usskyblue
Well-Known Member
It sounds almost like you want one of our own players to fail, perhaps simply to prove your own point.
If he is messing the club about then he won't get near the first team and will be out of the door or in the bomb squad pretty quickly.
That doesn't seem to have happened yet so presumably Robins still thinks there is still a chance that he can get properly fit and be a positive influence in the squad.
If Robins thinks that, knowing that he can be ruthless with players who have served him far better than Bright, why keep carping on?
There is no doubt that to challenge for a place in this squad, even to get a place on the bench, Bright will have to work his socks off and be 100% committed to the team. If he reaches that level then great. If he doesn't then it can be put down to a gamble that failed.
What certainly doesn't seem to be the case is that his presence is having any sort of negative effect on team or squad.
In 55 years of watching City I have rarely seen a team so committed, so up for each game.
With this as the case, why not let the story of Bright play out one way or the other instead of appearing so desperate for one of our players to fail?
Tobyfair there’s a discussion amongst some people but it’s largely been a tag team of a few that have headed up this little ‘campaign’ and others have lumped on. I don’t think it’s a hope of failure, just a need to be right at any cost, which, given it’s one of our own players, is a little bizarre… but not new for whatever fucking reason.
Up to them I guess but going ‘all-in’ either way when no one really knows what’s actually going on… not even the ITK’s… is literally like begging for a hindsight fuck. And given that one of the instigators has had their arse bored to three times it’s normal circumference by repeatedly calling for taxis, you’d think they’d know better ?