Coronavirus Thread (Off Topic, Politics) (178 Viewers)

Nick

Administrator
No and we have to yes

So again this should be about awareness too from the top.

It's all well and good saying close the country down or lock yourself away to stop COVID.

People should be made aware that if possible (note the if possible) then they should look to alter diet, exercise etc. (Again, people need exercise for mental health as well as losing weight, the whole first lockdown when people were being stopped for walks in the country was pathetic).
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
So again this should be about awareness too from the top.

It's all well and good saying close the country down or lock yourself away to stop COVID.

People should be made aware that if possible (note the if possible) then they should look to alter diet, exercise etc. (Again, people need exercise for mental health as well as losing weight, the whole first lockdown when people were being stopped for walks in the country was pathetic).
Yep and no one (notice the word no one) is saying close the country down and lock yourself away to stop Covid. We can’t stop it we need to live with it.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yep and no one (notice the word no one) is saying close the country down and lock yourself away to stop Covid. We can’t stop it we need to live with it.

There seems to me to be suddenly no faith in vaccination as sufficient protection. If it isn’t then we may as well permanently close every indoor business
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
So again this should be about awareness too from the top.

It's all well and good saying close the country down or lock yourself away to stop COVID.

People should be made aware that if possible (note the if possible) then they should look to alter diet, exercise etc. (Again, people need exercise for mental health as well as losing weight, the whole first lockdown when people were being stopped for walks in the country was pathetic).
Easy in hindsight mate, they were flying blind.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Went to buy some shoes, had to put on disposable socks to try them on. Then went to buy a shirt and was told it’s not possible to try them on so you have to pay then and bring it back if it doesn’t fit.

Surface transmission is not a thing FFS
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
The last few pages have been pretty timely for me.

Missus (double vaccinated) started getting a bit of a cough Tuesday so did a lateral flow test Wednesday and was negative, cough still there so did a lateral flow Thursday morning still negative.

Then got messages off her mates later that morning that 4/7 mates she was out with Sunday have tested positive with PCR tests (one works in a school, another a prison) so both me and her went for a PCR test yesterday.

Got our results this morning and she is positive and I am negative!!! I’m also double jabbed, have no symptoms but have got to stay in for a full 10 days? Why can’t I just got for another PCR test on say Monday if I have no more symptoms?

We were meant to be at her Goddaughters wedding tomorrow as well which obviously we now can’t go to. Which is a bonus!
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
The last few pages have been pretty timely for me.

Missus (double vaccinated) started getting a bit of a cough Tuesday so did a lateral flow test Wednesday and was negative, cough still there so did a lateral flow Thursday morning still negative.

Then got messages off her mates later that morning that 4/7 mates she was out with Sunday have tested positive with PCR tests (one works in a school, another a prison) so both me and her went for a PCR test yesterday.

Got our results this morning and she is positive and I am negative!!! I’m also double jabbed, have no symptoms but have got to stay in for a full 10 days? Why can’t I just got for another PCR test on say Monday if I have no more symptoms?

We were meant to be at her Goddaughters wedding tomorrow as well which obviously we now can’t go to. Which is a bonus!

Did she have any other symptoms LG? At least the vaccine blocked infection in your case :)
 

COV

Well-Known Member
72 hours later and still feel like crap… thankful it’s not the virus obviously but these side effects are a massive pain in the backside
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
72 hours later and still feel like crap… thankful it’s not the virus obviously but these side effects are a massive pain in the backside

Is it stopping your working on as an accountant for a construction company in Ireland or are you back in Hinckley now?
 

COV

Well-Known Member
Herd immunity in progress

Seems reasonable enough, it’ll work this time, can’t see any more lockdowns coming
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
The last few pages have been pretty timely for me.

Missus (double vaccinated) started getting a bit of a cough Tuesday so did a lateral flow test Wednesday and was negative, cough still there so did a lateral flow Thursday morning still negative.

Then got messages off her mates later that morning that 4/7 mates she was out with Sunday have tested positive with PCR tests (one works in a school, another a prison) so both me and her went for a PCR test yesterday.

Got our results this morning and she is positive and I am negative!!! I’m also double jabbed, have no symptoms but have got to stay in for a full 10 days? Why can’t I just got for another PCR test on say Monday if I have no more symptoms?

We were meant to be at her Goddaughters wedding tomorrow as well which obviously we now can’t go to. Which is a bonus!
Something will change about self isolation before august 19 it’s got to
 

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
We will never get to full vaccination anyway as there are alot who simply won't have the jabs ..so we have to leap into the unknown at some point no matter what.

Be in now or In 3 months that time will come and the same anxieties people have will be present .

And whenever we do it infections and hospitalisations will inevitably rise .
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
This is shaping up to be another fine mess from Lardy.


As Whitty indicated the alternative is to push this wave into autumn/winter where there is even less available beds. Or stay in lockdown for the next year ? They reckon due to last years lockdown and limited flu spread there could be 60k deaths

Just googled and found this...

I
This is obviously not just Johnson’s calls. There’s no easy way out of this mess. The current spread and hospitalisations have been accentuated by poor/slow take up of vaccine in certain ages and regions...maybe this is where people should be focussing more of their frustrations !

Edit - mentioned before, with hindsight I wouldn’t be surprised if they wish they’d allowed a greater gradual spread amongst certain age groups last summer, even without the vaccine
 

COV

Well-Known Member
As Whitty indicated the alternative is to push this wave into autumn/winter where there is even less available beds. Or stay in lockdown for the next year ? They reckon due to last years lockdown and limited flu spread there could be 60k deaths

Just googled and found this...

I
This is obviously not just Johnson’s calls. There’s no easy way out of this mess. The current spread and hospitalisations have been accentuated by poor/slow take up of vaccine in certain ages and regions...maybe this is where people should be focussing more of their frustrations !

