19/20 Accounts (7 Viewers)

mark82

Super Moderator
I was really hoping we'd get to spend the summer going over the same old 'how did we end up in Birmingham' and whose to blame. Who will be the first person to post up percentages of blame for all the parties involved?

Boring as fuck.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Boring as fuck.

That our owners dreadful strategy has lost us millions of pounds and made us uncompetitive in this league entirely through her own moronic behaviour?

ok
 
  • Like
Reactions: KAB

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The average crowd 2019/20 season at st Andrews was 6677.

There would have been a definite increase in crowds for the last 5 home games I would agree.

To increase the season average to 12000 would mean over 31000 for each of the 5 missing games. Possible but very very unlikely. Yes the final game could have been pushing 20000 but it would not have made a substantial difference to the finances after you deduct direct and other costs.

Would the average have been higher had we stayed at the Ricoh certainly in my opinion. Would the seasons average have been over 12000 more likely. The last game would probably be well over 20k

But none of this happened because of actions by the stake holders involved and that includes decisions and choices made by SISU. The effect of that has been to worsen the clubs financial position before the pandemic hit

Boring as fuck @mark82?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Wasps & CCFC.

So tell everyone what both parties said then - was this before Seppalla decided on the EU nonsense or after?
 

mark82

Super Moderator
So tell everyone what both parties said then - was this before Seppalla decided on the EU nonsense or after?

After. As I've said before, Sisu & CCFC believe the state aid case to be valid. Their perogative. I don't agree personally (or more that I believe the issues it's caused the club are not worth it). Reports of the reason for breakdown in talks last year not far wide of the mark (although I'm not sure the indemnity word was necessarily the most reflective, more restrictions of legal rights). Both sides positions are perfectly understandable and reasonable when seen through their eyes. Equally there is blame on both sides.
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
At other clubs fans unite attempting and some succeed to get rid of dodgepot owners here we go for tea and biscuits with them.
 
Last edited:

mark82

Super Moderator
At other clubs fans unite attempting and some succeed to good rid of dodgepot owners here we go for tea and biscuits with them.


giphy.gif
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
That our owners dreadful strategy has lost us millions of pounds and made us uncompetitive in this league entirely through her own moronic behaviour?

ok
Good job we’ve got Robins to counterbalance it then. Best finish ever under SISU in the championship despite their strategy losing us millions meaning he didn’t have a project premier league like Coleman. Thank god that taxi didn’t turn up hey.
 

bawtryneal

Well-Known Member
That our owners dreadful strategy has lost us millions of pounds and made us uncompetitive in this league entirely through her own moronic behaviour?

ok

How can you say we are not competitive when we finish mid table in our first season promoted when competing against several teams with ex Premier League players and parachute payments.
I would suggest the strategy ( if sustained with an improvement this year) should be applauded.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
How can you say we are not competitive when we finish mid table in our first season promoted when competing against several teams with ex Premier League players and parachute payments.
I would suggest the strategy ( if sustained with an improvement this year) should be applauded.

Mr Boddy and Mr Robbins are in agreement that the owners do not provide competitive funding don’t they? Didn’t robins claim our budget was worse than Wycombe?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You know perfectly well what I mean. You and a few others just taking it round in circles constantly. He's to blame, she's to blame. What do you get out of this? I'm assuming you must enjoy it? Or have you really got so little else to do with your time?

Interesting contribution in a thread designated to discussing the accounts
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
After. As I've said before, Sisu & CCFC believe the state aid case to be valid. Their perogative. I don't agree personally (or more that I believe the issues it's caused the club are not worth it). Reports of the reason for breakdown in talks last year not far wide of the mark (although I'm not sure the indemnity word was necessarily the most reflective, more restrictions of legal rights). Both sides positions are perfectly understandable and reasonable when seen through their eyes. Equally there is blame on both sides.

Im sure they do believe it to be valid. Also wasps response would be valid

If the boot was on the other foot I’m sure our commander in chief would have acted exactly as wasps did and the boot licker Boddy would have peddled it in a nice way - and you’d be peddling it back on here
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
Mr Boddy and Mr Robbins are in agreement that the owners do not provide competitive funding don’t they? Didn’t robins claim our budget was worse than Wycombe?

I feel there has been constant downplaying of the budget. Was claimed our budget was mid table for League 1 but the subsequent accounts and agent fees show that to be unlikely.

Our budget would have no doubt have been towards the bottom end but lower than Wycombe’s I would be amazed.
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
I feel there has been constant downplaying of the budget. Was claimed our budget was mid table for League 1 but the subsequent accounts and agent fees show that to be unlikely.

