I look at Robins recruitment when he was apparently totally in charge. A mixture of old heads, experienced players, some young potential and hit and miss loans. With his backroom staff he built several really successful teams for the division we were/are in.
If you look at Robins statements and interviews, there has been a change of emphasis. Unless I am misinterpreting his asides, recruitment was taken out of his hands. In "elite" set ups, the Head Coach does not have the final say on transfer policy or who to sign. They have input and can strongly object, but the final say is not theirs. King could say Robins would sign off the players, but in reality it is unlikely he would say no to the recruitment team who have done all the background work and due diligence.
There has been a major change in policy since King has arrived. We have bought young potential to maximise resale value. No older experienced players with less resale value and no loans at all. The only club in the Championship I have read with no loans. Despite Austin's claim it is difficult to get loans, that does not compute. I suspect we have no loans because they are less cost effective.
There seems to be some strong evidence that our recruitment model has changed completely and I suspect this was not Robin's decision.