This Is an interesting blog
@Mucca Mad Boys
Last week I posted about the NHSE-led front page story in the Times in which the NHSE recognised the importance of improving productivity. That post provoked a lengthy comment from someone claiming…
blog.pauldcorrigan.com
This was interesting and I'm glad you shared it. One of the advantages the NHS has is its integration and centralised database of patient records. I don't think anyone can argue with the poor morale and lack of equipment impacting productivity.
It's the funding model that is unsustainable in my view. As you say, the NHS can barely afford to do 'basic functions' yet this service still accounts for 40% of the governments and it is
still underfunded. Equipment, staff and infrastructure all have costs and with record demand for the service, it's costs are only going increase. If only if it was simple as throwing money at the problem.
We have record dissatisfaction with the service of the NHS provides and (probably) record low job satisfaction for its staff, everyone deserves better. The pressure on a Labour government to fix everything if (when) they get elected is huge because the convenient narrative is that the Tories have (some going as far to say deliberately) underfunded it.
Ultimately, I am not against the principle of healthcare being free at the point of use and this is principle is applied across Europe with alternative funding methods.