Do you want to discuss boring politics? (241 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well exactly. Doesn’t inspire much in me at the moment and I’m not sure how he gets on against another charlatan candidate

You say another charlatan candidate but really Starmer should stand for something. It’s clear he won’t reverse the NI price hike, lots of waffle, won’t alter the fuel price caps either - what does he stand for
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
You say another charlatan candidate but really Starmer should stand for something. It’s clear he won’t reverse the NI price hike, lots of waffle, won’t alter the fuel price caps either - what does he stand for

Well I mean a snake oil salesman with perceived charisma is enough to romp home in this country
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well I mean a snake oil salesman with perceived charisma is enough to romp home in this country

Only time a labour leader has won in half a century is what you are describing - Major and May you certainly can’t say had very much charisma
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I’m not expecting policies right now. Just when the time comes I want an optimistic campaign

Its hard. Activists want change cos they’re activists, most voters want reassurance not too much will change.

My expectations are so low after 12 years of Tories I just want properly funded services and a focus on people not a few elites TBH. I’d love some groundbreaking policy, but it’s all second term stuff. So annoying Blair wasted his capital on privatised services and war (as well as the good stuff), 2001-2005 he could’ve got some real change through.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I want to see Labour run on what they have to offer, instead of going ‘we aren’t them’. Just offer a positive campaign based mostly on economic solutions for working people.
I love your optimism, but that sort of stuff just doesn't work anymore.

Fact is labour could come up with an extremely sensible and costed manifesto and there'd still be this overriding perception in far too many people that Labour are economically illiterate while the Tories are adept at running an economy.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
By all accounts Johnson doesn’t like confrontation, so maybe there’s a deal done ie resign with a bit of dignity or get the boot. Or they jumped first knowing they’d be pushed. Reynolds and Rosenfield were 99% certain to go, plus one of the others I think. Not sure the other two were though

There is no chance of Boris leaving with dignity.

The best he can hope for is avoiding this
giphy.gif
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I love your optimism, but that sort of stuff just doesn't work anymore.

Fact is labour could come up with an extremely sensible and costed manifesto and there'd still be this overriding perception in far too many people that Labour are economically illiterate while the Tories are adept at running an economy.

Well I simply mean

Lower or eliminate VAT
Raise the minimum wage
Raise corporation tax and top end tax rates

Focus on people’s pockets
 

JAM See

Well-Known Member
I love your optimism, but that sort of stuff just doesn't work anymore.

Fact is labour could come up with an extremely sensible and costed manifesto and there'd still be this overriding perception in far too many people that Labour are economically illiterate while the Tories are adept at running an economy.
That's the approach Labour need to take.

i.e. Hammer the Tories for their appalling fiscal management since the last election.

They are not the party to be trusted with our taxes.

I'd also go hard on the Owen Paterson shambles. "When we break the rules, we change the rules" Something like that.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
I love your optimism, but that sort of stuff just doesn't work anymore.

Fact is labour could come up with an extremely sensible and costed manifesto and there'd still be this overriding perception in far too many people that Labour are economically illiterate while the Tories are adept at running an economy.

I think that’s a bit pessimistic. Questions are being raised about Tories and the economy recently (especially wastage) so as long as Starmer avoids Corbynomics he should be ok.

Stuff like a one off windfall tax on energy companies whos profits have shot up due to energy crisis are well received by public. I really think the government missed a trick by not getting even a smallish sum out of fuel companies like shell etc
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Well I simply mean

Lower or eliminate VAT
Raise the minimum wage
Raise corporation tax and top end tax rates

Focus on people’s pockets

All good points and policies.

But will achieve very little if delivered in a staid, uncharismatic manner. Which is what Starmer is likely to do. He'd be professional, but would likely lose to someone with a personality.

I feel by the time of another election most people won't care about 'Boris'' nonsense if he's not in charge, even though those same people were just as complicit.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
All good points and policies.

But will achieve very little if delivered in a staid, uncharismatic manner. Which is what Starmer is likely to do. He'd be professional, but would likely lose to someone with a personality.

I feel by the time of another election most people won't care about 'Boris'' nonsense if he's not in charge, even though those same people were just as complicit.

Tactical injection of Andy Burnham please
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
I mean he laughs but the last man to romp home just told jokes and hid from the press

Burnham would be considered far right in the eyes of Unite and the dumbass labour members
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
The union circles I mix in disagree

Well good for you. He also earns a 6 figure salary plus expenses and lives where he is happy living - what’s his incentive
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Well good for you. He also earns a 6 figure salary plus expenses and lives where he is happy living - what’s his incentive

Didn’t say I expected it to happen just would be my preferred choice. Starmer also presumably would have been better off financially in law than politics
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Didn’t say I expected it to happen just would be my preferred choice. Starmer also presumably would have been better off financially in law than politics

Burnham is in politics and admits is far happier where he is
 

JAM See

Well-Known Member
Well good for you. He also earns a 6 figure salary plus expenses and lives where he is happy living - what’s his incentive
I dunno. Maybe he has the the best interests of the majority of the 65 million inhabitants of the UK at heart...

or maybe he wants to be...

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top