Waghorn to hudds (8 Viewers)

ms639

Well-Known Member
Funnily enough, half the country aren’t professional athletes.

Ahhhh yeah of course. Waggy the only player who got covid. Such bad luck


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ms639

Well-Known Member

Matt smith

Well-Known Member
Waghorn and Kane both big earners, think we’re gonna put a bit of a bid in for someone decent at centre back or up top
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Let's not hate on Waghorn to much, think he was clearly a decent professional and a good player to have in the dressing room and training ground.

However the right decision to move him on, high wage and picks up too many injuries and when he does play hasn't produced enough.

its not exactly a brave new world if we are having to ship players out before getting new ones in
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Such an awful player yet gets a championship club to take him on
Do you think Hudlin is good?

Also if Tavares is as bad as you say he also got a Championship club to sign him.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
Certainly a bad decision in hindsight to sign him, but considering his history and the fact he scored a few in a struggling for goals Derby side the season before we signed him it wasnt that bad of a pickup, first 10 games he looked like the perfect foil for Vik, I think the injuries and Covid took it out of him and he is in fact finished now. Good luck to him though
He scored five goals for Derby the season before we signed him.
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Such a weird take on the situation. Half the country had covid. He’s just over the hill.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No it isnt. Players of a certain age can have an injury and a lay off and they just lose that yard of pace. For example Kelly. Happens all the time. It wasn't like he contributed nothing.

It is why I have been concerned we havent got a McFadz understudy in already before this season. He is playing on borrowed time.
 

rexo87

Well-Known Member
its not exactly a brave new world if we are having to ship players out before getting new ones in
We are getting rid of probably 12k a week. If we passed up on that opportunity now it may not come again. Its a no brainer to let him go given the opportunity even if no one comes in beforehand

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
We are getting rid of probably 12k a week. If we passed up on that opportunity now it may not come again. Its a no brainer to let him go given the opportunity even if no one comes in beforehand

Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk

Kanes going to be on over 10 too so if charlton are paying half, and Huddersfield reportedly paying 90% of Shithorns wage, then thats a good 15k saved
 

Great_Expectations

Well-Known Member
Good professional but never quite worked for him here.

Was not going to be a starter for us, even in a two when Godden is fit, and not an exciting player to have on the bench as he’s not a game changer. So it was right to move him on.

If he was one of the higher earners, it’s even more of a fantastic bit of business!
 

ccfc1234

Well-Known Member
its not exactly a brave new world if we are having to ship players out before getting new ones in
It's a matter of timing I suspect. Ideally we would be bringing in a players replacement before one leaves. However, with the limited amount of takers for Waghorn on the salary he commands I suspect it was a matter of jumping at the chance of doing the deal and dealing with the replacement at a later date.

I know you enjoy being contrary at times and it can make for good debate, but based on what you have seen and knowing he is a high earner, do you think it was a mistake to let him go?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
No one has a clue how much waghorn and Kane are paid and if we are still contributing to those wages
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top