why is it anything SISU does cannot be done without legal challenges getting involved
Not sure that Storey or his lawyers will get much traction from the EFL or courts
To do any deal with SISU the first thing they ask for is proof of funds - i assume this was done (not a betting slip but real bank confirmation)
That gets you to the negotiating table
Heads of terms are fine but have been proven in court time and again NOT to be legally binding.
Exclusivity periods have defined dates and are not open ended, they can be extended if
both parties agree
the Storey exclusivity ran out on the 7th King deal announced 16th. Now i am not sure there is anything stopping King making contact before that and so long as SISU said no we cannot talk because of exclusivity agreement in place, (
and didn't) .........then on the 8th they could. Is it possible to get a deal in that 7 days ready for the 16th? The problem for SISU is whether there is any evidence that they let the Storey deal die
because of the King interest or in any way encouraged the King bid before 8th. The remedy if proven though would seem to be against SISU and most likely for the costs involved in the Storey bid, not the ownership of CCFC, because SISU were not acting in good faith.
I would think it will delay the EFL process as they will want to be sure, and given CCFC past history who could blame them but ultimately will not change it.
Just wondering if this is something that gives King the excuse to walk away, not sure it will. Not really for him to answer though really, he wasn't part of the Storey/SISU exclusivity agreement
The only thing that irks me other than that was the whining that went on because they were not allowed to bid for the stadium......... because of an exclusivity agreement. Somewhat disingenuous really.