Do you want to discuss boring politics? (119 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Marty made a point (badly) that the people on this topic had buried the Claudia Webbe story which was bollocks.
Then you’ve weighed in with some irrelevant whataboutery crap that has no connection to anything that was discussed.
Speaking of hypocrisy - still waiting for you to demonstrate where you called out convicted sex offender Charlie Elphicke on this board…. Interests of balance and all that.

I assume if Mr Elphicke was a labour MP and the left gathered round to defend them in the same way they have the odious Ms Webbe you’d be opposed and yet you seem to have not condemned their defence of Ms Webbe. Do you agree with their staunch defence of the acid chucker?
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
I assume if Mr Elphicke was a labour MP and the left gathered round to defend them in the same way they have the odious Ms Webbe you’d be opposed and yet you seem to have not condemned their defence of Ms Webbe. Do you agree with their staunch defence of the acid chucker?
The only people that gather round to defend sex offenders are the Tories (see also Jimmy Saville)
As for Miss Webbe - who threatened to chuck acid of you wish to be pedantic, her political persuasion is irrelevant. It’s only you (as usual) trying to gain mileage out of it as a distraction.
And for absolute clarity - of course she deserves to be sacked/expelled/charged - this kind of behaviour is not acceptable. She should not be able to hold a public office as a result.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The only people that gather round to defend sex offenders are the Tories (see also Jimmy Saville)
As for Miss Webbe - who threatened to chuck acid of you wish to be pedantic, her political persuasion is irrelevant. It’s only you (as usual) trying to gain mileage out of it as a distraction.

with respect it’s you that’s distracting and not answering a question - do you think the character references are appropriate in a court of law from sitting MPs - I’ve asked 3 times - please answer
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
with respect it’s you that’s distracting and not answering a question - do you think the character references are appropriate in a court of law from sitting MPs - I’ve asked 3 times - please answer
Why don’t you post the character references on here, we can all have a look and then debate from there.
Also, as you are no doubt aware - 4 MP’s gave character reference for the convicted sex offender Charlie Elphicke. Bob Stewart, Sir Robert Gale, Adam Holloway, Theresa Villiers as well as peer Lord Freud.

There were also a number of references for him from local Conservative Party councillors and members, business leaders from his local area. I’ve attached a link for your perusal.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/R-v-Charles-Elphicke-Character-References.pdf

EDIT: Silly me, how could I forget the character reference from Johnathon Aitken who himself was *checks notes* imprisoned for perverting the course of justice.
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Why don’t you post the character references on here, we can all have a look and then debate from there.
Also, as you are no doubt aware - 4 MP’s gave character reference for the convicted sex offender Charlie Elphicke. Bob Stewart, Sir Robert Gale, Adam Holloway, Theresa Villiers as well as peer Lord Freud.

There were also a number of references for him from local Conservative Party councillors and members, business leaders from his local area. I’ve attached a link for your perusal.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/R-v-Charles-Elphicke-Character-References.pdf

Ian I’ve linked the references and asked you to discuss but you’ve decided not to and thrown Tory examples in

classic whatabotery
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
And she was immediately kicked out of her party rather than her party trying to change the rules to get her off.

He didn’t actually face a criminal prosecution- bizarre comparison
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
Ian I’ve linked the references and asked you to discuss but you’ve decided not to and thrown Tory examples in

classic whatabotery
Classic Grendel, no answer when push comes to shove. No wonder you’re a Tory sycophant.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Why don’t you post the character references on here, we can all have a look and then debate from there.
Also, as you are no doubt aware - 4 MP’s gave character reference for the convicted sex offender Charlie Elphicke. Bob Stewart, Sir Robert Gale, Adam Holloway, Theresa Villiers as well as peer Lord Freud.

There were also a number of references for him from local Conservative Party councillors and members, business leaders from his local area. I’ve attached a link for your perusal.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/R-v-Charles-Elphicke-Character-References.pdf
Labour also didn’t reinstate the whip like the Tories did with Elphicke only to have to withdraw it again when he was charged a year later.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Classic Grendel, no answer when push comes to shove. No wonder you’re a Tory sycophant.

with respect I’ve asked you several times. As ever the left spit, snarl, insult and patronise. Then wonder why they are political nonentities
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
with respect I’ve asked you several times. As ever the left spit, snarl, insult and patronise. Then wonder why they are political nonentities
With respect you should probably sit down as all the spin and deflection has probably made you dizzy.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
With respect you should probably sit down as all the spin and deflection has probably made you dizzy.

