Or you bury you head in the sand and don’t move forward.To be clear: I know the theory, but it’s the people you hire that matter not their job titles. Otherwise you bake in poor performance not high standards.
Or you bury you head in the sand and don’t move forward.To be clear: I know the theory, but it’s the people you hire that matter not their job titles. Otherwise you bake in poor performance not high standards.
Or you bury you head in the sand and don’t move forward.
Correction!!! Would say promoted to Manager.
Mikel Arteta's Arsenal job title changes from head coach to first-team manager
New chief executive Vinai Venkatesham: Thats recognition of what hes been doing from the day he walked in the door, but also where we see his capabilitieswww.skysports.com
So when your teaching I suppose you still use a blackboard and chalk? It exactly the same thing.We’ve been moving forwards for seven years. After twenty odd of moving backwards.
I stand corrected then... but it doesn't alter the fact that a Head Coach is now the norm in most football clubs in this country and (basically) the whole of Europe.Correction!!! Would say promoted to Manager.
Mikel Arteta's Arsenal job title changes from head coach to first-team manager
New chief executive Vinai Venkatesham: Thats recognition of what hes been doing from the day he walked in the door, but also where we see his capabilitieswww.skysports.com
I stand corrected then... but it doesn't alter the fact that a Head Coach is now the norm in most football clubs in this country and (basically) the whole of Europe.
Mark Robins recently said he was happy with the new structure because he could no longer carry out all of the tasks that the club needed .
Not trueI’m not so sure it really norm. Maybe in clubs owned by Americans?
Pep is manager and I believe most prem club have managers. The reasons for this is a manager getting involved in transfer can attract and convince players that they have in their old boys network to join them. Pep could with a phone call attract most players he wants.
I might be wrong but majority of Prem teams have managers than head coaches. Same in Europe.
I'm sure we get a discount on the tracksuits from sports direct.The bill for iPads and blue tracksuits must be phenomenal.
That can't be right. We are following these top clubs.Correction!!! Would say promoted to Manager.
Mikel Arteta's Arsenal job title changes from head coach to first-team manager
New chief executive Vinai Venkatesham: Thats recognition of what hes been doing from the day he walked in the door, but also where we see his capabilitieswww.skysports.com
@Sky Blue Dal you are aware (I'm guessing) that Pep is an outlier in many respects in terms of assistants?..
He's the only manager/coach in world football that has his best friend employed as an "assistant" purely for the reason of non football related social activities.
I stand corrected then... but it doesn't alter the fact that a Head Coach is now the norm in most football clubs in this country and (basically) the whole of Europe.
Mark Robins recently said he was happy with the new structure because he could no longer carry out all of the tasks that the club needed .
Clint I would imagine that would be the case yesSo that includes all the European teams who underachieve and get relegated as well then?
Interesting that we’ll be calling our new manager a ‘Head Coach’.
Little to no involvement with transfers etc i expect. More just someone to front training and tactics
Great, that's why they're the top clubs I suppose and not just because they are exceptionally wealthy and have the best playersit's the system top clubs have used for a long time
And for 27 years we had a terrible set up agreed?We’ve been moving forwards for seven years. After twenty odd of moving backwards.
You can’t explain why though can you?
And for 27 years we had a terrible set up agreed?
I dunno maybe ask Brentford or Brighton?What’s the point of a set up?
I dunno maybe ask Brentford or Brighton?
But if you want it all down to the manager what if we hired a Russel Slade???Maybe ask Man City and Arsenal.
All I see as a “benefit” is it gives an owner more control over their asset.
I dunno maybe ask Brentford or Brighton?
But if you want it all down to the manager what if we hired a Russel Slade???
Not every set up is identical. But you must agree it's good to have one?The Brighton who let their new head coach appoint his own assistant and sign players over 30, same as we used to do, that Brighton?
But robins wouldn't have been here forever! The club comes first.We had a Mark Robins!
If you make all the hiring decisions you’re just saying you are better than any manager.
The chance of a good manager isn’t improved by this setup, and we had a good manager.
Not every set up is identical. But you must agree it's good to have one?
Shme
I have no issue with that. For me I just wanna give it more time before deciding wether coaches not assistants is a truly bad thing or not I guess.Potter literally stripped Brightons when he went to Chelsea, so much for continuity.
And as I keep repeating, I've no issue with modernising the set up, my issue is with how it's been done.
Crazy for a club of their statureView attachment 39255
So it lasted two years and was a failure. Don’t they want to be an elite club?
or maybe they just know what they are doing and use the best systemGreat, that's why they're the top clubs I suppose and not just because they are exceptionally wealthy and have the best players
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Explain why it will work for Coventry without those other advantages David, you know it very well clearly.or maybe they just know what they are doing and use the best system
daft plank