Matt smith
Well-Known Member
I read it on here
Match Thread Huddersfield (H) Mon 25/09 (6 Viewers)
- Thread starter Brighton Sky Blue
- Start date
That's not true and also not relevant anyway as both weren't fully match fit - I think there was about 3 games where they were both fully fit at the same time.
Last edited:
Grendel
Well-Known Member
palmer was on the bench the last 5 games and came on in several when o hare started so this stuff you peddle they were not fit is nonsense and they were both able to play together during all 11 games
they were both in every squad together - I think they started two games together - one when palmer was played as a forward
I think the only game they played in midfield as a collective unit from kick off was Wigan - they both came off at nil nil. Palmer then was a fully fit substitute as he was used in games but o hare started - there was realistically 8 games they could have started together and they started 1 in midfield which didn’t work and Blackpool from necessity
It's not nonsense, it's a fact.
Palmer was injured during the World Cup break and didn't train, hence why he didn't start the games after the break.
The only time they were both close to fully match fit at the same time was the run of 4 games from Blackpool to Wigan. They each started 3 times.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Yes it’s nonsense as palmer was selected for every game then on the bench and when o hare was injured in the 7th minute the “injured” Palmer replaced him.
In fact he came on for 3 of the 4 games.
You’ve just invented a narrative which there’s zero evidence to support. The Blackpool game doesn’t count as a midfield pairing.
Theres also the inconvenient fact that o hare was going to Burnley if he wasn’t injured
The Wigan game they started as Allen was rested. When Allen came on we won the game.
After the Blackpool game o hare started palmer didn’t. Against Watford palmer started and was replaced and o hare came on.
After the Wigan game palmer was dropped for Jamie Allen against QPR
Robins could have played them both and didn’t against Blackburn Watford and QPR
I genuinely can’t see the other game they both started in - which was it?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Hammered at 11am on a Sunday, fair play.
Er you’ve edited my post?
I’ve stated that during November Wigan from what I see was the only game they played together
Prior to that and after the Blackburn game
Blackburn- o hare starts
Watford - palmer starts
Wigan - start together and Allen rested
Qpr - o hare starts and palmer is benched
The first game after the break is reading. The injured palmer comes on in that game
Against West Brom palmer comes on
The only game he doesn’t is Swansea
Which other game did they start - I don’t see it
Sky Blue Heaven
Well-Known Member
clint van damme
Well-Known Member
S
Leaving aside rumours of another injury why is Fadz talking about when he's fully fit?
He's been playing regularly, didn't he have a full pre season?
Leaving aside rumours of another injury why is Fadz talking about when he's fully fit?
He's been playing regularly, didn't he have a full pre season?
Grendel
Well-Known Member
Why is PVA laughing at this post - why won’t he answer and have a sensible debate?
It's the Blackpool game, you can't just ignore it because it doesn't suit your narrative.
And I explained why Palmer didn't start after the international break. You ignored that too.
It's you that won't have a sensible debate.
Grendel
Well-Known Member
I said they stated Blackpool and Wigan - you said they started 3 together?
I’ve also detailed every game around that and stated the only game that they started together was Wigan in midfield and after the Blackpool game and post that game that they never have either before or after the World Cup break - why weren’t they paired together?
So why didn’t a fully fit Kasey Palmer and Callum O Hare start together against Blackburn Watford and QPR when buy your own admission they were fully fit
And where is the third game they started together?
It’s also a slight on Robins to suggest he’s over the course of a whole month in December playing an injured player in 3 of the 4 games
Good grief. You seriously need to learn to read. And put the bottle down.
Enjoy the rest of your Sunday, this is utterly pointless.
Assuming you mean Dasilva left, yeah that's what I'd go with. Though Binks hasn't done much wrong tbf so a bit harsh on him but we need to see Kitching from the start.
ProfessorbyGrace
Well-Known Member
I feel as though we need a dedicated ‘Injury and Rehabilitation’ thread on here.
Considering how many we have, it’d be good to keep track.
Considering how many we have, it’d be good to keep track.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Saying what?
covcity4life
Well-Known Member
End of day what do mark robins and mcfadz know?
Sky blue scum the both of them.
Sky blue scum the both of them.
Sky Blue Harry H
Well-Known Member
First post - he won't tell you who it is
Second post - you seem to know who it is?
I'm confused, but whoever it is, I hope that it is something fairly minor. Palme is the obvious one for 'history'., and half the forum wanted him dropped anyway. Speedy recovery, whoever it is.
There's a few obvious contenders! Palmer, Godden, Eccles, Kelly for previous injury issues.
Or one of the new signings to go with MVE for the 'just our luck category'.
(though he later said it was Palmer anyway)
Matt smith
Well-Known Member
It’s Palmer
Philosorapter
Well-Known Member
What happens now, aside from the injury. Who have we got in midfield?
Midfield setup?
Midfield setup?
Assuming Palmer is injured then Eccles and Kelly, with Ayari at AM. Allen and Sakamoto on the bench.
Saddlebrains
Well-Known Member
ccfc1234
Well-Known Member
.............................Wilson.............................
Lati..........Thomas..........Kitching.....JDS....
..................Eccles.............Kelly..................
...Saka.............Ayari........Palmer.............
............................Wright........................
4-2-3-1 this formation would get the most from Wright who looks good running off the shoulders of defenders. Godden to start perhaps given his scoring run.
Lati..........Thomas..........Kitching.....JDS....
..................Eccles.............Kelly..................
...Saka.............Ayari........Palmer.............
............................Wright........................
4-2-3-1 this formation would get the most from Wright who looks good running off the shoulders of defenders. Godden to start perhaps given his scoring run.
SkyBlueSoul
Well-Known Member
This is my best guess. MR may have called Saka out after Cardiff but he's our best bet for keeping pace and width on that side while not messing with the back 3 too much, and we are at home so hopefully he'll be looking to attack. Ayari in for Palmer is pretty easy, don't think Allen's ready for a start yet. Binks hasn't done much wrong but MR did say he wasn't totally happy with him after Tuesday and you'd think Kitching was brought in as first choice on that side. You'd like to think Simms showed enough when he came on to replace Wright.
Wilson
Lats Fadz Kitching
Saka Kelly Eccles Dasilva
Ayari
Godden Simms
Wilson
Lats Fadz Kitching
Saka Kelly Eccles Dasilva
Ayari
Godden Simms
Sick Boy
Well-Known Member
It sounds like Palmer is injured.
curly_tom
Well-Known Member
It seems odd to me that anyone would think that anyobe other than Saka would play on the right. It seemed that he bought 2 RWBs and tried them both, preferred MVE who is now injured, so Saka gets a turn. I didn't hear the comment MR made but I doubt it was so strong that he is now going to never play his new signing again after a few games. He spend money on him and obviously thinks he'll be good at this level.