Edit - mentioned before, with hindsight I wouldn’t be surprised if they wish they’d allowed a greater gradual spread amongst certain age groups last summer, even without the vaccine

Not disagreeing at all but why is it all or nothing, why can’t we have no lockdown plus some available beds too- why is it 100% one or the other, have we learned nothing in the last 18 months
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
As Whitty indicated the alternative is to push this wave into autumn/winter where there is even less available beds. Or stay in lockdown for the next year ? They reckon due to last years lockdown and limited flu spread there could be 60k deaths

Just googled and found this...

I
This is obviously not just Johnson’s calls. There’s no easy way out of this mess. The current spread and hospitalisations have been accentuated by poor/slow take up of vaccine in certain ages and regions...maybe this is where people should be focussing more of their frustrations !

Edit - mentioned before, with hindsight I wouldn’t be surprised if they wish they’d allowed a greater gradual spread amongst certain age groups last summer, even without the vaccine
We’re in this mess right now for one reason only. Boris failed to put India on the red list soon enough. We could have been 4 weeks further into the vaccine program so he’s missed 2 opportunities to slow the spread of the delta variant. How many more people can be double dosed in 4 weeks?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
There seems to me to be suddenly no faith in vaccination as sufficient protection. If it isn’t then we may as well permanently close every indoor business
The vaccine is brilliant but no vaccine is every going to be 100% and we're now seeing fully vaccinated people in hospital and dying. Shouldn't it be a case of having the vaccine alongside at least minimal attempts to reduce transmission?

If the vaccines cut risk of hospitalisation by 90% that's still a 1 in 10 chance of being hospitalised if you get it and when there's nothing being done to prevent spread and Javid predicting over 100K cases a day I don't think its unreasonable for people to have concerns. We seem to have come full circle back to the 'its only the elderly and people with pre-existing conditions' like they are expendable.

Again the messaging is all over the place and trying to find reliable information is hard. You've got people saying if you're fully vaccinated you can get back to normal life and not worry but then you've got the likes of Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter saying, “I’m 67, vaxxed to the eyeballs but actually an-unvaxxed 30 year old still has lower risk of dying from COVID than I have.”
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Herd immunity in progress
How will herd immunity work in practice? I understand the concept but doesn't it rely on those with the vaccine not getting covid and therefore not spreading it? How do you achieve herd immunity if everyone vaccinated can still get it and pass it on to others?
 

COV

Well-Known Member
How will herd immunity work in practice? I understand the concept but doesn't it rely on those with the vaccine not getting covid and therefore not spreading it? How do you achieve herd immunity if everyone vaccinated can still get it and pass it on to others?

I thought it meant that you can still get it, but the immunity meant that you might not even realise it/ only get mild symptoms?
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
It isn't right. It'll reduce the probability of hospitalisation by 90%, from whatever percentage it was in the first place.

Of course, the multiplier is spread x probability of hospitalisation as to how much of an overall risk it is. We're increasing the former while reducing the latter.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member

It isn't right

Your personal risk of hospitalisation is cut by 90%, not that 1 in 10 are at reduced risk.

So, that's why you see old people still being admitted, cos their chances of hospitalisation were already so much higher. The vaccine might bring their chances down by 90% but it still means they could be more likely to be hospitalised than say a 15 year old without a vaccine.
 

SBT

Well-Known Member
If the vaccines cut risk of hospitalisation by 90% that's still a 1 in 10 chance of being hospitalised if you get it and when there's nothing being done to prevent spread and Javid predicting over 100K cases a day I don't think its unreasonable for people to have concerns.

Yeah, this isn't right at all. '90% efficacy' means your chances of getting the virus decrease by 90%. It doesn't mean that only 90% of people are safe and the other 10% get the virus anyway.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I thought it meant that you can still get it, but the immunity meant that you might not even realise it/ only get mild symptoms?
Yeah, the logic is enough people build up some immunity so the spread decreases, and those who catch it don't suffer so much anyway. What vaccines are doing is turbocharging that to an earlier stage than it would otherwise be. What we're currently doing is overlapping the two things in the hope it works with a sweet spot.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
It isn't right

Your personal risk of hospitalisation is cut by 90%, not that 1 in 10 are at reduced risk.

So, that's why you see old people still being admitted, cos their chances of hospitalisation were already so much higher. The vaccine might bring their chances down by 90% but it still means they could be more likely to be hospitalised than say a 15 year old without a vaccine.
Somebody said (for better or worse as to how accurate, as I can't remember if the source was doctor or mentalist!) that the vaccine effectively chalks 30 years off your risk profile.

From a purely self-centred POV, I'd take that!!!
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The vaccine is brilliant but no vaccine is every going to be 100% and we're now seeing fully vaccinated people in hospital and dying. Shouldn't it be a case of having the vaccine alongside at least minimal attempts to reduce transmission?

If the vaccines cut risk of hospitalisation by 90% that's still a 1 in 10 chance of being hospitalised if you get it and when there's nothing being done to prevent spread and Javid predicting over 100K cases a day I don't think its unreasonable for people to have concerns. We seem to have come full circle back to the 'its only the elderly and people with pre-existing conditions' like they are expendable.

Again the messaging is all over the place and trying to find reliable information is hard. You've got people saying if you're fully vaccinated you can get back to normal life and not worry but then you've got the likes of Professor Sir David Spiegelhalter saying, “I’m 67, vaxxed to the eyeballs but actually an-unvaxxed 30 year old still has lower risk of dying from COVID than I have.”

90% is much better than the flu jab. Do you think we should just lockdown for ever and also should have for the last decade or so with needless flu deaths

You post a lot but never offer a practical solution
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top