Sky Blues Trust (8 Viewers)

Forums New posts
Esoterica

Esoterica

Well-Known Member
Frostie said:
Yep & still pulling the strings for the Trust despite their claims to the contrary.

View attachment 24964
Click to expand...
Roger Titford...

giphy.gif
 
Bad Boy

Bad Boy

Well-Known Member
I used to be a member of the SBT a long long time ago (early naughties) so I have no idea what this thread is about and what went on that has led to the strength of feeling displayed on the forum, genuinely, I'm not winding anyone up.
Anyone care to enlighten me or am I better off living in ignorance?
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
bad boy said:
I used to be a member of the SBT a long long time ago (early naughties) so I have no idea what this thread is about and what went on that has led to the strength of feeling displayed on the forum, genuinely, I'm not winding anyone up.
Anyone care to enlighten me or am I better off living in ignorance?
Click to expand...

Read the thread. But generally the Northampton period was fucking horrible and both sides were convinced the other was a super secret council/Sisu mole and it led to some pretty shitty behaviour.

Seemingly for some it was a grand old time cos we keep reminiscing about it. Fact is a bunch of people who care about CCFC had that used for other peoples own ends. Of course when I do it it’s reasonable and understandable, when someone else does it it’s a sign of moral failing and evidence they’re a nonce or something.

Fact is both sides thought the other would lead to the destruction of their club and understandably got quite angry/upset at that thought.
 
Liquid Gold

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Read the thread. But generally the Northampton period was fucking horrible and both sides were convinced the other was a super secret council/Sisu mole and it led to some pretty shitty behaviour.

Seemingly for some it was a grand old time cos we keep reminiscing about it. Fact is a bunch of people who care about CCFC had that used for other peoples own ends. Of course when I do it it’s reasonable and understandable, when someone else does it it’s a sign of moral failing and evidence they’re a nonce or something.

Fact is both sides thought the other would lead to the destruction of their club and understandably got quite angry/upset at that thought.
Click to expand...
Nice both sidesing something where one side was doxxing, harassing, trying to get people sacked and the other was posting on a forum.
 
shmmeee

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Liquid Gold said:
Nice both sidesing something where one side was doxxing, harassing, trying to get people sacked and the other was posting on a forum.
Click to expand...

The other wasn’t innocent either and Grendel is in this thread doxxing and harassing for example.

Obviously you have one view because you experienced it, others who experienced it the other way have another.

But sure it was Avengers: Ricoh Arena and you were Captain America.
 
Liquid Gold

Liquid Gold

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
The other wasn’t innocent either and Grendel is in this thread doxxing and harassing for example.

Obviously you have one view because you experienced it, others who experienced it the other way have another.

But sure it was Avengers: Ricoh Arena and you were Captain America.
Click to expand...
You really throw your toys out of the pram when challenged.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
The other wasn’t innocent either and Grendel is in this thread doxxing and harassing for example.

Obviously you have one view because you experienced it, others who experienced it the other way have another.

But sure it was Avengers: Ricoh Arena and you were Captain America.
Click to expand...

what are you on about?
 
Nick

Nick

Administrator
shmmeee said:
Read the thread. But generally the Northampton period was fucking horrible and both sides were convinced the other was a super secret council/Sisu mole and it led to some pretty shitty behaviour.

Seemingly for some it was a grand old time cos we keep reminiscing about it. Fact is a bunch of people who care about CCFC had that used for other peoples own ends. Of course when I do it it’s reasonable and understandable, when someone else does it it’s a sign of moral failing and evidence they’re a nonce or something.

Fact is both sides thought the other would lead to the destruction of their club and understandably got quite angry/upset at that thought.
Click to expand...
Thing is. They were actually in with the council and then wasps. All while they went on about anybody who pointed this out being on sisus payroll.

Even when I pointed out what they were up to i took so much "get your tin foil hat on". I was actually right.
 
