Hmmmmm, I don’t accept the vaccine roll out has little to do with the government. Nor do most fair minded people in the population.
Funding the development of Oxford vaccine and ensuring it was delivered through AZ at not for profit (not just good for us but rest of the world). Also ensuring contract gave us first access to U.K. ‘manufactured’ vaccines. Also funding supply chain in U.K. and partially in EU
Procurement - the main part (if you don’t have the vaccines you can’t do the roll out). Securing variety of vaccines quickly. Government led when many wanted us to join the EU procurement scheme, refusing to do this was, on reflection, a masterstroke
Decision to follow JVCI/PHE guidance and extend gap between doses - could’ve taken safe option and followed the world. Not only did this ensure more people got partially protected quickly but by all accounts the greater gap has provided better immunity.
Decision to follow JVCI/PHE guidance and stick to older age categories/high risk first (many wanted this changed to younger, healthier front line workers - hard to argue on the face of it but would’ve left higher risk people exposed for longer)
The roll out/delivery has been a combination of NHS/army (logistical planning) and volunteers so agreed limited direct government involvement...however much we all wanted Hancock to be running around administering vaccines !!
There have been plenty of government fuck ups but you’ve got to give credit where it’s due. people trying to down play the involvement and importance of some of the above decisions just weaken the strength of valid arguments elsewhere
My question to all is that if the vaccine roll out had gone poorly, would you be arguing that it’s not the governments fault because they didn’t have anything to do with it ?!