Do you want to discuss boring politics? (133 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member

duffer

Well-Known Member
Slightly different topic, but there's an excellent (imho) editorial on the difference between how everyone is busting a gut, (rightfully) to save a few very rich westerners in peril in a mini-sub... As compared to what's happened in the med where a boat carrying 750 migrants (including children) was largely ignored until it sank, with the loss of hundreds.

Lots of different opinions on migration, obviously, but there's something uncomfortable about the difference in the approach here and how we value human life.

 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Slightly different topic, but there's an excellent (imho) editorial on the difference between how everyone is busting a gut, (rightfully) to save a few very rich westerners in peril in a mini-sub... As compared to what's happened in the med where a boat carrying 750 migrants (including children) was largely ignored until it sank, with the loss of hundreds.

Lots of different opinions on migration, obviously, but there's something uncomfortable about the difference in the approach here and how we value human life.

It’s sick!!
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Alison McGovern on Politics Live says that Labour would do nothing differently to the current government, they would stick to their "fiscal rules" and would do nothing that would add to the "instability". Post Truss they are in the space where they delude themselves to believe that the era of austerity is a safe place, and not the root cause of virtually all current problems.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Slightly different topic, but there's an excellent (imho) editorial on the difference between how everyone is busting a gut, (rightfully) to save a few very rich westerners in peril in a mini-sub... As compared to what's happened in the med where a boat carrying 750 migrants (including children) was largely ignored until it sank, with the loss of hundreds.

Lots of different opinions on migration, obviously, but there's something uncomfortable about the difference in the approach here and how we value human life.

Totally agree with this although I'm not really happy with myself for being not only less sympathetic, but also slightly pleased at the thought of billionaires wasting £250k on a trip to see the wreckage and not making it back. They too are someone's loved ones, I'm simply a heartless tosser :)
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Totally agree with this although I'm not really happy with myself for being not only less sympathetic, but also slightly pleased at the thought of billionaires wasting £250k on a trip to see the wreckage and not making it back. They too are someone's loved ones, I'm simply a heartless tosser :)

Play stupid games. No different to poshos who want to climb Everest or whatever for me.
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Play stupid games. No different to poshos who want to climb Everest or whatever for me.
I cant be doing with anyone going climbing in difficult terrain or out on the water when they're told not to.

It often ends up with either RNLI or search and rescue operations putting their own lives in danger and / or a drain on the air ambulance. I'm happy with them being adrenalin junkies if they choose to, on the understanding they accept that of they get into difficulty nobody is coming for them.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Play stupid games. No different to poshos who want to climb Everest or whatever for me.
I get Everest though. Would never have even thought about doing it myself but I can see why people want to do it. Not just posh people either, some very average joes spend years saving to do it. That submarine though, no thanks. You wouldn’t get me in it if you offered me £250k to do it.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I get Everest though. Would never have even thought about doing it myself but I can see why people want to do it. Not just posh people either, some very average joes spend years saving to do it. That submarine though, no thanks. You wouldn’t get me in it if you offered me £250k to do it.

I mean more those who just want to say they’ve done it and pay some Sherpa to do most of the work and don’t respect the situation and end up injured or whatever. Of course actual Mountaineers or whatever I’ve no issue with. More those that treat it like a Madame Tussaud’s attraction.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
And if you do want radical change it’s much more likely to happen with a stinking majority than a slim one.
Didn't with Blair tbf.

(And no I'm not arguing that he wasn't better than the Tories, because he was!)
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
I mean you are. We have a two party system pretty much. It’s shit but that’s what it is. And if you do want radical change it’s much more likely to happen with a stinking majority than a slim one.

I'd rather take a yoga mat shaped pen to the polling booth and give my vote to Ed.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I mean you are. We have a two party system pretty much. It’s shit but that’s what it is. And if you do want radical change it’s much more likely to happen with a stinking majority than a slim one.

Yes, a massive majority based on a policy of austerity is going to lead to radical change.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
Frankly the who is going to vote for who and why argument is boring now. Labour are barring a miracle going to win quite comfortably next year.

What concerns me is the fact that the government and BoE are purposefully pushing the economy in to recession (by removing disposable income from the economy, that's what rate hikes are designed to do) and they are doing it without any plan or support to help people.

It's absolute madness
 
Last edited:

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Do you think Labour are more or less likely to tack right in a hung Parliament/slim majority?

Labour will win seats in Scotland - over 20 - so it would be a minor miracle if they didn’t have a fairly high majority. A lot of Johnson’s majority were in seats where they’d never vote again for conservatives.

I can’t see how it’s possible they won’t have at least 50 seat majority
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Frankly the who is going to vote for who and why argument is boring now. Labour are barring a miracle going to win quite comfortably next year.

What concerns we if the fact that the government and BoE are purposefully pushing the economy in to recession (by removing disposable income from the economy, that's what rate hikes are designed to do) and they are doing it without any plan or support to help people.

It's absolute madness

This is all the orthodoxy that the former BoE understander of macroeconomics shadow chancellor is trained in. She has never once disputed that the rates should go up just that the government should mitigate against it.

Is it time to remove the 'independence' and put the government of the day back in control and make them fully accountable given how much interest rates affect people?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
This is all the orthodoxy that the former BoE understander of macroeconomics shadow chancellor is trained in. She has never once disputed that the rates should go up just that the government should mitigate against it.

Is it time to remove the 'independence' and put the government of the day back in control and make them fully accountable given how much interest rates affect people?

Yes it is it’s bizarre it was a labour government that made the change
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Because your choice is them, the Tories or not voting. And the other two are ridiculous options.

There are more parties I’m sure in his constituency
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Labour will win seats in Scotland - over 20 - so it would be a minor miracle if they didn’t have a fairly high majority. A lot of Johnson’s majority were in seats where they’d never vote again for conservatives.

I can’t see how it’s possible they won’t have at least 50 seat majority

Agreed. I previously thought Labour in a hung Parliament but with SNP unravelling and unlikely to be much improvement in economy/personal living standards in next 12months, I’d now be shocked if it wasn’t a Labour majority
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Would be disastrous in terms of market credibility and would mean the path of monetary policy becomes inherently less predictable - bad idea imo.

Yeah, would leave rate setting independent but not sure Bailey should still be in place. Shambles
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Labour will win seats in Scotland - over 20 - so it would be a minor miracle if they didn’t have a fairly high majority. A lot of Johnson’s majority were in seats where they’d never vote again for conservatives.

I can’t see how it’s possible they won’t have at least 50 seat majority

So you agree everyone should vote Labour. Good stuff.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top