Bad Boy

Bad Boy

Well-Known Member
shmmeee said:
Read the thread. But generally the Northampton period was fucking horrible and both sides were convinced the other was a super secret council/Sisu mole and it led to some pretty shitty behaviour.

Seemingly for some it was a grand old time cos we keep reminiscing about it. Fact is a bunch of people who care about CCFC had that used for other peoples own ends. Of course when I do it it’s reasonable and understandable, when someone else does it it’s a sign of moral failing and evidence they’re a nonce or something.

Fact is both sides thought the other would lead to the destruction of their club and understandably got quite angry/upset at that thought.
Click to expand...
I did, have done a few times shmmeee but maybe I'm thick and it didn't make much sense but thank you for explaining and I kind of understand a little better.
All the best to you and to others that have responded.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Nick said:
Thing is. They were actually in with the council and then wasps. All while they went on about anybody who pointed this out being on sisus payroll.

Even when I pointed out what they were up to i took so much "get your tin foil hat on". I was actually right.
Click to expand...

when you had the trust along with the council parading a show pony and now bankrupt yank round the ground when he had no means or intent on buying the ground it’s pretty obvious they were unfit for any purpose

He always gets angry when this comes up
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Heard about some bizarre shit on this forum, but contacting people’s employers and posting pictures of people’s houses?
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
Heard about some bizarre shit on this forum, but contacting people’s employers and posting pictures of people’s houses?
Click to expand...

Oh when someone says to me they are going to knock in my door and threaten me (when it’s not me) and then use my details to complain about someone who works in a school dead right they get a picture of where they live - it’s funny how a lot of things stopped very quickly after that
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Oh when someone says to me they are going to knock in my door and threaten me (when it’s not me) and then use my details to complain about someone who works in a school dead right they get a picture of where they live - it’s funny how a lot of things stopped very quickly after that
Click to expand...

I can understand why you’d be upset but it sounds like deeply weird and borderline sociopathic behaviour all round to me.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
I can understand why you’d be upset but it sounds like deeply weird and borderline sociopathic behaviour all round to me.
Click to expand...

Not really. It’s not all round is it. And I wasn’t upset - others were and felt threatened by unacceptable behaviour

what would you have done - called your friends at Cov Tel?
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Not really. It’s not all round is it. And I wasn’t upset - others were and felt threatened by unacceptable behaviour

what would you have done - called your friends at Cov Tel?
Click to expand...

If someone was (unsuccessfully) trying to threaten me and was going around impersonating me then I would probably either ignore them, or if I felt it was warranted, I would go to the police. I can’t honestly say that starting my own vigilante intimidation campaign in response on my “very active” social media account would cross my mind.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
If someone was (unsuccessfully) trying to threaten me and was going around impersonating me then I would probably either ignore them, or if I felt it was warranted, I would go to the police. I can’t honestly say that starting my own vigilante intimidation campaign in response on my “very active” social media account would cross my mind.
Click to expand...

You’d go to the police - and say what? lol a vigilante campaign - what a funny person you are
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
What’s funny about it?

If you’re not sure on what you could have done instead then even the Met has some pointers:
Click to expand...

Yeah right - it’s really funny as if what happened to some on here - not me as I just thought it was funny - to you youd love it wouldn’t you.

Calling the police - yes they really are going to to do a search aren’t they of anonymous social media accounts and try and link them to other e mail accounts and random phone calls to employers

Vigilante action - it’s hardly Charles Bronson is it
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
Yeah right - it’s really funny as if what happened to some on here - not me as I just thought it was funny - to you youd love it wouldn’t you.

Calling the police - yes they really are going to to do a search aren’t they of anonymous social media accounts and try and link them to other e mail accounts and random phone calls to employers

Vigilante action - it’s hardly Charles Bronson is it
Click to expand...

What are you talking about? That first sentence is too garbled to make sense of.

