It was certainly Ray Ransons plan… and for many years in the lower leagues. But I’m not sure we can do it in the Championship.I thought the plan was buy low, develop and sell high. Fair enough if it isn’t
A plassie??? That’s done it for me….I’m outDecent player but given the fact that (realistically) the play offs are unlikely this season at 31 he doesn't fit the club's recruitment profile ( as often stated by M.R.)..free transfer yes short term contract,transfer fee? not wise imo.
Not that it's relevant but he's Coventry born but he's a Liverpool fan.
Struggling there…Did we pay a fee for Don Hutchinson? … he was older that 31. I thought he was decent but probably on a free.There’s some characters on here.
Suggesting we pay £400k plus then decent wages to a 31 year old who is out of favour.
When, in living memory, has CCFC paying a decent fee for a 31 year old worked out well?
I’ll wait.
There’s some characters on here.
Suggesting we pay £400k plus then decent wages to a 31 year old who is out of favour.
When, in living memory, has CCFC paying a decent fee for a 31 year old worked out well?
I’ll wait.
“£400k is quite trivial”Really surprised at some of the backlash. £400k really is quite trivial, especially when MR notes we can do something (paraphrasing) this window, so we have “something” available.
He is an experienced Championship player, capable of being a match winner and extra motivated as he’s a Cov kid and fan.
Attitude stuff isn’t fair or accurate.
But as it stands, there’s still nothing more than expressions of interest from both sides.
Same for another we’ve been linked with too.
I raise you Gary McAllister - 31 first time round at a cost of 3 million
Worth a watch given the speculation he's coming to Coventry.
It was certainly Ray Ransons plan… and for many years in the lower leagues. But I’m not sure we can do it in the Championship.
It’s a nominal fee apparently - supposedly we spend this kind of money on transfer fees all the time.Bad attitude, nearing retirement, lightweight and costing us most of our budget. What can go wrong?
Something to look forward to.I can guarantee that the fee will be undisclosed so if he comes we can carry on discussing how much vfm we got for ever and a day without anyone ever being able to prove us wrong.
So then what should be the plan? Because we certainly can’t afford many 7 figure fees-is it to buy 30+ year old cast offs?
Isn't that 'not feasible at this level'?Sell some of the high-value players and reinvest the proceeds into signing more of the Hamer/Sheaf/Gyokeres types.
Isn't that 'not feasible at this level'?
But didn't Brentford close their Academy to concentrate their funds on buying young players? I think they have re-started their Academy since promotion to PLCourse it is. Brentford did it.
How much did he cost? I doubt Paterson will prove to be good value in comparison - few players would.Wonder if there similar threads when we signed Fadz?
Plenty of clubs in this division do it. I’m not sure why we’re so keen to pretend we don’t have to fit into the food chain.Isn't that 'not feasible at this level'?
A free transfer signed for a different position in a different division. Not a great comparison.Wonder if there similar threads when we signed Fadz?
A free transfer signed for a different position in a different division. Not a great comparison.
We have G on here who is first in the queue to criticise Palmer as a waste of funds. Now we have him saying it's fine to spend a 6 figure fee on someone older and also not wanted by their current club after some indifferent form.
We're in the twilight zone
Melt down when we sign a player, melt down when we don't sign a player, melt down when we spend money, melt down when we don't spend money. This forum is comedy gold at times.Fucking hell trust robins will you?
It’s academic what the fee is “for” - £400k before wages is a substantial fee for a club with a catastrophic cash flow situation to be paying.No one knows what the fee is and what it’s for - could be a buy out on his contract
Palmer will be costing £1.5m in wages and some kind of fee - neither will have resale value
It’s academic what the fee is “for” - £400k before wages is a substantial fee for a club with a catastrophic cash flow situation to be paying.
In Doug We Trust is it then? Good luck!it really isn’t and king will have had to offer some assurances on funding the club for the season
It’s different coffee.Wonder if there similar threads when we signed Fadz?
Equally we shouldn't just assume it's more of the same after a couple of weeks. Only time will tell.In Doug We Trust is it then? Good luck!
In Doug We Trust is it then? Good luck!
Concerning though as they probably have a negative mindset in real life too. Not good for them or their kids etcMelt down when we sign a player, melt down when we don't sign a player, melt down when we spend money, melt down when we don't spend money. This forum is comedy gold at times.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk