Southport Stabbing (24 Viewers)

rob9872

Well-Known Member
Ok simple then
Why did the government release no information about the person but allowed the press a picture when he was an 11 year old boy and told the press to publish that he used to sing in the choir ?
OK simple then.

Because they were worried, with good reason, about reprisals. Unfortunately they went so far in the opposite direction that they made themselves look silly and it had the reverse effect. There was that photo, he wasn't muslim, he sang in a choir, he was Welsh, we didnt know about him, he didnt arrive illegally and so it went on.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator
It’s probably a good thing that most are known to the authorities
It means our police and security services do an amazing job
Suppose we could pretend that the tories and tax reducing reform will increase the police and security numbers and spending and it will be better
I’m very happy we can focus on what went wrong with the prevent process and the risk management to end up with this horrific attack
That’s a sensible question
It’s not where reform musk and the reform voters are at

Why are you going on about bringing down Starmer and now Musk and reform voters when nobody is actually saying anything about them in this conversation?

I don't think anybody is saying somebody said "Oh Axel is going out today to kill people, let's sit back and see what kicks off". It's more that when it happened there were plenty who knew him, went to school with him and said what he was really like but the image of him chosen was that he was a young BBC star, Welsh, Choirboy etc.

Can you not see why it will have pissed people off?
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
OK simple then.

Because they were worried, with good reason, about reprisals. Unfortunately they went so far in the opposite direction that they made themselves look silly and it had the reverse effect. There was that photo, he wasn't muslim, he sang in a choir, he was Welsh, we didnt know about him, he didnt arrive illegally and so it went on.
So which of that is false and this is the nub and this is already further than any Twitter discussion I’ve had so thank you and it’s really useful

photo was accurate it was just not recent - who released it? Government????
I didn’t see anything saying he wasn’t a Muslim it just wasn’t Muslim attacks kids but you think it would have helped if this info was known to have said we believe he’s a Muslim convert from a Christian home? I think I can agree with that. That would have been useful if it was known
He did sing in a choir
He was welsh
He didn’t arrive illegally he was born in wales
 

Nick

Administrator
OK simple then.

Because they were worried, with good reason, about reprisals. Unfortunately they went so far in the opposite direction that they made themselves look silly and it had the reverse effect. There was that photo, he wasn't muslim, he sang in a choir, he was Welsh, we didnt know about him, he didnt arrive illegally and so it went on.

When in reality, they knew all about him and would have known everything about him within minutes of it happening (if not sooner).

Obviously they aren't going to release everything while things are being investigated but they knew full well how different the image of him that was being pushed was completely different to the person who had committed the crime.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Why are you going on about bringing down Starmer and now Musk and reform voters when nobody is actually saying anything about them in this conversation?

I don't think anybody is saying somebody said "Oh Axel is going out today to kill people, let's sit back and see what kicks off". It's more that when it happened there were plenty who knew him, went to school with him and said what he was really like but the image of him chosen was that he was a young BBC star, Welsh, Choirboy etc.

Can you not see why it will have pissed people off?
Yes
But you and Rob are saying this was what the government chose?
also actually Rob has suggested why and actually if that was the case it’s not bad but I’d have stuck with the truth as we know it
He also didn’t add his family were helped to stay by starmer and his dad was a war lord and wanted for genocide in Rwanda
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
When in reality, they knew all about him and would have known everything about him within minutes of it happening (if not sooner).

Obviously they aren't going to release everything while things are being investigated but they knew full well how different the image of him that was being pushed was completely different to the person who had committed the crime.
Can you share government statements that were misleading?
does anyone say he’s not a muslim
I remember the debates on here.
 

Nick

Administrator
So which of that is false and this is the nub and this is already further than any Twitter discussion I’ve had so thank you and it’s really useful

photo was accurate it was just not recent - who released it? Government????
I didn’t see anything saying he wasn’t a Muslim it just wasn’t Muslim attacks kids but you think it would have helped if this info was known to have said we believe he’s a Muslim convert from a Christian home? I think I can agree with that. That would have been useful if it was known
He did sing in a choir
He was welsh
He didn’t arrive illegally he was born in wales

I'm not sure if you can try any harder to miss his point.

He had Ricin, he was obsessed with mass killings, he was taking knives into school, he attacked people with a hockey stick, and people who dealt with him wanted police to be present. He was being named on social media and things like this were being said but it was labelled "misinformation" :

Screenshot 2025-01-20 155545.png

I'm sure most killers did some nice things when they were little kids but I'm not sure it's that relevant if we found out that Ian Huntley once starred in his nativity or if Peter Sutcliffe was close to his nan.

It's also being said that he did want to go to a high school a week earlier but his dad talked him out of it, what did his dad know?
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure if you can try any harder to miss his point.

He had Ricin, he was obsessed with mass killings, he was taking knives into school, he attacked people with a hockey stick, and people who dealt with him wanted police to be present.

I'm sure most killers did some nice things when they were little kids but I'm not sure it's that relevant if we found out that Ian Huntley once starred in his nativity or if Peter Sutcliffe was close to his nan.

It's also being said that he did want to go to a high school a week earlier but his dad talked him out of it, what did his dad know?
Sorry what is the point I am missing
Is it again that he should have been stopped before committing the crime?
or that the government should have shared the information as soon as they had it to inflame sensitivities and chances of a riot or are you agreeing it was sensible to try and avoid it or something else
 

rob9872

Well-Known Member
So which of that is false and this is the nub and this is already further than any Twitter discussion I’ve had so thank you and it’s really useful

photo was accurate it was just not recent - who released it? Government????
I didn’t see anything saying he wasn’t a Muslim it just wasn’t Muslim attacks kids but you think it would have helped if this info was known to have said we believe he’s a Muslim convert from a Christian home? I think I can agree with that. That would have been useful if it was known
He did sing in a choir
He was welsh
He didn’t arrive illegally he was born in wales
It was more that that they were so desperate to spread that narrative. I'm sure you will have read about his parents and the Starmer link, he wasn't a Christian. I also know that a lot of people I know who are UK to born to eg Indian heritage, refer to themselves as British Indian rather than British or Indian, he was listed as only Welsh. It's not so much wrong as trying to sell a story and they were clearly trying too hard, bearing in mind the atrocities that he'd just carried out.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It was more that that they were so desperate to spread that narrative. I'm sure you will have read about his parents and the Starmer link, he wasn't a Christian. I also know that a lot of people I know who are UK to born to eg Indian heritage, refer to themselves as British Indian rather than British or Indian, he was listed as only Welsh. It's not so much wrong as trying to sell a story and they were clearly trying too hard, bearing in mind the atrocities that he'd just carried out.

Who is “they” in your first sentence?
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
So you really can't see the picture that was painted of him compared to the reality?
Where do you start
Hideous murder takes place
Police arrest the killer
Charge him with murder and investigate
Social media goes mental with misinformation some of which happens to be accurate not because it was known to be but because there’s an m o
I think that’s ok to say
Now Rob’s suggestion then makes perfect sense and it’s in the delivery the mistakes happened but they were defending things at that point
You would look to minimise tensions wouldn’t you?
Are you suggesting that the sun express and mail were in the governments pocket!
 

Nick

Administrator
Sorry what is the point I am missing
Is it again that he should have been stopped before committing the crime?
or that the government should have shared the information as soon as they had it to inflame sensitivities and chances of a riot or are you agreeing it was sensible to try and avoid it or something else

The point is they didn't try and avoid it, it was all in on the choirboy rhetoric. Now I will mention Starmer, what he did was inflame the situation even more by coming out called everybody right wing if they disagreed or had concerns. He pouted fuel all over it and if anything, drove people towards the people making Telegram groups. Starmer would have known everything at that time as well.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
It was more that that they were so desperate to spread that narrative. I'm sure you will have read about his parents and the Starmer link, he wasn't a Christian. I also know that a lot of people I know who are UK to born to eg Indian heritage, refer to themselves as British Indian rather than British or Indian, he was listed as only Welsh. It's not so much wrong as trying to sell a story and they were clearly trying too hard, bearing in mind the atrocities that he'd just carried out.
Who was trying to sell a story? The police and security and the government?

I think I agree with you that the subsequent government public announcements were about seeking to reduce tension but because truth was lacking and because some social media parties were looking to take advantage this backfired significantly
 

Nick

Administrator
Where do you start
Hideous murder takes place
Police arrest the killer
Charge him with murder and investigate
Social media goes mental with misinformation some of which happens to be accurate not because it was known to be but because there’s an m o
I think that’s ok to say
Now Rob’s suggestion then makes perfect sense and it’s in the delivery the mistakes happened but they were defending things at that point
You would look to minimise tensions wouldn’t you?
Are you suggesting that the sun express and mail were in the governments pocket!

How did it work out with minimising tensions?

It turns out that a fair bit of the "misinformation" that was being said was actually true, of course there was a lot of nonsense also being said but the core points were actually true.

I have posted a screenshot of what was played down at the time, which turns out is actually true.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
The point is they didn't try and avoid it, it was all in on the choirboy rhetoric. Now I will mention Starmer, what he did was inflame the situation even more by coming out called everybody right wing if they disagreed or had concerns. He pouted fuel all over it and if anything, drove people towards the people making Telegram groups. Starmer would have known everything at that time as well.
The press gave the choir boy line
What would you want a responsible government to come out and say??
Both of us would probably need to listen to the announcement as I’m pretty sure he didn’t say anyone who disagrees or has concerns is far right I think it was those who were seeking to act violently or encourage violence were far right but I’m not certain
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
How did it work out with minimising tensions?

It turns out that a fair bit of the "misinformation" that was being said was actually true, of course there was a lot of nonsense also being said but the core points were actually true.

I have posted a screenshot of what was played down at the time, which turns out is actually true.
On here today or before?
I think it’s important to be specific about stuff and recognise the nuance
 

Nick

Administrator
On here today or before?
I think it’s important to be specific about stuff and recognise the nuance

Specific about what? I don't think you can get as specific as somebody saying "He was in my class, he was expelled for bringing in a knife to school".

Yeah, it could have been fake. It turns out that it's much closer to the reality of things than him being a Welsh Choirboy called Gethin.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Good thread on the misconceptions on Prevent (by a Tory if that helps you digest it)

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
The press gave the choir boy line
What would you want a responsible government to come out and say??
Both of us would probably need to listen to the announcement as I’m pretty sure he didn’t say anyone who disagrees or has concerns is far right I think it was those who were seeking to act violently or encourage violence were far right but I’m not certain

It’s standard tabloid fare “Oh look at this angel turned devil - what could possibly have happened”. They do it with everyone.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Where do you start
Hideous murder takes place
Police arrest the killer
Charge him with murder and investigate
Social media goes mental with misinformation some of which happens to be accurate not because it was known to be but because there’s an m o
I think that’s ok to say
Now Rob’s suggestion then makes perfect sense and it’s in the delivery the mistakes happened but they were defending things at that point
You would look to minimise tensions wouldn’t you?
Are you suggesting that the sun express and mail were in the governments pocket!

You are sounding as deranged as Schmeee
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
Specific about what? I don't think you can get as specific as somebody saying "He was in my class, he was expelled for bringing in a knife to school".

Yeah, it could have been fake. It turns out that it's much closer to the reality of things than him being a Welsh Choirboy called Gethin.
Sorry the document you shared on here
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Thank you

I don't understand what point you are trying to make.

He was clearly a dangerous and disturbed individual. Misinformation occurs when the actual facts are suppressed.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
How many potential murderers and terrorists will volunteer I wonder?

Well quite.

The problem here is lone wolf attackers radicalising themselves on YouTube on their toilet are very hard to spot. And 99% of people who sound like nutters aren’t nutters they’ve just spent too long on social media *cough* half this forum *cough*.

Pursue, the part of the CONTEST anti terrorist strategy after Prevent is about actually stopping attacks and relies on informants and old fashioned undercover work, which obviously don’t apply to lone wolf attacks.

But that’s not as fun as pretending you’re waging a one man war against the forces of evil so whatever I guess.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top