As I said, I’d probably just ignore anonymous and ineffectual threats online - it takes an odd sort to think the better course of action was posting pictures of someone’s house online. Some people these days just don’t know when to log off it seems.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
What are you talking about? That first sentence is too garbled to make sense of.

As I said, I’d probably just ignore anonymous and ineffectual threats online - it takes an odd sort to think the better course of action was posting pictures of someone’s house online. Some people these days just don’t know when to log off it seems.
Click to expand...

So if someone PMd you and said they’d been given a letter of complaint by their governors from a parent - which was me - and he asked me what’s best to do and I resolved it by that simple action that was good wasn’t it?

Liquid Gold was getting a similar accusation as had Nick.

You either stop it in 5 minutes as cowards are stupid and easily dealt with or people lose their jobs at worst or have embarrassing conversions at best

It stopped almost instantly. That’s good for those threatened isn’t it?
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
So if someone PMd you and said they’d been given a letter of complaint by their governors from a parent - which was me - and he asked me what’s best to do and I resolved it by that simple action that was good wasn’t it?

Liquid Gold was getting a similar accusation as had Nick.

You either stop it in 5 minutes as cowards are stupid and easily dealt with or people lose their jobs at worst or have embarrassing conversions at best

It stopped almost instantly. That’s good for those threatened isn’t it?
Click to expand...

Well clearly not everyone else facing the same situation decided to take the same action as you. I’m sure there must be someone who found what you did to be very brave and honourable, perfectly normal behaviour - personally that’s not a view I share.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
What are you talking about? That first sentence is too garbled to make sense of.

As I said, I’d probably just ignore anonymous and ineffectual threats online - it takes an odd sort to think the better course of action was posting pictures of someone’s house online. Some people these days just don’t know when to log off it seems.
Click to expand...

Not sure what your line of work is but the governors' case could have seen whoever it was in serious shit. If the perpetrator got scared off by G's actions it's fair game
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Not sure what your line of work is but the governors' case could have seen whoever it was in serious shit. If the perpetrator got scared off by G's actions it's fair game
Click to expand...
Which is also why I'd be going to the police if someone contacted my employers trying to get me sacked, however. Not just for me, and the desire to prove it's all quite malicious, but also for whoever else they might do it to in the future.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Deleted member 5849 said:
Which is also why I'd be going to the police if someone contacted my employers trying to get me sacked, however. Not just for me, and the desire to prove it's all quite malicious, but also for whoever else they might do it to in the future.
Click to expand...

Of course, which means if anything what G did was on the lenient side. I'm still struggling to believe it got to that stage.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Brighton Sky Blue said:
Not sure what your line of work is but the governors' case could have seen whoever it was in serious shit. If the perpetrator got scared off by G's actions it's fair game
Click to expand...

Well yes, as I said, I’d be seriously weirded out if someone tried to get me sacked for no reason. Same as if someone started posting pictures of my house on their “very active” social media accounts. I don’t see a good justification for either, especially when we’re talking about football supporter group internal politics.
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
Well yes, as I said, I’d be seriously weirded out if someone tried to get me sacked for no reason. Same as if someone started posting pictures of my house on their “very active” social media accounts. I don’t see a good justification for either, especially when we’re talking about football supporter group internal politics.
Click to expand...

No we are talking about people losing their jobs and you saying you wouldn’t give a fuck about that and hiding behind your oh so pious principles
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
Grendel said:
No we are talking about people losing their jobs and you saying you wouldn’t give a fuck about that and hiding behind your oh so pious principles
Click to expand...

It’s pious to find it weird and morally dubious to post pictures of people’s houses online?
 
Grendel

Grendel

Well-Known Member
SBT said:
It’s pious to find it weird and morally dubious to post pictures of people’s houses online?
Click to expand...

Yes - you are coming across as a total spineless selfish c**t to be honest
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 9 (members: 0, guests: 9)
Top