Ccfcisparks
Well-Known Member
Decent half, became more subdued as half went on. One think we lack without Hamer is energy.
Yeah, Sheaf has done well but he's just not as explosiveDecent half, became more subdued as half went on. One think we lack without Hamer is energy.
Think if O'Hare is where Palmer is its a lot better, just lack the ankle biting without Hamer and COHYeah, Sheaf has done well but he's just not as explosive
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Idiots. You would think people would eventually learn it’s intentional.Why do our fans always groan and panic whenever we play it out the back?
You can see that he will come good. I think Robins has told him after Wednesday he needs to be slightly more cautious and not full guns blazing. Once that partnership with Thomas develops he will be fine.Van Ewijk needs to be stretching the game more, we had a breakaway at one point where he had lots of space to run into, Sheaf played it into the space but he was dawdling in midfield
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Agree, but with the caveat that it's still early days for Thomas to be considered better than McNally.Take confidence in Thomas and Latibeaudiere stepping forward and taking the ball. Not like recent CB’s who have retreated to following the man and letting them play. Thomas by far and away better than McNally.
Yeah he looks so slowThink MVE is just playing safe. He will continue to improve for sure
For my sins, I went on the Sunderland forum to see what they thought of Simms, and the more reasonable amongst them pointed out that his body language and posture don't reflect well on him or his ability - suspect the comparions to Tyler Walker being lazy will be thrown out sooner rather than later.I'm still backing Simms to find form... But he is deffo gonna be a boo boy for some on here due to his look on pitch, bit languid looking but I think that is just posture.
Hope he bags one soon to nip it in the bud