Head Coach rather than Manager (1 Viewer)

SAJ

Well-Known Member
To be clear: I know the theory, but it’s the people you hire that matter not their job titles. Otherwise you bake in poor performance not high standards.
Or you bury you head in the sand and don’t move forward.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

nicksar

Well-Known Member
Correction!!! Would say promoted to Manager.

😁 I stand corrected then... but it doesn't alter the fact that a Head Coach is now the norm in most football clubs in this country and (basically) the whole of Europe.
Mark Robins recently said he was happy with the new structure because he could no longer carry out all of the tasks that the club needed .
 

Sky Blue Dal

Well-Known Member
😁 I stand corrected then... but it doesn't alter the fact that a Head Coach is now the norm in most football clubs in this country and (basically) the whole of Europe.
Mark Robins recently said he was happy with the new structure because he could no longer carry out all of the tasks that the club needed .

I’m not so sure it really norm. Maybe in clubs owned by Americans?

Pep is manager and I believe most prem club have managers. The reasons for this is a manager getting involved in transfer can attract and convince players that they have in their old boys network to join them. Pep could with a phone call attract most players he wants.

I might be wrong but majority of Prem teams have managers than head coaches. Same in Europe.
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
I’m not so sure it really norm. Maybe in clubs owned by Americans?

Pep is manager and I believe most prem club have managers. The reasons for this is a manager getting involved in transfer can attract and convince players that they have in their old boys network to join them. Pep could with a phone call attract most players he wants.

I might be wrong but majority of Prem teams have managers than head coaches. Same in Europe.
Not true
 

nicksar

Well-Known Member
@Sky Blue Dal you are aware (I'm guessing) that Pep is an outlier in many respects in terms of assistants?..
He's the only manager/coach in world football that has his best friend employed as an "assistant" purely for the reason of non football related social activities.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I get that this might just be benchmarking and copying the structure followed at many top clubs.

People have said that it aids transition between head coaches, but I'm not totally on board with that. Pragmatically, you can expect a head coach/mananger to leave at some point, and football is notorious for short tenures so it makes sense to insulate against that, but it also seems a bit defeatist to me. Like you're expecting failure.

But as well as this I can't help but feel it's also a move that allows DK more control. A head coach doesn't necessarily get any say in signings. Their job is to take the players they are given and mould them into a team. So if Doug wants to sign 14 young strikers that have been earmarked to be worth a lot more in the future he can. It's up to the Head Coach to sort that. Similarly he won't have a manager banging on in his ear about pesky loans and older experienced players that don't have any future transfer value.

I might be wrong, but just a feeling I have.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
😁 I stand corrected then... but it doesn't alter the fact that a Head Coach is now the norm in most football clubs in this country and (basically) the whole of Europe.
Mark Robins recently said he was happy with the new structure because he could no longer carry out all of the tasks that the club needed .

So that includes all the European teams who underachieve and get relegated as well then?
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Interesting that we’ll be calling our new manager a ‘Head Coach’.

Little to no involvement with transfers etc i expect. More just someone to front training and tactics

Well it is no surprise as that is what Mark Robins had become and the way most clubs are run.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
But if you want it all down to the manager what if we hired a Russel Slade???

We had a Mark Robins!

If you make all the hiring decisions you’re just saying you are better than any manager.

The chance of a good manager isn’t improved by this setup, and we had a good manager.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
The Brighton who let their new head coach appoint his own assistant and sign players over 30, same as we used to do, that Brighton?
Not every set up is identical. But you must agree it's good to have one?

Shmee is saying he wants sisu organisation back for crying out out
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
We had a Mark Robins!

If you make all the hiring decisions you’re just saying you are better than any manager.

The chance of a good manager isn’t improved by this setup, and we had a good manager.
But robins wouldn't have been here forever! The club comes first.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Not every set up is identical. But you must agree it's good to have one?

Shme

Potter literally stripped Brightons when he went to Chelsea, so much for continuity.

And as I keep repeating, I've no issue with modernising the set up, my issue is with how it's been done.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Potter literally stripped Brightons when he went to Chelsea, so much for continuity.

And as I keep repeating, I've no issue with modernising the set up, my issue is with how it's been done.
I have no issue with that. For me I just wanna give it more time before deciding wether coaches not assistants is a truly bad thing or not I guess.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top