aggressive, never afraid to have a go. I think it's become a mentality amongst drivers that the cost of getting it wrong for the team is very expensive, so it deters them somewhat, and we've lost some of that attitude.