Our budget would have no doubt have been towards the bottom end but lower than Wycombe’s I would be amazed.
You could be correct, the club are not going to publicise how much money they have to spend as previously done as this would surely inflate transfers and agent fees!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
You could be correct, the club are not going to publicise how much money they have to spend as previously done as this would surely inflate transfers and agent fees!

The accounts publish what the owners have spent
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
You could be correct, the club are not going to publicise how much money they have to spend as previously done as this would surely inflate transfers and agent fees!

The commentators kept repeating in the Barnsley v Swansea match that Barnsley had a bottom 3 budget, if you listened to managers and chairman on their clubs budgets you’d think every club was cutting their cloth accordingly.
 

COV

Well-Known Member
Mr Boddy and Mr Robbins are in agreement that the owners do not provide competitive funding don’t they? Didn’t robins claim our budget was worse than Wycombe?

how did Wycombe get on last season with their bigger budget?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
how did Wycombe get on last season with their bigger budget?

They didn’t have a bigger budget - that’s my point.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
From 2 years ago though, they don't publish predicted expenditure

The owners haven’t invested a penny since 2012 - do you have any evidence this is changing
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
I feel there has been constant downplaying of the budget. Was claimed our budget was mid table for League 1 but the subsequent accounts and agent fees show that to be unlikely.

Our budget would have no doubt have been towards the bottom end but lower than Wycombe’s I would be amazed.

re League 1 have checked the 23 clubs

Not possible to get all the info on turnovers from Co House - not all companies have filed accounts yet. Some that have dont have to provide the detail. So missing info on 10 (Wycombe, Fleetwood, Doncaster, Gillingham, Ipswich, Bristol Rovers, Accrington, MK Dons, Southend & Bolton)

But it also depends on what you class as "income" not many League 1 teams make player sales of over £4m as we did in 2019/20 and the year before. Of the clubs i could look at only Oxford with £5.8m had better player sales income the rest were at least £1m less than CCFC some didnt even make it over £100k

Of those i could find detail on, then if you include player sales we are 5th with Sunderland (32m) unsurprisingly but also Portsmouth (£13m), Oxford(£12m) having more, with Rotherham being £250k more than us. We had £9.4m income on that basis

The missing ones are unlikely to be more than us with the exception of Ipswich perhaps

League positions CCFC 1st, Rotherham 2nd Oxford 4th Portsmouth 5th Sunderland 8th

Player trading forms part of the SCMP calculation in L1 & L2
 
Last edited:

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
re League 1 have checked the 23 clubs

Not possible to get info on turnovers from Co House - not all companies have filed accounts yet. Some that have dont have to provide the detail. So missing info on 10 (Wycombe, Fleetwood, Doncaster, Gillingham, Ipswich, Bristol Rovers, Accrington, MK Dons, Southend & Bolton)

But it also depends on what you class as "income" not many League 1 teams make player sales of over £4m as we did in 2019/20 and the year before.

Of those i could find detail on, then if you include player sales we are 5th with Sunderland (32m) unsurprisingly but also Portsmouth (£13m), Oxford(£12m) having more, with Rotherham being £250k more than us. We had £9.4m income on that basis

The missing ones are unlikely to be more than us with the exception of Ipswich perhaps

League positions CCFC 1st, Rotherham 2nd Oxford 4th Portsmouth 5th Sunderland 8th
So we had a top 5 budget based on player sales or add-ons!
 

oldskyblue58

CCFC Finance Director
So we had a top 5 budget based on player sales or add-ons!

Yes but if you just restrict it to non player sales income then we would be mid table, but we were playing in Birmingham and a sizeable number of fans voted with their feet and didnt go. Also depends on how many home games each club had left.

its all in how you say it or spin it
 

Gynnsthetonic

Well-Known Member
Yes but if you just restrict it to non player sales income then we would be mid table, but we were playing in Birmingham and a sizeable number of fans voted with their feet and didnt go. Also depends on how many home games each club had left.

its all in how you say it or spin it
Thanks OSB, the accounts will be interesting next year BUT won't every club!
 

bawtryneal

Well-Known Member
Mr Boddy and Mr Robbins are in agreement that the owners do not provide competitive funding don’t they? Didn’t robins claim our budget was worse than Wycombe?

So, they play games and use words to lower expectations or would you otherwise agree that the Robins and Boddy partnership had performed better than budgets and expectations
You cannot argue it both ways.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Im sure they do believe it to be valid. Also wasps response would be valid

If the boot was on the other foot I’m sure our commander in chief would have acted exactly as wasps did and the boot licker Boddy would have peddled it in a nice way - and you’d be peddling it back on here
You really do peddle the most emotive claptrap
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top