No in 3 years I’ll celebrate another Tory landslide and you’ll still be steeped in jealousy and bitterness
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I assume if Mr Elphicke was a labour MP and the left gathered round to defend them in the same way they have the odious Ms Webbe you’d be opposed and yet you seem to have not condemned their defence of Ms Webbe. Do you agree with their staunch defence of the acid chucker?

Classic deflection and whataboutery.

The facts are he wasn't Labour. He was a Tory. Who reinstated the whip after having previously removed it when the allegations came to light. After having it removed again he was then convicted and imprisoned.

Do you support that move to reinstate him or do you think your beloved Tories did something heinous in allowing a sex offender back in and thus showing staunch support for him?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Classic deflection and whataboutery.

The facts are he wasn't Labour. He was a Tory. Who reinstated the whip after having previously removed it when the allegations came to light. After having it removed again he was then convicted and imprisoned.

Do you support that move to reinstate him or do you think your beloved Tories did something heinous in allowing a sex offender back in and thus showing staunch support for him?

the facts are dumbo the Webbe case was raised first and Ian changed the subject

he was tried and convicted so that’s process

I vote Tory as it gives me the lifestyle that suits me and my family and a labour government would personally disadvantage me so actually if you really want the brutal truth I don’t give a flying fuck about him the acid chucker or anyone else

I care about me the people whose jobs rely on me and my immediate family. No one else
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No he was just corrupt. So something actually relevant to his role as an MP instead of just being a mental girlfriend.

You realise they’ve u-turned right? You’re out on your own defending this shite at this point.

Im on my own. Ha ha against you and the handful on SBT who care. Wow. I’m backed in a corner I’m scared what’s going to happen - are you sending me to a special place to be re educated
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
the facts are dumbo the Webbe case was raised first and Ian changed the subject

he was tried and convicted so that’s process

I vote Tory as it gives me the lifestyle that suits me and my family and a labour government would personally disadvantage me so actually if you really want the brutal truth I don’t give a flying fuck about him the acid chucker or anyone else

I care about me the people whose jobs rely on me and my immediate family. No one else

Take it you don’t have a job then 🤣

1636053870731.jpeg
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
the facts are dumbo the Webbe case was raised first and Ian changed the subject

he was tried and convicted so that’s process

I vote Tory as it gives me the lifestyle that suits me and my family and a labour government would personally disadvantage me so actually if you really want the brutal truth I don’t give a flying fuck about him the acid chucker or anyone else

I care about me the people whose jobs rely on me and my immediate family. No one else

no it wasn't. Marty raised it to try and deflect from the Patterson story being being discussed again after another change of heart from the world u turn champion. .
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
no it wasn't. Marty raised it to try and deflect from the Patterson story being being discussed again after another change of heart from the world u turn champion. .

I’m referencing Webbe vs Elphick and oddly I’ve raised her case a while ago on this thread
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
I care about me the people whose jobs rely on me and my immediate family. No one else

And there it is.

Classic Tory.

I'm alright Jack. Fuck everyone else.


tory-boy.gif
 

Northants Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I care about me the people whose jobs rely on me and my immediate family. No one else

Usual question for anyone of this mindset:

If walking down the street one day you see a child hit by a car, a woman being assaulted or even an old dear struggling on some black ice would you ignore simply because they weren't family?
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Usual question for anyone of this mindset:

If walking down the street one day they, god forbid, see a child hit by a car, a woman assaulted by her partner or even an old dear struggling on some black ice would they ignore it simply because they weren't family?

A terrible analogy
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
Usual question for anyone of this mindset:

If walking down the street one day they, god forbid, see a child hit by a car, a woman assaulted by her partner or even an old dear struggling on some black ice would they ignore it simply because they weren't family?
In those immediate incidents sympathy is required. Tories are quite good at sympathy so would probably assist.
What they lack is empathy as they don't have the emotional intelligence to discern suffering that doesn't have an obvious cause.
Just my opinion.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Usual question for anyone of this mindset:

If walking down the street one day they, god forbid, see a child hit by a car, a woman assaulted by her partner or even an old dear struggling on some black ice would they ignore it simply because they weren't family?

He would help the old dear off the ice and take credit for being a lovely man, a man of the people.

Then the lady gets home and realises her purse is missing.
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
Usual question for anyone of this mindset:

If walking down the street one day they, god forbid, see a child hit by a car, a woman assaulted by her partner or even an old dear struggling on some black ice would they ignore it simply because they weren't family?
Yes, exactly the same. As analogies go, that's up there with one of the worst I've seen on this forum.

Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
 

oakey

Well-Known Member
There are better questions
- Approaching the CBS arena
- You have already brought snacks & treats.
- Someone is collecting for a foodbank
- You notice you have a fiver spare.
Do you (a) stick the fiver in the collection?
(b) buy your child / grandchild an EXTRA treat?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top