Bristol City calling for salary cap (7 Viewers)

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
That's it though. Norwich go up with a reasonable expectation they would come back down again. Is that really something to look forward to? Having a great season then knowing you're going to get battered the next?

Burnley have been PL for years and so used to that level and now paying higher fees and wages . Coming down would need a massive change in their costs, even with parachute payments. Which just goes to show how ridiculous the financial situation is and the problems just getting rid of the payments without other measures in place would cause.


Burnley will have to sell the players they can and have a lot of free agents and their new owners have loaded them up with debt they are in a load of trouble.

Yes getting rid of the payments would cause an issue to the teams coming down but that’s tough the reward for failure in the top league is staggering.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Burnley will have to sell the players they can and have a lot of free agents and their new owners have loaded them up with debt they are in a load of trouble.

Yes getting rid of the payments would cause an issue to the teams coming down but that’s tough the reward for failure in the top league is staggering.

you are basically advocating total and complete dominance from the big clubs with the rest scraping the barrel - it would be as bad as the Scottish league
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
you are basically advocating total and complete dominance from the big clubs with the rest scraping the barrel - it would be as bad as the Scottish league


They have it anyway, the Scottish league has two teams as do most of the European leagues in the prem there are about eight or nine teams that could challenge which is nearly half the league.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
They have it anyway, the Scottish league has two teams as do most of the European leagues in the prem there are about eight or nine teams that could challenge which is nearly half the league.
Who would you say could realistically challenge Man City and Liverpool?

The likes of Arsenal and Tottenham are now more like an Atletico Madrid. Man U are drifting that way but the right manager with their income streams and name could turn them around quickly.

Sides like leicester are decent top half teams who might have an amazing season and finish a bit higher.

Of course, Newcastle in the next five years could be a challenger, although all that shows is how much cash makes a difference..
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Parachute payments in themselves are not the problem, they're a symptom of the problem which to my mind the only answer is abolishing the PL, reuniting the EFL and aggregating and distributing the TV income across the leagues more evenly but with progressively larger shares, eg. 40:30:20:10
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Who would you say could realistically challenge Man City and Liverpool?

The likes of Arsenal and Tottenham are now more like an Atletico Madrid. Man U are drifting that way but the right manager with their income streams and name could turn them around quickly.

Sides like leicester are decent top half teams who might have an amazing season and finish a bit higher.

Of course, Newcastle in the next five years could be a challenger, although all that shows is how much cash makes a difference..


You could add the world club champions in.
 

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
I agree that a flat salary cap for all isn't fair. If you earn more you should be able to spend more. just not so much that it jeopardises the future of the club.
This is why I've little sympathy for those making the point. They tried to succeed by overpaying and failed, so now they can't do it anymore they want everyone hamstrung.

It should be based on 'guaranteed' income like you say. I wouldn't be averse to allowing end of season bonuses IF their income was higher than expected. I'd use in conjunction with:



I think those teams that are successful/have good followings have the right to use the extra income that generates for their own benefit, but I also firmly believe they shouldn't be able to stack the deck in their favour because of it.
Now you’re arguing with yourself
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
If the parachute payments were to pay the over inflated wages then there is a point but when you get to Jan and spend millions on a new striker like West Brom or millions on half a team as in Bournemouth then you have to question them.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Now you’re arguing with yourself
It's called a balanced argument.

Teams shouldn't be able to use their power to load everything in their favour, but neither would it be fair for teams to be given absolute parity for being less successful.

For example, in the NFL the worst team in the league gets first choice of the up and coming players. Literally rewarding failure. It's only sports, but it's a billion-dollar industry. Would you be happy if you were a market leader in your industry and got told you couldn't spend more than your competitors or that those same competitors would get first choice of talent within it?

It's treading that line between rewarding success and not allowing them to abuse it.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Derby have been deducted 21 points to far for financial irregularities, at one point we’re at risk of seriously going bust, yet still paying players 20/30K a week.

The whole thing is a mess.

Their cheating was so effective they’ll probably stay up even with 21 points taken off
 

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
It's called a balanced argument.

Teams shouldn't be able to use their power to load everything in their favour, but neither would it be fair for teams to be given absolute parity for being less successful.

For example, in the NFL the worst team in the league gets first choice of the up and coming players. Literally rewarding failure. It's only sports, but it's a billion-dollar industry. Would you be happy if you were a market leader in your industry and got told you couldn't spend more than your competitors or that those same competitors would get first choice of talent within it?

It's treading that line between rewarding success and not allowing them to abuse it.
My comment was actually tounge in cheek regarding the last paragraph of your original post. I actually agree with your philosophy. It’s just a shame that sport has become so business oriented.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Bristol City telling Celtic they couldn't afford Semenyo, as he'll be £20m. Shows what we need to be doing re: Gyo's suitors, when they come calling.
 

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
Something does need to be done Reading have been punished this season and they are only allowed to spend up to 21 million in wages this season, its reduced to 15 for next season...
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Something does need to be done Reading have been punished this season and they are only allowed to spend up to 21 million in wages this season, its reduced to 15 for next season...

£15 million would be very low in comparison to many in the league
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
Well according to his Wikipedia it’s 5 in 70 perhaps not updated but a lot lless this season than Gyo or Godden, if the likes of Semenyo moves for anything like what Bristol City want tells us all why football is financially in the shite.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
Well according to his Wikipedia it’s 5 in 70 perhaps not updated but a lot lless this season than Gyo or Godden, if the likes of Semenyo moves for anything like what Bristol City want tells us all why football is financially in the shite.
He’s 22 - not sure why you’re comparing his value to 30yo Godden
 

SkyblueDad

Well-Known Member
That’s where you show a bit of ignorance not many players have more than 3 years at one club, Godden delivers every season so in his next three seasons if he delivers 40 goals okay his value at 33 might not be the same as someone 25 and that’s IF that player such as Semenyo delivers 40+goals, don’t know really why bothering talking Bristol City but it’s a classic case in my opinion, of an owner trying to recoup money he’s spunked away trying to buy into the premiership
 

Old Warwickshire lad

Well-Known Member
Parachute payments in themselves are not the problem, they're a symptom of the problem which to my mind the only answer is abolishing the PL, reuniting the EFL and aggregating and distributing the TV income across the leagues more evenly but with progressively larger shares, eg. 40:30:20:10
Nice thought. But not a cat in hells chance. Premier league want a bigger slice of the cake ,not smaller.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
Would you buy his attributes then and for how much,

Watch the highlights from their last game v M'Boro and you can see the lad has talent. Scored one, made one and nearly scored an outrageous goal that just cleared the bar.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
Capping wages will never work, bad owners will just resort to the under the counter "bung" to attract players.
That just means the tax man misses out as well.
 

edgy

Well-Known Member
I've not given this much thought but wouldn't you just see all the best players leaving for leagues that don't have a salary cap? Resulting in a much lower quality product.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
I've not given this much thought but wouldn't you just see all the best players leaving for leagues that don't have a salary cap? Resulting in a much lower quality product.

Most likely or, as @fatso suggests you will get scenarios similar to Saracens Rugby where they "top up" the max salary with ridiculous bonuses even as far as property investment etc.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top